Volume 54, Issue 3 pp. 371-377
AANEM Practice Topic

Electrodiagnostic reference values for upper and lower limb nerve conduction studies in adult populations

Shan Chen MD, PhD

Shan Chen MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Andary MD, MS

Michael Andary MD, MS

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ralph Buschbacher MD

Ralph Buschbacher MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David Del Toro MD

David Del Toro MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Benn Smith MD

Benn Smith MD

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Yuen So MD

Yuen So MD

Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kuno Zimmermann DO, PhD

Kuno Zimmermann DO, PhD

Qinqunxx Institute, Rosharon, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy R. Dillingham MD

Corresponding Author

Timothy R. Dillingham MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania, 1800 Lombard Street, First Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146 USA

Correspondence to: T.R. Dillingham; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 May 2016
Citations: 154

Disclaimer: This article was prepared and reviewed by the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) and did not undergo separate peer review by Muscle & Nerve. Reviewed by the AANEM Practice Issue Review Panel, April 2016. Approved by the AANEM Board of Directors, April 2016.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: To address the need for greater standardization within the field of electrodiagnostic medicine, the Normative Data Task Force (NDTF) was formed to identify nerve conduction studies (NCS) in the literature, evaluate them using consensus-based methodological criteria derived by the NDTF, and identify those suitable as a resource for NCS metrics. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted of published peer-reviewed scientific articles for 11 routinely performed sensory and motor NCS from 1990 to 2012. Results: Over 7,500 articles were found. After review using consensus-based methodological criteria, only 1 study each met all quality criteria for 10 nerves. Conclusion: The NDTF selected only those studies that met all quality criteria and were considered suitable as a clinical resource for NCS metrics. The literature is, however, limited and these findings should be confirmed by larger, multicenter collaborative efforts. Muscle Nerve 54: 371–377, 2016

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me