Dipolar source modeling of the P300 event-related potential after somatosensory stimulation
Corresponding Author
Massimiliano Valeriani MD, PhD
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanità, via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy
Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanità, via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorLucia Fraioli DSc
Center Hospital, Tosinvest Sanità, Cassino, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesca Ranghi DSc
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanità, via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorSalvatore Giaquinto MD
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanità, via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy
Center Hospital, Tosinvest Sanità, Cassino, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Massimiliano Valeriani MD, PhD
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanità, via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy
Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanità, via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorLucia Fraioli DSc
Center Hospital, Tosinvest Sanità, Cassino, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesca Ranghi DSc
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanità, via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorSalvatore Giaquinto MD
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Pisana, Tosinvest Sanità, via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy
Center Hospital, Tosinvest Sanità, Cassino, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The cerebral generators of the P300 potential evoked by somatosensory stimuli were investigated. Event-related potentials elicited by an oddball paradigm were recorded in 15 healthy subjects by 19 scalp electrodes. Nontarget and target electric stimuli were delivered on the anterior surface of the left elbow and of the wrist, respectively. Target traces showed an N140 potential followed by a widely distributed P300 response. Dipolar source modeling of target traces resulted in a six-dipole model. In the earlier latency range (up to 200 ms), one dipole in the contralateral perirolandic region and two dipoles in the parasylvian cortex of both hemispheres were activated. Two dipolar sources located bilaterally in the medial temporal region (MTR) showed their maximal activity at the P300 latency. Finally, a dipole in the contralateral frontal lobe was activated both at the latency of the N140 response and after 200 ms. It was found that two symmetrical MTR sources and a frontal dipole contributed to P300 generation. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 24: 1677–1686, 2001
REFERENCES
- 1Allison T, McCarthy G, Wood CC. The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 301–314.
- 2Anderer P, Pascual-Marqui RD, Semlitsch HV, Saletu B. Electrical sources of P300 event-related brain potentials revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography. Neuropsychobiology 1998; 37: 20–27.
- 3Barrett G, Nishige R, Shibasaki H. Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 66: 409–419.
- 4Baudena P, Halgren E, Heit G, Clarke JM. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 94: 251–264.
- 5Berg P, Kakigi R, Scherg M, Dobel C, Zobel E. Source modelling of the EEG and MEG oddball response in a subject with a large P300. In: C Barber, GG Celesia, I Hashimoto, R Kakigi, editors. Functional neuroscience: evoked potentials and magnetic fields. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999. p 189–193.
- 6Bruyant P, Garcia-Larrea L, Mauguière F. Target side scalp topography of the somatosensory P300. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 88: 468–477.
- 7Clark VP, Fannon S, Lai S, Benson R, Bauer L. Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. J Neurophysiol 2000; 83: 3133–3139.
- 8Desmedt JE, Debecker J. Wave form and neural mechanism of the decision P350 elicited without pre-stimulus CNV or readiness potential in random sequences of near-threshold auditory clicks and finger stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1979; 47: 648–670.
- 9Ebmeier KP, Steele JD, MacKenzie DM, O'Carrol RE, Kydd RR, Glabus MF, Blaskwood DHR, Rugg MD, Goodwin GM. Cognitive brain potentials and regional cerebral blood flow equivalents during two- and three-sound auditory “oddball tasks.” Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 95: 434–443.
- 10Ford JM, Sullivan EV, Marsh L, White PM, Lim KO, Pfefferbaum A. The relationship between P300 amplitude and regional grey matter volumes depends upon the attentional system engaged. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 90: 214–228.
- 11Goodin DS. Clinical utility of long latency “cognitive” event-related potentials (P3): the pros. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 76: 2–5.
- 12Halgren E, Baudena P, Clarke JM, Heit G, Liegeois-Chauvel C, Chauvel P, Musolino A. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 94: 191–220.
- 13Halgren E, Baudena P, Clarke JM, Heit G, Marinkovic K, Devaux B, Vignal J-P, Biraben A. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 94: 229–250.
- 14Halgren E, Stapleton GN, Smith M, Altafullah I. Generators of the human scalp P3. In: RQ Cracco, I Bodis-Wollner, editors. Evoked potentials. New York: Liss; 1986. p 269–284.
- 15Hari R, Reinikainen K, Kaukoranta E, Hämäläinen N, Ilmoniemi R, Penttinen A, Salminen J, Teszner J. Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 57: 254–263.
- 16Hegerl U, Frodl-Bauch T. Dipole source analysis of P300 component of the auditory evoked potential: a methodological advance? Psychiatry Res 1997; 74: 109–118.
- 17Helmohltz H. Über einige Gesetze der Verteilung elektrischer Ströme in köperlichen Leitern, mit Anwendung auf die thierischelektrische Versuche. Ann Phys Chem 1853; 29: 353–377.
10.1002/andp.18531650702 Google Scholar
- 18Johnson R. Developmental evidence for modality-dependent P300 generators: a normative study. Psychophysiology 1989; 26: 651–667.
- 19Johnson R. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 1993; 30: 90–97.
- 20Johnson R. On the neural generators of the P300: evidence from temporal lobectomy patients. In: G Karmos, M Molnar, V Csepe, I Czigler, JE Desmedt, editors. Perspectives of event-related potentials research. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1995. p 110–129.
- 21Johnson R, Miltner W, Braun C. Auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: I. Effects of attention. J Psychophysiol 1991; 5: 11–25.
- 22Kakigi R. Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following median nerve stimulation. Neurosci Res 1994; 20: 165–174.
- 23Kiss I, Dashieff RM, Lordeon P. A parieto-occipital generator for P300: evidence from human intracranial recordings. Int J Neurosci 1989; 49: 133–139.
- 24Knight RT. Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature 1996; 383: 256–259.
- 25Knight RT, Scabini D, Woods DL, Clayworth CC. Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3. Brain Res 1989; 502: 109–116.
- 26Linden DE, Prvulovic D, Formisano E, Vollinger M, Zanella FE, Goebel R, Dierks T. The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9: 815–823.
- 27Mauguière F, Merlet I, Forss N, Vanni S, Jousmäki V, Adeleine P, Hari R. Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: Location and activation timing of SEF sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 104: 281–289.
- 28McCarthy G, Luby M, Gore J, Goldman-Rakic P. Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. J Neurophysiol 1997; 77: 1630–1634.
- 29McCarthy G, Wood CC. Intracranial recordings of endogenous ERPs in humans. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1987. p 331–337.
- 30McCarthy G, Wood CC, Williamson PD, Spencer DD. Task-dependent field potentials in human hippocampal formation. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 4253–4268.
- 31Menon V, Ford JM, Lim KO, Glover GH, Pfefferbaum A. Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporo-parietal cortex activation during target detection. Neuroreport 1997; 8: 3029–3037.
- 32Nishitani N, Ikeda A, Nagamine T, Honda M, Mikuni N, Taki W, Kimura J, Shibasaki H. The role of the hippocampus in auditory processing studied by event-related electric potentials and magnetic fields in epilepsy patients before and after temporal lobectomy. Brain 1999; 122: 687–707.
- 33Onofrj MC, Fulgente T, Nobilio D, Bazzano S, Colamartino P. Mapping of event-related potentials to auditory and visual oddball paradigms in controls. Eur Neurol 1991; 31: 220–228.
- 34Onofrj MC, Fulgente T, Nobilio D, Malatesta G, Bazzano S, Colamartino P, Gambi D. P3 recordings in patients with bilateral temporal lobe lesions. Neurology 1992; 42: 1762–1767.
- 35Opitz B, Mecklinger A, Friederici AD, Von Cramon DY. The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integration of ERP and fMRI results. Cerebr Cortex 1999; 9: 379–391.
- 36Opitz B, Mecklinger A, Von Cramon DY, Kruggel F. Comining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. Psychophysiology 1999; 36: 142–147.
- 37Perrault N, Picton TW. Event-related potentials recorded from the scalp and nasopharynx. II. N2, P3 and slow wave. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 59: 261–278.
- 38Perrin F, Pernier G, Bertrand O, Giard MH, Echallier JF. Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 66: 75–81.
- 39Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Kraemer HC. Clinical utility of long latency “cognitive” event-related potentials (P3): the cons. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 76: 6–12.
- 40Scherg M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: F Grandoni, M Hoke, GL Romani, editors. Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electric potentials. Advances in audiology. Basel: Karger; 1990. p 40–69.
- 41Simpson GV, Scherg M, Ritter W, Vaughan HG. Localization and temporal activity functions of brain sources generating the human visual ERP. In: CHN Brunia, AWK Gaillard, A Kok, editors. Psychophysical brain research. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press; 1990. p 99–105.
- 42Smith ME, Halgren E, Sokolik M, Baudena P, Musolino A, Liegeois-Chauvel C, Chauvel P. The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 76: 235–248.
- 43Smith ME, Stapleton JM, Halgren E. Human medial temporal lobe potentials evoked in memory and language tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986; 63: 145–159.
- 44Snyder AZ. Dipole source localization in the study of EP generators: a critique. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 80: 321–325.
- 45Strik WK, Fallgatter AJ, Brandeis D, Pascual-Marqui RD. Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 108: 406–413.
- 46Tarkka IM, Micheloyannis S, Stokic DS. Generators for human P300 elicited by somatosensory stimuli using multiple dipole source analysis. Neuroscience 1996; 75: 275–287.
- 47Tarkka IM, Stokic DS, Basile LFH, Papanicolaou AC. Electric source localization of the auditory P300 agrees with magnetic source localization. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 538–545.
- 48Valeriani M, Le Pera D, Niddam D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Chen A. Dipolar source modelling of painful and nonpainful somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 1194–1203.
- 49Valeriani M, Le Pera D, Tonali P. Characterizing SEP sources with dipole models — advantages and limitations. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 325–339.
- 50Valeriani M, Restuccia D, Di Lazzaro V, Le Pera D, Barba C, Tonali P, Mauguièere F. Dipolar sources of the early scalp somatosensory evoked potentials to upper limb stimulation. Effect of increasing stimulus rates. Exp Brain Res 1998; 120: 306–315.
- 51Vaughan HG, Ritter W, Simpson R. Neurophysiological considerations in event-related potential research. In: WR Gaillard, W Ritter, editors. Tutorials in event-related potential research: endogenous components. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1983. p 1–7.
10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62032-4 Google Scholar
- 52Velasco M, Velasco F, Velasco AL, Almanza X, Olvera A. Subcortical correlates of the P300 potential complex in man to auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986; 64: 199–210.
- 53Verleger R, Heide W, Butt C, Kömpf D. Reduction of the P3b in patients with temporo-parietal lesions. Cogn Brain Res 1994; 2: 103–116.
- 54Yamaguchi S, Knight RT. Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300. J Neurosci 1991; 11: 2039–2054.
- 55Yingling CD, Hosobuchi Y. A subcortical correlate of P300 in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 59: 72–76.