Volume 35, Issue 1 pp. 69-73
Clinical Article

Bacterial uropathogens and antibiotic susceptibility of positive urine cultures in women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence

Nathan Kow

Corresponding Author

Nathan Kow

Center for Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Correspondence to: Nathan Kow, M.D., Fellow, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, A81, Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Emily Holthaus

Emily Holthaus

Lerner School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew D. Barber

Matthew D. Barber

Center for Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 October 2014
Citations: 8
Roger Dmochowski led the peer-review process as the Associate Editor responsible for the paper.
Potential conflicts of interest: Nothing to disclose.
Presented at American Urogynecologic Society 34th Annual Scientific Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, October 16–19, 2013.
Contributions: N. Kow Protocol development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing; E. Holthaus: Data collection, Manuscript editing; M.D. Barber: Protocol development, Data analysis, Manuscript editing.

Abstract

Aims

The aims of the study are to describe the speciation and resistance patterns of positive urinary cultures in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) and those undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Methods

Urine cultures with a colony count of >105 CFU and <3 isolated uropathogens at a tertiary care Urogynecology practice over a 5-year period for patients with anterior wall dominant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or urinary incontinence (UI) were identified. Speciation and culture sensitivity data were described for each group and compared to a control group who did not currently have a PFD and who had not undergone pelvic surgery within a year of their positive culture. Additionally, early post-operative UTIs (≤6 weeks) and late post-operative UTIs (>6 weeks but ≤1 year) were compared.

Results

1,306 positive urine cultures over the 5-year period with 51 different species of uropathogens were identified. The percentage of Escherichia coli identified was not significantly different between groups: POP 57.1%, Stress UI 58.4%, Urge UI 54.3%, non-operative controls 54.3%. Cultures obtained from patients on prophylactic antibiotics were significantly less likely to have E. coli (adjusted OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22, 0.89, P < 0.0216). Non-E. coli cultures were more common in the early post-operative period compared to the late post-operative cultures (69% vs. 41%, adjusted OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22, 0.48, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Patients with PFDs who develop UTIs have rates of non-E. coli over 40% of the time. Treatment based on culture and antibiotic sensitivity data should be considered. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:69–73, 2016. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.