Volume 43, Issue 6 pp. 812-817
Main Article

Electrodiagnostic consultation and identification of neuromuscular conditions in persons with diabetes

Min-Woong Sohn PhD

Corresponding Author

Min-Woong Sohn PhD

Center for Management of Complex Chronic Care, Hines VA Hospital, 5000 South 5th Avenue (151H), Hines, Illinois 60141, USA

Center for Management of Complex Chronic Care, Hines VA Hospital, 5000 South 5th Avenue (151H), Hines, Illinois 60141, USASearch for more papers by this author
Jeff Whittle MD, MPH

Jeff Whittle MD, MPH

Division of Primary Care, Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Liliana E. Pezzin PhD

Liliana E. Pezzin PhD

Department of Medicine and the Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Haiyan Miao MS

Haiyan Miao MS

Department of Medicine and the Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy R. Dillingham MD, MS

Timothy R. Dillingham MD, MS

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin and Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 May 2011
Citations: 4

Disclosure: The opinions reflected in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. Government.

Abstract

Introduction: Although the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine recommends that electrodiagnostic procedures should be performed by physicians with specialty training, these procedures are increasingly being performed by non-specialists. Methods: We used a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes who used electrodiagnostic services in 2006 to examine whether specialists and non-specialists were different in the rates of identifying common neuromuscular conditions. Results: Specialists (neurologists and physiatrists) performed 62% of electrodiagnostic consultations; non-specialist physicians and non-physicians performed 31% and 5%, respectively. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, diabetes severity, and comorbidities, specialists were 1.26–9 times more likely than non-physicians to diagnose polyneuropathy, lumbosacral radiculopathy, cervical radiculopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, and ulnar neuropathy. Almost 80% of electrodiagnostic studies performed by specialists included electromyography testing; fewer than 13% by non-specialists did. Conclusions: Inadequate use of electromyography and fewer specific diagnoses suggest that many non-specialists perform insufficiently comprehensive electrodiagnostic studies. Muscle Nerve, 2011

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me