Safety and pain in electrodiagnostic studies
Corresponding Author
Zachary N. London MD
University of Michigan, 1324 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109 USA
Correspondence to: Z. London; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zachary N. London MD
University of Michigan, 1324 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109 USA
Correspondence to: Z. London; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Discomfort is an unavoidable part of electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies. The most readily modifiable mediator of electromyography (EMG)-associated pain is muscle selection. Interventions that may reduce pain include vapocoolant spray, ibuprofen, and techniques such as slapping or stretching the skin. Needlestick injuries to health care workers carry the risk of transmitting bloodborne illnesses, but other infectious complications of EDX studies are very rare. EMG probably contributes to asymptomatic hemorrhage in approximately 1% of patients, but clinically significant bleeding has only been reported a few times. Therapeutic anticoagulation does not significantly increase this risk. With standard procedures, there have been no reports of patients developing cardiac arrhythmia from nerve conduction studies. No special precautions are necessary in patients with implantable cardiac devices or intravenous lines. There is a small risk of pneumothorax associated with EMG of the diaphragm and chest wall muscles. Several techniques have been suggested to improve the safety of diaphragm EMG. Muscle Nerve 55: 149–159, 2017
REFERENCES
- 1Kothari MJ, Blakeslee MA, Reichwein R, Simmons Z, Logigian EL. Electrodiagnostic studies: are they useful in clinical practice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1510–1511.
- 2Wee AS, Boyne RL, Abernathy SD, Nick TG. Pain perception to nerve conduction and needle electromyographic procedures. J Miss State Med Assoc 2004; 45: 327–330.
- 3Richardson JK, Evans JE, Warner JH. Information effect on the perception of pain during electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 671–675.
- 4Gans, BM, Kraft GH. Pain perception in clinical electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977; 58: 13–16.
- 5Jerath NU, Strader SB, Reddy CG, Swenson A, Kimura J, Aul E, et al. Factors influencing aversion to specific electrodiagnostic studies. Brain Behav 2014; 4: 698–702.
- 6Barboi AC, Barkhaus PE. Electrodiagnostic testing in neuromuscular disorders. Neurol Clin 2004; 22: 619–641, vi.
- 7Hastings MM, London Z, Callaghan BC, A survey of electrodiagnostic physicians' alteration of needle electromyography examination preactices in response to the perception of patients' pain. In: Poster session presentated at the 58th Annual Meeting American Academy of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, September 14-17, 2011, San Francisco, CA.
- 8London ZN, Hazan R, Burke JF, Callaghan BC. Altering electromyography studies: importance of the electromyographer's perception of patient pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95: 39–42.
- 9Strommen JA, Daube JR. Determinants of pain in needle electromyography. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1414–1418.
- 10Kothari MJ, Blakeslee MA, Reichwein R, Simmons Z, Logigian EL. Electrodiagnostic studies: are they useful in clinical practice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1510–1511.
- 11Alshaikh NM, Martinez JP, Pitt MC. Perception of pain during electromyography in children: a prospective study. Muscle Nerve 2016; 54: 422–426.
- 12London ZN, Burke JF, Hazan R, Hastings MM, Callaghan BC. Electromyography-related pain: muscle selection is the key modifiable study characteristic. Muscle Nerve 2014; 49: 570–574.
- 13Khoshbin S, Hallett M, Lunbeck R. Predictors of patients' experience of pain in EMG. Muscle Nerve 1987; 10: 629–632.
- 14Jan MM, Schwartz M, Benstead TJ. EMG related anxiety and pain: a prospective study. Can J Neurol Sci 1999; 26: 294–297.
- 15Verson J, Haig AJ, Sandella D, Yamakawa KS, London Z, Tomkins-Lane C. Patient perception of pain versus observed pain behavior during a standardized electrodiagnostic test. Muscle Nerve 2015; 51: 185–191.
- 16Yalinay Dikmen P, Ilgaz Aydinlar E, Karlikaya G. Pain levels of examined muscles and gender differences in pain during electromyography. Agri 2015; 27: 79–82.
- 17Dillingham TR, Lauder TD, Andary M, Kumar S, Pezzin LE, Stephens RT, et al. Identifying lumbosacral radiculopathies: an optimal electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79: 496–503.
- 18Dillingham TR, Lauder TD, Andary M, Kumar S, Pezzin LE, Stephens RT, et al. Identification of cervical radiculopathies: optimizing the electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 84–91.
- 19Spence WR, Guyton JD. Control of pain during electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1966; 47: 771–775.
- 20Sherman HB, Walker FO, Donofrio PD. Sensitivity for detecting fibrillation potentials: a comparison between concentric and monopolar needle electrodes. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13: 1023–1026.
- 21Walker WC, Keyser-Marcus LA, Johns JS, Seel RT. Relation of electromyography-induced pain to type of recording electrodes. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 417–420.
- 22Sener HO, Gokdemir O, Mutluer N. EMG needle causes severer pain in the end-plate region compared to the silent site of the muscle. Eur Neurol 2000; 44: 219–221.
- 23Moon YE, Kim SH, Choi WH. Comparison of the effects of vapocoolant spray and topical anesthetic cream on pain during needle electromyography in the medial gastrocnemius. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 919–924.
- 24Denys EH. AAEM minimonograph #14: the influence of temperature in clinical neurophysiology. Muscle Nerve 1991; 14: 795–811.
- 25El-Salem K, Shakhatreh M. Prospective double-blind crossover trial of ibuprofen in reducing EMG pain. Muscle Nerve 2008; 38: 1016–1020.
- 26Kalantar SS, Abbasi M, Faghihi-Kashani S, Majedi H, Ahmadi M, Agah E, et al. Paracetamol 325 mg/tramadol 37.5 mg effect on pain during needle electromyography: a double-blind crossover clinical trial. Acta Neurol Belg 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
- 27Pohl M, Rösler A, Sünkeler I, Braune HJ, Oertel WH, Lautenbacher S. Insertion pain in needle electromyography can be reduced by simultaneous finger slapping. Neurology 2000; 54: 1201–1202.
- 28Park JS. [The effect of cutaneous stimulation on AV fistula puncture pain of hemodialysis patients]. Taehan Kanho 1994; 33: 37–51.
- 29Venkatesh Y, Raheja D. Does stretching the skin before needle insertion reduce the pain of electromyography? In: Poster session presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine; September 6-9, 2010, Quebec City, QC, 2010.
- 30Annaswamy TM, Morchower AH. Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain during needle electromyography. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: 961–968.
- 31Slack D, Nelson L, Patterson D, Burns S, Hakimi K, Robinson L. The feasibility of hypnotic analgesia in ameliorating pain and anxiety among adults undergoing needle electromyography. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 88: 21–29.
- 32Smith MJ, Tong HC. Manual acupuncture for analgesia during electromyography: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1741–1744.
- 33Lamarche Y, Lebel M, Martin R. EMLA partially relieves the pain of EMG needling. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 805–808.
- 34Kaplan RM, Metzger G, Jablecki C. Brief cognitive and relaxation training increases tolerance for a painful clinical electromyographic examination. Psychosom Med 1983; 45: 155–162.
- 35Abraham A, Drory VE. Listening to music during electromyography does not influence the examinee's anxiety and pain levels. Muscle Nerve 2014; 50: 445–447.
- 36Nolan CM, Hashisaki PA, Dundas DF. An outbreak of soft-tissue infections due to Mycobacterium fortuitum associated with electromyography. J Infect Dis 1991; 163: 1150–1153.
- 37Burris JF, Fairchild PG. Iatrogenic hand injuries in outpatients. South Med J 1986: 79: 1515–1516.
- 38Elek SD. Experimental staphylococcal infections in the skin of man. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1956; 65: 85–90.
- 39Koivisto VA, Felig P. Is skin preparation necessary before insulin injection? Lancet 1978; 1: 1072–1075.
- 40O'Neill J, Grinager H, Smith SD, Sibley S, Harrison AR, Lee MS. Isopropyl alcohol skin antisepsis does not reduce incidence of infection following insulin injection. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41: 755–756.
- 41Twitchell KT. Bloodborne pathogens. What you need to know--part I. AAOHN J 2003; 51: 38–45; quiz 46–47.
- 42Update: universal precautions for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and other bloodborne pathogens in health-care settings. N Y State J Med 1988; 88: 649–651.
- 43Recommendations for protection against viral hepatitis. Recommendation of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health and Human Services. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103: 391–402.
- 44 AIDS: recommendations & guidelines (Nov. 1982-Nov. 1986). Health-care workers and laboratory personnel. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control. Ohio Med 1987; 83: 698–699, 701.
- 45Recommendations for preventing transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus to patients during exposure-prone invasive procedures. Centers for Disease Control. Bull Am Coll Surg 1991; 76: 29–37.
- 46Mast ST, Woolwine JD, Gerberding JL. Efficacy of gloves in reducing blood volumes transferred during simulated needlestick injury. J Infect Dis 1993; 168: 1589–1592.
- 47Dalakas MC, Illa I, Dambrosia JM, Soueidan SA, Stein DP, Otero C, Dinsmore ST, et al. A controlled trial of high-dose intravenous immune globulin infusions as treatment for dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1993–2000.
- 48Korniewicz DM, El-Masri M, Broyles JM, Martin CD, O'connell K'P Performance of latex and nonlatex medical examination gloves during simulated use. Am J Infect Control 2002; 30: 133–138.
- 49Rego A, Roley L. In-use barrier integrity of gloves: latex and nitrile superior to vinyl. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27: 405–410.
- 50 American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Risks in electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve Suppl 1999; 8: S53–S69.
- 51Mateen FJ, Grant IA, Sorenson EJ. Needlestick injuries among electromyographers. Muscle Nerve 2008; 38: 1541–1545.
- 52Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L; Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(Suppl 2): S65–S164.
- 53Ridzon R, Gallagher K, Ciesielski C, Ginsberg MB, Robertson BJ, Luo CC, et al. Simultaneous transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus from a needle-stick injury. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 919–922.
- 54Berry AJ. Needle stick and other safety issues. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2004; 22: 493–508, vii.
- 55Keenan PA, Keenan JM, Branson BM. Rapid HIV testing. Wait time reduced from days to minutes. Postgrad Med 2005; 117: 47–52.
- 56Shivkumar S, Peeling R, Jafari Y, Joseph L, Pant Pai N. Accuracy of rapid and point-of-care screening tests for hepatitis C: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157: 558–566.
- 57Smith J. The practice of venepuncture in lymphoedema. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 1998; 7: 97–98.
- 58Clark B, Sitzia J, Harlow W. Incidence and risk of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer: a three-year follow-up study. QJM 2005; 98: 343–348.
- 59Winge C, Mattiasson AC, Schultz I. After axillary surgery for breast cancer--is it safe to take blood samples or give intravenous infusions? J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 1270–1274.
- 60Cole T. Risks and benefits of needle use in patients after axillary node surgery. Br J Nurs 2006; 15: 969–974, 976–979.
- 61Woolfrey PG, Kirby RL. Hypodermic needles in the neuropathic foot of a patient with diabetes. CMAJ 1998; 158: 765–767.
- 62Al-Shekhlee A, Shapiro BE, Preston DC. Iatrogenic complications and risks of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2003; 27: 517–526.
- 63Farrell CM, Rubin DI, Haidukewych GJ. Acute compartment syndrome of the leg following diagnostic electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2003; 27: 374–377.
- 64Vaienti L, Vourtsis S, Urzola V. Compartment syndrome of the forearm following an electromyographic assessment. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30: 656–657.
- 65Caress JB, Rutkove SB, Carlin M, Khoshbin S, Preston DC. Paraspinal muscle hematoma after electromyography. Neurology 1996; 47: 269–272.
- 66Gertken JT, Hunt CH, Chinea NI, Morris JM, Sorenson EJ, Boon AJ. Risk of hematoma following needle electromyography of the paraspinal muscles. Muscle Nerve 2011; 44: 439–440.
- 67London Z, Quint DJ, Haig AJ, Yamakawa KS. The risk of hematoma following extensive electromyography of the lumbar paraspinal muscles. Muscle Nerve 2012; 46: 26–30.
- 68Butler ML, Dewan RW. Subcutaneous hemorrhage in a patient receiving anticoagulant therapy: an unusual EMG complication. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984; 65: 733–734.
- 69Baba Y, Hentschel K, Freeman WD, Broderick DF, Wszolek ZK. Large paraspinal and iliopsoas muscle hematomas. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 1306.
- 70Rosioreanu A, Dickson A, Lypen S, Katz DS. Pseudoaneurysm of the calf after electromyography: sonographic and CT angiographic diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 282–283.
- 71Crisan E, Patil V, Chawla J. Gluteal hematoma after needle electromyography examination of the glueal medius muscle. Muscle Nerve 2013. Suppl.
- 72Gruis KL, Little AA, Zebarah VA, Albers JW. Survey of electrodiagnostic laboratories regarding hemorrhagic complications from needle electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2006; 34: 356–358.
- 73Lynch SL, Boon AJ, Smith J, Harper CM Jr, Tanaka EM. Complications of needle electromyography: hematoma risk and correlation with anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. Muscle Nerve 2008; 38: 1225–1230.
- 74Boon AJ, Gertken JT, Watson JC, Laughlin RS, Strommen JA, Mauermann ML, et al. Hematoma risk after needle electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2012; 45: 9–12.
- 75Gertken JT, Patel AT, Boon AJ. Electromyography and anticoagulation. PM R 2013; 5(Suppl): S3–S7.
- 76Starmer CF, McIntosh HD, Whalen RE. Electrical hazards and cardiovascular function. N Engl J Med 1971; 284: 181–186.
- 77 American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Risks in electrodiagnsotic medicine. Muscle Nerve Suppl 1999; 8: S53–S69.
- 78Merkel R, Sovie MD Electrocution hazards with transvenous pacemaker electrodes. Am J Nurs 1968; 68: 2560–2563.
- 79Mellion ML, Buxton AE, Iyer V, Almahameed S, Lorvidhaya P, Gilchrist JM. Safety of nerve conduction studies in patients with peripheral intravenous lines. Muscle Nerve 2010; 42: 189–191.
- 80Wicks JM, Davison R, Belic N. Malfunction of a demand pacemaker caused by phrenic nerve stimulation. Chest 1978; 74: 303–305.
- 81O'Flaherty D, Adams AP. Pacemaker failure and peripheral nerve stimulation. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 181.
- 82LaBan MM, Petty D, Hauser AM, Taylor RS. Peripheral nerve conduction stimulation: its effect on cardiac pacemakers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 358–362.
- 83Schoeck AP, Mellion ML, Gilchrist JM, Christian FV. Safety of nerve conduction studies in patients with implanted cardiac devices. Muscle Nerve 2007; 35: 521–524.
- 84Cronin EM, Gray J, Abi-Saleh B, Wilkoff BL, Levin KH. Safety of repetitive nerve stimulation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Muscle Nerve 2013; 47: 840–844.
- 85Madigan JD, Choudhri AF, Chen J, Spotnitz HM, Oz MC, Edwards N. Surgical management of the patient with an implanted cardiac device: implications of electromagnetic interference. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 639–647.
- 86Ohira M, Silcox J, Haygood D, Harper-King V, Alsharabati M, Lu L, et al. Electromyography tests in patients with implanted cardiac devices are safe regardless of magnet placement. Muscle Nerve 2013; 47: 17–22.
- 87Honet JE, Honet JC, Cascade P. Pneumothorax after electromyographic electrode insertion in the paracervical muscles: case report and radiographic analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 601–603.
- 88Miller J. Pneumothorax. Complication of needle EMG of thoracic wall. N Engl J Med 1990; 87: 653.
- 89Podnar S. Pneumothorax after needle electromyography of the diaphragm: a case report. Neurol Sci 2013; 34: 1243–1245.
- 90Reinstein L, Twardzik FG, Mech KF Jr. Pneumothorax: a complication of needle electromyography of the supraspinatus muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 561–562.
- 91Wassinger CA, Osborne H, Ribeiro DC. Traumatic pneumothorax sustained via fine-wire electromyography insertion at the shoulder. Physiotherapy 2011; 97: 357–359.
- 92Unluer EE, Akyol PY, Karagöz A, Bılgın S. A deadly complication of superficial muscular needle electromyography: bilateral pneumothoraces. Case Rep Med 2013; 2013: 861787.
- 93Kassardjian CD, O'gorman CM, Sorenson EJ. The risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax after electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2016; 53: 518–521.
- 94Chen R, Collins SJ, Remtulla H, Parkes A, Bolton CF. Needle EMG of the human diaphragm: power spectral analysis in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 1996; 19: 324–330.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199603)19:3<324::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-F CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 95McKeown MJ, Bolton CF. Electromyography of the diaphragm in neuromuscular disease. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21: 954–957.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199807)21:7<954::AID-MUS18>3.0.CO;2-Q CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 96Sander HW, Saadeh PB, Chandswang N, Greenbaum D, Chokroverty S. Diaphragmatic denervation in intensive care unit patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 39: 3–5.
- 97Spitzer AR, Giancarlo T, Maher L, Awerbuch G, Bowles A. Neuromuscular causes of prolonged ventilator dependency. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15: 682–686.
- 98Maher J, Rutledge F, Remtulla H, Parkes A, Bernardi L, Bolton CF. Neuromuscular disorders associated with failure to wean from the ventilator. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21: 737–743.
- 99Bolton CF, et al. Needle electromyography of the diaphragm. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15: 678–681.
- 100Bolton CF. AAEM minimonograph #40: clinical neurophysiology of the respiratory system. Muscle Nerve 1993; 16: 809–818.
- 101Pitt MC. An algorithm for the safety of costal diaphragm electromyography derived from ultrasound. Muscle Nerve 2013; 48: 996–997.
- 102Saadeh PB, Crisafulli CF, Sosner J, Wolf E. Needle electromyography of the diaphragm: a new technique. Muscle Nerve 1993; 16: 15–20.
- 103Saadeh PB, Saadeh PB. An algorithm for the safety of costal diaphragm electromyography derived from ultrasound. Muscle Nerve 2013; 48: 464–465.
- 104Chiodo A, Goodmurphy C, Haig A. Diaphragm needle placement techniques evaluated in cadaveric specimens. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1150–1152.
- 105Shahgholi L, Baria MR, Sorenson EJ, Harper CJ, Watson JC, Strommen JA, et al. Diaphragm depth in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 2014; 49: 666–6668.
- 106Boon AJ, Alsharif KI, Harper CM, Smith J. Ultrasound-guided needle EMG of the diaphragm: technique description and case report. Muscle Nerve 2008; 38: 1623–1626.
- 107Amirjani N, Hudson AL, Butler JE, Gandevia SC. An algorithm for the safety of costal diaphragm electromyography derived from ultrasound. Muscle Nerve 2012: 46: 856–860.
- 108Podnar S, Doorduin J. Safety of needle electromyography of the diaphragm: Anterior lung margins in quietly breathing healthy subjects. Muscle Nerve 2016; 54: 54–57.