Volume 18, Issue 1 pp. 52-59
Article
Full Access

Extensor digitorum brevis reflex in normals and patients with radiculopathies

Timothy R. Dillingham MD

Corresponding Author

Timothy R. Dillingham MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

10352 Waverly Woods Drive, Ellicott City, MD 21042Search for more papers by this author
Raul Marin MD

Raul Marin MD

Department of Orthopedics, 2nd General Hospital, Landstahl, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Praxedes V. Belandres MD

Praxedes V. Belandres MD

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

Search for more papers by this author
Audrey Chang PhD

Audrey Chang PhD

Department of Clinical Investigation Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

Search for more papers by this author
First published: January 1995
Citations: 15

Abstract

This prospective study evaluated the extensor digitorum brevis deep tendon reflex (EDBR) in a normal population and in patients with L-5 and S-1 radiculopathies. There were 88 subjects: 53 normals, 17 L-5, and 18 S-1 radiculopathy subjects. The clinical EDBR revealed a 91% specificity, with 18% sensitivity for L-5, and 11% for S-1. The electrodiagnostic EDBR yielded increased sensitivities of 35% for L-5 (P = 0.07) and 39% for S-1 (P = 0.04), with 87% specificity. H-reflexes showed 50% sensitivity for the S-1 group (P = 0.0006) and 91% specificity. EDBR latencies were significantly related to age and leg length (r2 = 0.46, P < 0.0001). Age alone explained 26% (P < 0.0001) of the EDBR variability and leg length 20% (P < 0.0001). EDBR clinical and electrodiagnostic reflexes have low sensitivities, high specificities, and do not discriminate L-5 from S-1 root involvement.© 1995 John Wiley &Sons, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me