MR pulsatility measurements in peripheral arteries: Preliminary results
Corresponding Author
Barbara Krug MD
Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Institut und Poliklinik für Radiologische Diagnostik der Universität zu Köln, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany===Search for more papers by this authorHarald Kugel
Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorUrs Harnischmacher
the Department of Medical Statistics and Documentation (, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorWalter Heindel
Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorRainer Schmidt
Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorFriedrich Krings
Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Barbara Krug MD
Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Institut und Poliklinik für Radiologische Diagnostik der Universität zu Köln, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany===Search for more papers by this authorHarald Kugel
Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorUrs Harnischmacher
the Department of Medical Statistics and Documentation (, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorWalter Heindel
Department of Radiology, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorRainer Schmidt
Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorFriedrich Krings
Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, D-50924 Köln-Lindenthal, Germany.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Phase contrast flow velocity measurements were performed in six healthy volunteers and 30 patients with arteriosclerotic disease. The iliac arteries were investigated in 8 cases and the femoral arteries in 28 cases. In the first 24 patients, 16 evenly distributed data sets were acquired during one cardiac cycle. In the last 12 patients, a trigger pulse followed by the acquisition of 30 evenly distributed data sets was applied every second heart beat. This procedure allowed data to be acquired over a full heart cycle without any acquisition gap. The measured flow velocities were displayed as function of time. Systolic acceleration, postsystolic deceleration and pulsatility of flow velocity were calculated and compared with stenosis grades determined from DSA angiograms. Flattening of the flow velocity patterns was found to correlate with the local severity of arteriosclerotic disease.
Reference
- 1 D. J. Bryant, I. A. Payne, D. N. Firmin, D. B. Longmoore, Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 8, 588–593 (1984).
- 2 P. Van Dijk, Direct cardiac NMR imaging of heart wall and blood flow velocity. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 8, 429–436 (1984).
- 3 I. R. Young, G. M. Bydder, J. A. Payne, Flow measurement by the development of phase differences during slice formation in MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 3, 175–179 (1986).
- 4 I. P. Arlart, L. Guhl, R. Hausmann, Bewertung der 2D- und 3D-“Time-of-Flight”-Magnet-resonanz-Angiographie (MRA) in der Diagnostik von Nierenarterienstenosen. (Evaluation of 2D- and 3D-time-of-flight-MRA in renal artery stenosis). Fortschr. Röntgenstr. 157, 59–64 (1991).
- 5
G. M. Bongartz,
T. Vestring,
C. Drews,
W. Krings,
P. E. Peters,
Effect of slice orientation in 3D magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the supra-aortic arteries.
Eur. Radiol.
1,
158–164
(1991).
10.1007/BF00451301 Google Scholar
- 6 A. W. Litt, E. M. Eidelma, R. S. Pinto, T. S. Riles, S. J. McLachlan, S. Schwartzenberg, I. I. Weinreb, J. C. Kircheff, Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients. AJNR 12, 149–154 (1991).
- 7 T. J. Masaryk, J. S. Ross, M. T. Modic, G. W. Lenz, E. M. Haacke, Carotid bifurcation: MR imaging. Radiology 166, 461–466 (1988).
- 8 T. J. Masaryk, M. T. Modic, P. M. Ruggieri, J. S. Ross, G. Laub, G. W. Lenz, J. A. Tkach, E. M. Haacke, W. R. Selmann, S. I. Harik, Three-dimensional (volume) gradient-echo imaging of the carotid bifurcation: preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 171, 801–806 (1989).
- 9 H. P. Mattle, K. C. Kent, R. R. Edelman, D. J. Atkinson, J. J. Skillman. Evaluation of the extracranial carotid arteries: correlation of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ul-trasonography, and conventional angiography. J. Vasc. Surg. 13, 838–844 (1991).
- 10 S. A. Mulligan, T. Matsuda, P. Lanzer, G. M. Gross, W. D. Routh, F. S. Keller, D. B. Koslin, L. L. Berland, M. D. Fields, M. Doyle, G. B. Cranney, J. Y. Lee, G. M. Pohost, Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of MR angiography and color Duplex US with conventional angiography. Radiology 178, 695–700 (1991).
- 11 D. N. Firmin, G. L. Nayler, P. J. Kilner, D. B. Longmore, The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurements. Magn. Reson. Med. 14, 230–241 (1990).
- 12 B. Krug, H. Kugel, G. Friedmann, J. Bunke, P. van Dijk, R. Schmidt, H. J. Hirche, MR imaging of poststenotic flow phenomena: experimental studies. JMRI 1, 585–591 (1991).
- 13 F. D. Meier, S. Maier, P. Bösiger, Quantitative flow measurements on phantoms and on blood vessels with MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 8, 25–34 (1988).
- 14 G. R. Caputo, T. Masui, G. A. W. Gooding, J.-M. Chang, C. B. Higgins, Popliteal and tibioperoneal arteries: feasibility of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and phase contrast mapping. Radiology 182, 387–392 (1992).
- 15 V. Dousset, F. W. Wehrli, A. Louis, J. Listerud, Popliteal artery hemodynamics; MR imaging—US correlation. Radiology 179, 437–441 (1991).
- 16 St. A. Carter, Hemodynamic considerations in peripheral and cerebrovascular diseases, in “ Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography” ( W. J. Zwiebel, Ed.), pp. 3–17, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993.
- 17 K. N. Humphries, T. K. Hames, S. W. J. Smith, V. A. Cannon, Quantitative assessment of the common femoral to popliteal arterial segment using continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 6, 99–105 (1980).
- 18 K. A. Jager, D. J. Phillips, R. L. Martin, C. Hanson, G. O. Roederer, Y. E. Langlois, H. J. Ricketts, D. E. Strandness, Noninvasive mapping of lower limb arterial lesions. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 11, 515–521 (1985).
- 19 K. W. Johnston, M. Kassam, J. Koers, R. S. C. Cobbold, D. MacHattie, Comparative study of four methods for quantifying Doppler ultrasound waveforms from the femoral artery. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 10, 1–12 (1984).
- 20 L. Walton, T. R. P. Martin, Prospective assessment of the aorto-iliac segment by visual interpretation of frequency analysed Doppler waveforms—a comparison with arteriography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 10, 27–32 (1984).
- 21 R. E. Zierler, B. K. Zierler, Duplex sonography of lower extremity arteries, in “ Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography” ( W. J. Zwiebel, Ed.), pp. 237–251, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993.
- 22 W. J. Zwiebel, J. A. Zagzebski, A. B. Crummy, M. Hirscher, Correlation of peak Doppler frequency with lumen narrowing in carotid stenosis. Stroke 13, 386–391 (1982).
- 23 W. J. Zwiebel, Spectrum analysis in Doppler vascular diagnosis, in “ Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography” ( W. J. Zwiebel, Ed.), pp. 45–65, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993.
- 24 P. Lanzer, D. Bohning, J. Groen, G. Gross, N. Nanda, G. Pohost, Aortoiliac and femoropopliteal phase-based NMR angiography: a comparison between FLAG and RSE. Magn. Reson. Med. 15, 372–385 (1990).
- 25 G. L. Nayler, D. N. Firmin, D. B. Longmore, Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 10, 715–722 (1986).
- 26 H. G. Bogren, M. H. Buonocore, Blood flow measurements in the aorta and major arteries with MR velocity mapping. JMRI 4, 119–130 (1994).
- 27 M. H. Buonocore, Blood flow measurements using variable velocity encoding in the RR interval. Magn. Reson. Med. 29, 790–795 (1993).
- 28 S. E. Maier, M. B. Scheidegger, L. Tjon-A-Meeuw, K. Liu, E. Schneider, A. Bollinger, P. Boesinger, Flow measurements in the renal arteries, in “Proc., SMRM, 11th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 1991,” p. 991.
- 29 S. E. Maier, M. B. Scheidegger, K. Liu, A. Bollinger, P. Boesiger, In vivo acquisition of accurate velocity patterns in normal and diseased vessels with disturbed flow. Society of Magnetic, in “Proc., SMRM, 11th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 1991,” p. 89.
- 30 R. H. Mohiaddin, D. B. Longmore, MRI studies of atherosclerotic vascular disease: structural evaluation and physiological measurements. Br. Med. Bull. 45, 968–990 (1989).
- 31 M. Koch, S. E. Maier, I. Baumgartner, K. D. Hagspiel, Magnetic resonance angiography and flow quantification in peripheral vessel disease before and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in “Proc., SMRM, 11th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 1991,” p. 137.
- 32 R. A. Meyer, J. M. Foley, S. J. Harkema, A. Sierra, E. J. Potchen, Magnetic resonance measurements of blood flow in peripheral vessels after acute exercise. Magn. Reson. Imaging 11, 1085–1092 (1993).
- 33 L. R. Pelc, N. J. Pelc, St. C. Rayhill, L. J. Castro, G. H. Glover, R. J. Herfkens, D. C. Miller, R. B. Jeffrey, Arterial and venous blood flow: noninvasive quantification with MR imaging. Radiology 185, 809–812 (1992).
- 34 P. M. Brown, K. W. Johnston, M. Kassam, R. S. C. Cobbold, A critical study of ultrasound Doppler spectral analysis for detecting carotid disease. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 8, 515–523 (1982).
- 35 T. K. Hames, K. N. Humphries, D. A. Ratliff, S. J. Birch, V. M. Gazzard, A. D. B. Chant, The validation of duplex scanning and continuous wave Doppler imaging: a comparison with conventional angiography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 6, 927–834 (1985).
- 36 M. Fischer, K. Alexander, Reproducibility of carotid artery Doppler frequency measurements. Stroke 16, 973–976 (1985).
- 37 D. V. Cossman, J. E. Ellison, W. W. Wagner, Comparison of dye arteriography to arterial mapping with color-flow duplex imaging in the lower extremities. J. Vasc. Surg. 10, 522–529 (1989).
- 38 T. R. Kohler, D. R. Nance, M. M. Cramer, Duplex scanning for diagnosis of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal disease: a prospective study. Circulation 76, 1074–1080 (1987).
- 39 W. J. Zwiebel, Spectrum analysis in carotid sonography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 13, 625–636 (1987).
- 40 K. Perktold, Mathematische modellierung von sekundärströmungsphänomenen in abschnitten großer arterien. Hämostaseologie 9, 66–81 (1989).
- 41 H. Schmid-Schönbein, Strömungsseparation als pathogenetisches Prinzip bei Entstehung, Progression und Komplikationen der Atheromatose. Hämostaseologie 9, 3–6 (1989).
- 42 J. A. Zagzebski, Physics and instrumentation in Doppler and B-mode ultrasonography, in “ Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography” ( W. J. Zwiebel, Ed.), pp. 19–43, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993.
- 43 J. Ahuvuo, M. Lepantalo, J. Kinnunen, J. Edgren, H. Linden, O. Saarinen, O. Lindfors, How many projections are really needed in angiographic assessment of the femoral bifurcation? Roentgen-Bl. 43, 530–532 (1990).
- 44 K. F. R. Neufang. Zur Geometrie exzentrischer gefäßste-nosen bei unterschiedlichen Projektionen—Bedeutung für die angiographische beurteilung des stenosegrades, insbesondere mit der digitalen subtraktionsangiographie. (Radiographical appearance of eccentric arterial stenoses—implications for angiographic quantification using digital subtraction angiography.) Digit. Bilddiagn. 6, 187–191 (1986).
- 45 K. E. Garth, B. A. Carroll, F. G. Sommer, D. A. Oppenheimer, Duplex ultrasound scanning of the carotid arteries with velocity spectrum analysis. Radiology 147, 823–827 (1983).
- 46 R. M. Fleming, R. L. Kirkeeide, R. W. Smalling, K. L. Gould, Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 18, 945–951 (1991).
- 47 J. E. Galbraith, M. L. Murphy, N. DeSoya, Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability. JAMA 240, 2053–2056 (1981).
- 48 L. W. Klein, J. B. Agarwal, M. C. Rosenberg, G. Stets, W. S. Wintraub, R. M. Schneider, G. Hermann, R. H. Helfant, Assessment of coronary artery stenoses by digital subtraction angiography: a pathoanatomic validation. Am. Heart J. 113, 1011–1017 (1987).
- 49 R. Vas, N. Eigler, C. Miyazono, J. M. Pfaff, K. J. Resser, M. Weiss, T. Nivatpumin, J. Whiting, J. Forrester, Digital quantification eliminates intraobserver and interobserver variability in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. Am. J. Cordiol. 56, 718–723 (1985).
- 50 Y. Douville, K. W. Johnston, M. Kassam, Determination of the hemodynamic factors which influence the carotid Doppler spectral broadening. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 11, 417–423 (1985).
- 51 C. Clark, The propagation of turbulence produced by a stenosis. J. Biomech. 13, 591–604 (1980).