Volume 44, Issue 4 pp. 583-586
Main Article

Avoiding false-negative nerve conduction study in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

Sun Jae Won MD

Sun Jae Won MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, 80 Guro Gu, Guro Dong, Seoul, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Joon Shik Yoon MD

Corresponding Author

Joon Shik Yoon MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, 80 Guro Gu, Guro Dong, Seoul, South Korea

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, 80 Guro Gu, Guro Dong, Seoul, South KoreaSearch for more papers by this author
Jun Yeon Kim MD

Jun Yeon Kim MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, 80 Guro Gu, Guro Dong, Seoul, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Sei Joo Kim MD

Sei Joo Kim MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, 80 Guro Gu, Guro Dong, Seoul, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Jin Seok Jeong MD

Jin Seok Jeong MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, 80 Guro Gu, Guro Dong, Seoul, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 April 2011
Citations: 15

Abstract

Introduction:

Ulnar nerve displacement at the elbow causes overestimation of nerve conduction velocity. We hypothesized that this overestimation may cause false-negative results when the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) diagnostic criteria are used.

Methods:

We investigated 9 cases of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, all having ulnar nerve displacement confirmed by ultrasonography and meeting none or just one of the AANEM criteria with distance measurement by anatomic landmarks. First, the distance across the elbow segment was measured by anatomic landmarks, and then it was re-estimated by ultrasonography.

Results:

Overestimated ulnar conduction velocity was corrected by 7.9 m/s. Three cases met none of the AANEM criteria before correction. After correction of overestimation, all cases met two of the AANEM criteria.

Conclusion:

This study highlights the importance of using ultrasonography to confirm the possibility of ulnar nerve displacement, especially when electrodiagnostic findings do not meet AANEM criteria in patients with suspected UNE. Muscle Nerve, 2011

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me