Volume 60, Issue 5 pp. 566-570
Clinical Research Article

Average proportional consecutive interval difference accurately differentiates spontaneous activity from motor unit potentials

Gregory T. Robbins MD

Corresponding Author

Gregory T. Robbins MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Correspondence

Gregory T. Robbins, 1800 Lombard St, 1st Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19147.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Bradley G. Tucker MD

Bradley G. Tucker MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel W. Stashuk PhD

Daniel W. Stashuk PhD

Department of Systems Design Engineering, Waterloo University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy R. Dillingham MD, MS

Timothy R. Dillingham MD, MS

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 August 2019
Citations: 2

Abstract

Introduction

An objective method is required to detect spontaneous activity (SA) for prevalence studies in needle electromyography (EMG). Because of frequent similarities in the morphology of SA and motor unit potentials (MUP), identification of SA depends on assessment of firing regularity, which has not yet been quantitated through a modern interface.

Methods

Prospective recordings obtained from patients referred for electrodiagnostic evaluation were analyzed by using decomposition-based quantitative EMG (DQEMG) customized to calculate descriptive statistics.

Results

Forty-four MUP recordings (39 participants) and 80 SA recordings (62 participants) were analyzed. One hundred one of 124 recordings successfully interfaced with DQEMG. The remaining recordings were analyzed in Audacity. Average proportional consecutive interval differences differentiated SA from MUPs with 97.5% sensitivity (confidence interval [CI] 91.3%-99.7%) and 100.0% specificity (CI 92%-100%). There was substantial overlap, however, for SD and mean consecutive differences.

Discussion

Average proportional consecutive interval difference accurately differentiates SA from MUPs and may be useful in future prevalence studies of SA.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

DQEMG was developed by Daniel Stashuk, who could benefit from commercialization. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this report.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me