Volume 75, Issue 1 pp. 207-216
Full Paper

Model predictive filtering MR thermometry: Effects of model inaccuracies, k-space reduction factor, and temperature increase rate

Henrik Odéen

Corresponding Author

Henrik Odéen

Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Correspondence to: Henrik Odéen, Ph.D., UCAIR, Department of Radiology, 729 Arapeen Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Nick Todd

Nick Todd

Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Dillon

Christopher Dillon

Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Allison Payne

Allison Payne

Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dennis L. Parker

Dennis L. Parker

Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 February 2015
Citations: 5

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluate effects of model parameter inaccuracies (thermal conductivity, k, and ultrasound power deposition density, Q), k-space reduction factor (R), and rate of temperature increase ( urn:x-wiley::media:mrm25622:mrm25622-math-0001) in a thermal model-based reconstruction for MR-thermometry during focused-ultrasound heating.

Methods

Simulations and ex vivo experiments were performed to investigate the accuracy of the thermal model and the model predictive filtering (MPF) algorithm for varying R and urn:x-wiley::media:mrm25622:mrm25622-math-0002, and their sensitivity to errors in k and Q. Ex vivo data was acquired with a segmented EPI pulse sequence to achieve large field-of-view (192 × 162 × 96 mm) four-dimensional temperature maps with high spatiotemporal resolution (1.5 × 1.5 × 2.0 mm, 1.7 s).

Results

In the simulations, 50% errors in k and Q resulted in maximum temperature root mean square errors (RMSE) of 6°C for model only and 3°C for MPF. Using recently developed methods, estimates of k and Q were accurate to within 3%. The RMSE between MPF and true temperature increased with R and urn:x-wiley::media:mrm25622:mrm25622-math-0003. In the ex vivo study the RMSE remained below 0.7°C for R ranging from 4 to 12 and urn:x-wiley::media:mrm25622:mrm25622-math-0004 of 0.28–0.75°C/s.

Conclusion

Errors in MPF temperatures occur due to errors in k and Q. These MPF temperature errors increase with increase in R and urn:x-wiley::media:mrm25622:mrm25622-math-0005, but are smaller than those obtained using the thermal model alone. Magn Reson Med 75:207–216, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.