Volume 56, Issue 6 pp. 1168-1171
Short Report

Quantitative electromyography in ambulatory boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Sumit Verma MD

Corresponding Author

Sumit Verma MD

Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30307 USA

Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Correspondence to: S. Verma; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jenny Lin MD

Jenny Lin MD

Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30307 USA

Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Curtis Travers MPH

Curtis Travers MPH

Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30307 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Courtney McCracken PhD

Courtney McCracken PhD

Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30307 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Durga Shah PT, DPT

Durga Shah PT, DPT

Department of Rehabilitation, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 April 2017
Citations: 5

ABSTRACT

Introduction

This study's objective was to evaluate quantitative electromyography (QEMG) using multiple-motor-unit (multi-MUP) analysis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

Methods

Ambulatory DMD boys, aged 5–15 years, were evaluated with QEMG at 6-month intervals over 14 months. EMG was performed in the right biceps brachii (BB) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. Normative QEMG data were obtained from age-matched healthy boys. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed.

Results

Eighteen DMD subjects were enrolled, with a median age of 7 (interquartile range 7–10) years. Six-month evaluations were performed on 14 subjects. QEMG showed significantly abnormal mean MUP duration in BB and TA muscles, with no significant change over 6 months.

Conclusions

QEMG is a sensitive electrophysiological marker of myopathy in DMD. Preliminary data do not reflect a significant change in MUP parameters over a 6-month interval; long-term follow-up QEMG studies are needed to understand its role as a biomarker for disease progression. Muscle Nerve 56: 1361–1364, 2017

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me