RESEARCH ARTICLE
Inverse problem for a nonlinear third order in time partial differential equation
Ibrahim Tekin,
Corresponding Author
Ibrahim Tekin
Department of Engineering Fundamental Sciences, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey
Correspondence
Ibrahim Tekin, Department of Engineering Fundamental Sciences, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, 07425 Antalya, Turkey.
Email: [email protected]
Communicated by: F. Colombo
Search for more papers by this authorIbrahim Tekin,
Corresponding Author
Ibrahim Tekin
Department of Engineering Fundamental Sciences, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey
Correspondence
Ibrahim Tekin, Department of Engineering Fundamental Sciences, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, 07425 Antalya, Turkey.
Email: [email protected]
Communicated by: F. Colombo
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In this article, we study the inverse problem of recovering a time-dependent coefficient of a nonlinear third order in time partial differential equation (PDE), which is usually referred to as Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation, from knowledge of a one boundary measurement.
REFERENCES
- 1Moore FK, Gibson WE. Propagation of weak disturbances in a gas subject to relaxation effects. J Aerosp Sci. 1960; 27(2): 117-127.
- 2Thompson PA. Compressible-Fluid Dynamics. McGraw-Hill; 1972.
10.1115/1.3422684 Google Scholar
- 3Caixeta AH, Lasiecka I, Cavalcanti VND. Global attractors for a third order in time nonlinear dynamics. J Differ Equa. 2016; 261(1): 113-147.
- 4Conti M, Pata V, Quintanilla R. Thermoelasticity of Moore–Gibson–Thompson type with history dependence in the temperature. Asympt Anal. 2020; 120(1–2): 1-21.
- 5Dell'Oro F, Pata V. On the Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation and its relation to linear viscoelasticity. Appl Math Optim. 2017; 763: 641-655.
- 6Kaltenbacher B, Lasiecka I, Pospieszalska MK. Well-posedness and exponential decay of the energy in the nonlinear Jordan–Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation arising in high intensity ultrasound. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2012; 22(11):1250035.
- 7Kaltenbacher B, Nikolić V. The Jordan–Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation: well-posedness with quadratic gradient nonlinearity and singular limit for vanishing relaxation time. Math Models Methods Appl Scie. 2019; 29(13): 2523-2556.
- 8Kaltenbacher B. Mathematics of nonlinear acoustics. Evol Equa Control Theory. 2015; 4(4): 447-491.
- 9Pellicer M, Said-Houari B. Wellposedness and decay rates for the cauchy problem of the Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation arising in high intensity ultrasound. Appl Math Optim. 2019; 80(2): 447-478.
- 10Taraldsen G. A generalized Westervelt equation for nonlinear medical ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(4): 1329-1333.
- 11Jordan PM. Second-sound phenomena in inviscid, thermally relaxing gases. Discr Contin Dyn Syst-B. 2014; 19(7): 2189.
- 12Kaltenbacher B, Lasiecka I, Marchand R. Wellposedness and exponential decay rates for the Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation arising in high intensity ultrasound. Control Cybern. 2011; 40: 971-988.
- 13Lasiecka Irena. Global solvability of Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation with memory arising in nonlinear acoustics. J Evol Equa. 2017; 17(1): 411-441.
- 14Marchand R, McDevitt T, Triggiani R. An abstract semigroup approach to the third-order Moore–Gibson–Thompson partial differential equation arising in high-intensity ultrasound: structural decomposition, spectral analysis, exponential stability. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2012; 35(15): 1896-1929.
- 15Conejero JA, Lizama C, Ródenas Escribá FDA. Chaotic behaviour of the solutions of the Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation. Appl Math Inform Sci. 2015; 95: 2233-2238.
- 16Kaltenbacher B, Lasiecka I. Exponential decay for low and higher energies in the third order linear Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation with variable viscosity. Palest J Math. 2012; 11: 1-10.
- 17Jordan PM. An analytical study of Kuznetsov's equation: diffusive solitons, shock formation, and solution bifurcation. Phys Lett A. 2004; 326(1–2): 77-84.
- 18Bose SK, Gorain GC. Stability of the boundary stabilised internally damped wave equation y′′ + y′′′ = c2(δy + Δy′) in a bounded domain in . Indian J Math. 1998; 40(1): 1-15.
- 19Pellicer Marta, Solà-Morales J. Optimal scalar products in the Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation. Evol Equa Control Theory. 2019; 8(1): 203.
- 20Beilin S. Existence of solutions for one-dimensional wave equations with nonlocal conditions. Electron J Differ Equa. 2001; 76: 1-8.
- 21Budak BM, Samarskii AA, Tikhonov AN. A Collection of Problems on Mathematical Physics: International Series of Monographs in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 52.Elsevier; 2013.
- 22Zachmanoglou EC, Thoe DW. Introduction to Partial Differential Equations With Applications. Courier Corporation; 1986.
- 23Imanuvilov O, Yamamoto M. Global uniqueness and stability in determining coefficients of wave equations, 26; 2001.
- 24Isakov V. Inverse Problems for Partial Differential Equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences. New York, (NY): Springer; 2006.
- 25Namazov GK. Inverse Problems of the Theory of Equations of Mathematical Physics. Azerbaijan: Baku; 1984. (in Russian).
- 26Prilepko AI, Orlovsky DG, Vasin IA. Methods for Solving Inverse Problems in Mathematical Physics, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 231. New York, (NY): Marcel Dekker; 2000.
- 27Romanov VG. Inverse Problems of Mathematical Physics. Utrecht, Netherlands: VNU Science Press BV; 1987.
- 28Tekin I. Determination of a time-dependent coefficient in a wave equation with unusual boundary condition. Filomat. 2019; 33(9): 2653-2665.
- 29Agrawal Om P. Solution for a fractional diffusion-wave equation defined in a bounded domain. Nonlin Dyn. 2002; 29(1–4): 145-155.
- 30Can NH, Luc NH, Baleanu D, Zhou Y. Inverse source problem for time fractional diffusion equation with Mittag–Leffler kernel. Adv Differ Equa. 2020; 2020(1): 1-18.
- 31Cheng J, Nakagawa J, Yamamoto M, Yamazaki T. Uniqueness in an inverse problem for a one-dimensional fractional diffusion equation. Inverse Problems. 2009; 25(11): 115002.
- 32Gong X, Wei T. Reconstruction of a time-dependent source term in a time-fractional diffusion-wave equation. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2019; 27(11): 1577-1594.
- 33Ismailov MI, Cicek M. Inverse source problem for a time-fractional diffusion equation with nonlocal boundary conditions. Appl Math Modell. 2016; 40(7–8): 4891-4899.
- 34Lopushansky A, Lopushanska H. Inverse source Cauchy problem for a time fractional diffusion-wave equation with distributions. Electronic J Differ Equa. 2017; 182(2017): 1-14.
- 35Luc NH, Huynh LN, Baleanu D, Can NH. Identifying the space source term problem for a generalization of the fractional diffusion equation with hyper-Bessel operator. Adv Differ Equa. 2020; 2020(1): 1-23.
- 36Slodicka M, Siskova K, Van Bockstal K. Uniqueness for an inverse source problem of determining a space dependent source in a time-fractional diffusion equation. Appl Math Lett. 2019; 91: 15-21.
- 37Greiner W. Relativistic Quantum Mechanics-Wave Equations, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2000.
10.1007/978-3-662-04275-5 Google Scholar
- 38Wazwaz A-M. New travelling wave solutions to the Boussinesq and the Klein–Gordon equations. Commun Nonlin Sci Numer Simul. 2008; 13(5): 889-901.
- 39Wazwaz A-M. The tanh method: exact solutions of the sine-Gordon and the sinh-Gordon equations. Appl Math Comput. 2005; 16(2): 1196-1210.
- 40Wazwaz A-M. The integrable time-dependent sine-Gordon equation with multiple optical kink solutions. Optik. 2019; 182: 605-610.
- 41Whitham GB. Linear and Nonlinear Waves. New York: Wiley–Interscience; 1999.
10.1002/9781118032954 Google Scholar
- 42Cannon JR, DuChateau P. An inverse problem for an unknown source term in a wave equation. SIAM J Appl Math. 1983; 43(3): 553-564.
- 43Denisov AM. Inverse problem for a semilinear functional-differential wave equation. J Inverse Ill-posed Probl. 2008; 16(9): 837-848.
- 44Tekin I, Mehraliyev YT, Ismailov MI. Existence and uniqueness of an inverse problem for nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2019; 42(10): 3739-3753.
- 45Liu S, Triggiani R. An inverse problem for a third order PDE arising in high-intensity ultrasound: global uniqueness and stability by one boundary measurement. J Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 2013; 21(6): 825-869.
- 46Lecaros R, Mercado A, Zamorano S. An inverse problem for Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation arising in high intensity ultrasound. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.07673; 2020.
