Volume 14, Issue 2 pp. 102-108
Original Article
Free to Read

Validity and reliability of an inpatient severity of psychiatric illness measure

Bentson H. McFarland

Corresponding Author

Bentson H. McFarland

Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR, USA

Department of Psychiatry CR-139, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland OR 97239, USA.Search for more papers by this author
Anne E. Kovas

Anne E. Kovas

Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Shelby L. Haugan

Shelby L. Haugan

Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Pollack

David A. Pollack

Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jo M. Mahler

Jo M. Mahler

Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 January 2006
Citations: 1

Abstract

Inpatient psychiatric severity measures are often used but few psychometric data are available. This study evaluated the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of a measure used to assess severity of psychiatric illness among inpatients. Using the severity measure, minimally trained raters conducted retrospective patient record reviews to assess medical necessity for psychiatric hospitalization. The data analysis compared 135 civilly committed psychiatric inpatients with a heterogeneous group of 248 psychiatric inpatients at a general hospital. The severity measure showed acceptable inter-rater reliability in both populations. Two-way analysis of variance showed that the intra-class correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.65 for general hospital subjects and 0.63 for civilly committed subjects. Differences in mean scores were substantial (15 out of a possible 75 points for general hospital subjects versus 42 for civilly committed subjects, Mann-Whitney U = 562, p < 0.001). As expected, all civilly committed subjects were well above admission cut-off score of 12, versus only 64% of the general hospital patients. The measure is appropriate for retrospective severity assessment and may also be useful for pre-admission screening. Copyright © 2005 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.