Volume 30, Issue 4 pp. 470-480
Main Articles

Myofiber adaptational response to exercise in a mouse model of nemaline myopathy

Visalini Nair-Shalliker MSc

Visalini Nair-Shalliker MSc

Muscle Development Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Anthony J. Kee PhD

Anthony J. Kee PhD

Muscle Development Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Josephine E. Joya DVM

Josephine E. Joya DVM

Muscle Development Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Christina A. Lucas PhD

Christina A. Lucas PhD

Department of Physiology and Institute for Biomedical Research, Building F13, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph F. Hoh PhD

Joseph F. Hoh PhD

Department of Physiology and Institute for Biomedical Research, Building F13, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Edna C. Hardeman PhD

Corresponding Author

Edna C. Hardeman PhD

Muscle Development Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia

Muscle Development Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 15 September 2004
Citations: 20

Abstract

In some muscle diseases, such as muscular dystrophy, exercise can increase muscle damage and alter myofiber adaptation. We determined whether this is also true for the congenital muscle disease nemaline myopathy using our mouse model of this disease. Nemaline mice expressing a mutant α-tropomyosinslow protein [α-Tmslow(Met9Arg)] in skeletal muscle underwent 4 weeks of treadmill exercise. Exercise increased slow/oxidative myofibers, but different fibers were involved in these transformations in nemaline mice. Despite similar expression of the mutant α-Tmslow protein in muscles of the nemaline mouse, muscles responded in a unique manner that did not reflect fiber-type composition. For example, the particular fibers involved in fast-to-slow transformation were specific for each muscle examined. In contrast to the muscular dystrophies, exercise did not result in muscle damage nor did it cause an increase in rod-containing fibers; however, the fiber-type distribution of rod-containing fibers was altered in a muscle-specific fashion. That exercise did not exacerbate the pathology (i.e., nemaline rod formation) supports its use in nemaline myopathy patients. This study shows that fibers of a similar type respond to increased activity differently in different muscles and suggests that fibers of similar type may be functionally distinct in different muscles. Muscle Nerve 30: 470–480, 2004

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me