Volume 64, Issue 6 pp. 1696-1703
Imaging Methodology-Full Papers

Estimates of systolic and diastolic myocardial blood flow by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Aleksandra Radjenovic

Corresponding Author

Aleksandra Radjenovic

School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds LS7 4SA, United Kingdom===Search for more papers by this author
John D. Biglands

John D. Biglands

School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Abdulghani Larghat

Abdulghani Larghat

School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
John P. Ridgway

John P. Ridgway

Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen G. Ball

Stephen G. Ball

School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
John P. Greenwood

John P. Greenwood

School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Jerosch-Herold

Michael Jerosch-Herold

Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sven Plein

Sven Plein

School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 October 2010
Citations: 41

Abstract

Myocardial blood flow varies during the cardiac cycle in response to pulsatile changes in epicardial circulation and cyclical variation in myocardial tension. First-pass assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is one of the most challenging applications of MRI because of the spatial and temporal constraints imposed by the cardiac physiology and the nature of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI signal collection. Here, we describe a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI method for simultaneous assessment of systolic and diastolic myocardial blood flow. The feasibility of this method was demonstrated in a study of 17 healthy volunteers at rest and under adenosine-induced vasodilatory stress. We found that myocardial blood flow was independent of the cardiac phase at rest. However, under adenosine-induced hyperemia, myocardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion reserve were significantly higher in diastole than in systole. Furthermore, the transmural distribution of myocardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion reserve was cardiac phase dependent, with a reversal of the typical subendocardial to subepicardial myocardial blood flow gradient in systole, but not diastole, under stress. The observed difference between systolic and diastolic myocardial blood flow must be taken into account when assessing myocardial blood flow using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Furthermore, targeted assessment of systolic or diastolic perfusion using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI may provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of ischemic and microvascular heart disease. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.