Volume 19, Issue 3 pp. 277-284
Main Article

Trigeminal motor nerve conduction: Deep temporal and mylohyoid nerves

Timothy R. Dillingham MD

Corresponding Author

Timothy R. Dillingham MD

Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

10352 Waverly Woods Drive, Ellicott City, MD 21042Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas T. Spellman MD

Nicholas T. Spellman MD

Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

Search for more papers by this author
Audrey S. Chang PhD

Audrey S. Chang PhD

Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1996
Citations: 8

Abstract

This article describes nerve conduction studies of the deep temporal nerve (DTN) and the mylohyoid nerve (MHN) motor branches of the trigeminal nerve. These nerves were stimulated intraorally with a pediatric surface stimulator. Compound muscle action potentials were recorded over the temporalis and mylohyoid muscles with surface electrodes. Forty-two subjects were studied. In all subjects the MHN response was elicited bilaterally, giving an upper latency limit of 2.3 ms. The mean MHN amplitude was 4.9 mV (SD = 1.8 mV, minimum = 1.3 mV). The maximal side-to-side latency difference was 0.4 ms, and the maximal side-to-side amplitude difference was 2.2 mV. The DTN response was only elicited bilaterally in 25 (60%) subjects. The average DTN latency was 2.1 ms (SD = 0.3, maximum = 2.7 ms). The average DTN amplitude was 4.3 mV (SD = 2.0, minimum = 0.3 mV). The MHN responses were the least technically demanding, and were more consistently elicited than the DTN responses. These nerve conduction techniques should prove useful in patients with trigeminal nerve disorders. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me