Volume 57, Issue 3 pp. 473-477
Basic Science Research

Prophylactic stretching does not reduce cramp susceptibility

Kevin C. Miller PhD, ATC

Corresponding Author

Kevin C. Miller PhD, ATC

School of Rehabilitation and Medical Sciences, Central Michigan University, 1208 Health Professions Building, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, 48859 USA

Correspondence to: K.C. Miller; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
James D. Harsen DPT

James D. Harsen DPT

School of Rehabilitation and Medical Sciences, Central Michigan University, 1208 Health Professions Building, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, 48859 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Blaine C. Long PhD, ATC

Blaine C. Long PhD, ATC

School of Rehabilitation and Medical Sciences, Central Michigan University, 1208 Health Professions Building, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, 48859 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 August 2017
Citations: 7

This study was supported by the Central Michigan University Office of Research and Graduate Studies.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Some clinicians advocate stretching to prevent muscle cramps. It is unknown whether static or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching increases cramp threshold frequency (TFc), a quantitative measure of cramp susceptibility. Methods: Fifteen individuals completed this randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over study. We measured passive hallux range of motion (ROM) and then performed 3 minutes of either static stretching, PNF stretching (hold–relax—with agonist contraction), or no stretching. ROM was reassessed and TFc was measured. Results: PNF stretching increased hallux extension (pre-PNF 81 ± 11°, post-PNF 90 ± 10°; P < 0.05) but not hallux flexion (pre-PNF 40 ± 7°, post-PNF 40 ± 7°; P > 0.05). Static stretching increased hallux extension (pre-static 80 ± 11°, post-static 88 ± 9°; P < 0.05) but not hallux flexion (pre-static 38 ± 9°, post-static 39 ± 8°; P > 0.05). No ROM changes occurred with no stretching (P > 0.05). TFc was unaffected by stretching (no stretching 18 ± 7 Hz, PNF 16 ± 4 Hz, static 16 ± 5 Hz; P = 0.37). Discussion: Static and PNF stretching increased hallux extension, but neither increased TFc. Acute stretching may not prevent muscle cramping. Muscle Nerve 57: 473–477, 2018

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me