Funding: The support of University of Cádiz is gratefully acknowledged by the author.
ABSTRACT
The Ostrovsky equation models long, weakly nonlinear waves, explaining the propagation of surface and internal waves in a rotating fluid. The study focuses on the generalized Ostrovsky equation. Introduced by Levandosky and Liu, this equation demonstrates the existence of solitary waves through variational methods. This paper investigates the generalized Ostrovsky equation using Lie symmetry group method and low local conservation laws, essential for analyzing differential equations and describing conserved physical and chemical processes. Specific cases reduce it to the Ostrovsky or generalized Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equations. Detailed calculations of local conservation laws, classical point symmetries, and symmetry reductions are provided, offering invariant solutions and Lie symmetry groups. This research advances the understanding of differential equations and their applications in modeling scientific phenomena.
1 Introduction
The study of nonlinear internal waves in a rotating ocean has been an important area of research in oceanography and fluid dynamics. Ostrosvsky equation was introduced by Ostrovsky in [1] as a model for long waves which are weakly nonlinear, to explain the propagation of the surface and internal waves in a fluid of reference which describe a rotating movement. This paper aims to discuss the generalized Ostrovsky equation by using Lie symmetry group method and low local conservation laws for this equation. Conservation laws are highly significant in the analysis of differential equations because they describe chemical and physical processes with conserved quantities. We study conservation laws for these equations and we resort to the invariance and multiplier perspective by using the Euler–Lagrange operator. In this paper, we consider the generalized Ostrovsky equation.
(1)
where
and
are the real dispersion coefficients and the functions
and
are
functions. This equation was introduced by Levandosky and Liu in [2] when
is the identity function and they proved the existence of solitary waves, called ground states, by employing variational methods. Specifically, in the case
and
, we obtain the Ostrovsky equation
(2)
The function
denotes the free surface of a liquid,
is a measure of rotational effects due to Coriolis force, and
determines the dispersion. Some special cases of the Ostrovsky equation has been investigated by several authors [3-7]. In [8], the authors prove that solutions of this equation converge to solutions of the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation. In [9], Varlamov and Liu proved that (1) has special characteristics in the space
for
. Tsugawa [10] extended the results of Varlamov and Liu for
. In the absence of rotation, that is, when
, we integrate and we obtain the generalized KdV equation:
(3)
The original Ostrovsky equation models the propagation of nonlinear waves in rotating media, such as oceans and the atmosphere. However, this formulation may be insufficient to describe scenarios where dispersion and nonlinearity vary more complexly. The generalized version allows for additional terms that can represent more realistic physical effects, such as spatial and temporal variations in dispersion or more sophisticated wave interactions. Moreover, studying this version expands knowledge of nonlinear differential equations and their exact solutions, which can be applied in both numerical and theoretical fluid dynamics models.
In the current paper, we have studied (1) using Lie symmetry reductions, symmetry group, and a lot of conservative laws for them [11-13]. Partial differential equations describe several scientific processes, such as the heat equation [14] and other chemical or physical processes [15, 16]. Numerous solutions of differential equations have been obtained by several methods [17], such as the direct method [18], simplest equation method [19], the tanh method [20], or the homogeneous balanced method [21]. An important and efficient method to study differential equations is the Lie group method [22, 23]. In Olver [24] and Bluman and Kumei [25], we find a precise description about symmetry groups and Lie's theory. Symmetries help us to obtain invariable solutions of differential equations which have been reduced to other equations with fewer independent variables [26, 27]. By means of symmetry groups, we can obtain solutions of partial differential equations through other solutions.
This paper is ordered as follows: Firstly, we calculate local conservation laws of low order admitted by (1) by employing the multipliers theory, and we obtain a wide variety of low-order conservation laws for Equation (1). After that, we obtain the classical point symmetries admitted by Equation (1) in Section 3. By means of the point symmetries, we calculate symmetry reductions of the equation in the following section. In addition, we obtain other invariant solutions of the generalized equation, and we obtain the Lie symmetry groups. Finally, we present some concluding comments.
2 Conservation Laws
Conservations laws have been utilized to obtain solutions of partial differential equations and in the expansion of different numerical methods [28-30]. They are used in proving the existence and uniqueness of solutions. To evaluate conserved fluxes and densities, we study conservation laws for Equation (1), and we have used the invariance and multiplier perspective with the use of the Euler–Lagrange operator. Then, we have obtained conservation laws for Equation (1), namely, the following continuity equation:
(4)
in terms of the total derivative operators holding for the solutions of (1). The spatial flux is noted by
, and the conserved density is noted by
, depending of
and some derivatives of the function
. Also,
and
represent the total derivative functions with respect
and
, respectively.
A multiplier
is a function
that satisfies that, for solutions of Equation (1),
is a divergence expression. Every significant conservation law emerges from multipliers. If we move away of the group of solutions of Equation (1), all significant conservation laws (4) are equivalent to conservation laws with the following characteristic form:
(5)
where
varies from
by a banal conserved current.
We solve the following determining equation to find the set of multipliers:
(6)
where
represents the Euler–Lagrange factor
defined by
(7)
By considering (5-7), we derive the following local conservation laws for Equation (1):
Theorem 1.Under some arbitrary constants, the generalized Ostrovsky equation (1) admits the following local conservation laws of low order.
Case 1. In the case, with, we have the conservation law multiplier, and we get the following local conservation law:
(8)
Case 2.
In the case, we obtain local conservation laws under the following conservation law multipliers:
a.
, give us the following local conservation law:
(9)
b.
, with the conservation law:
(10)
c.
with the conservation law:
(11)
Case 3.
In the case, with, we obtain local conservation laws under the following conservation law multipliers:
a.
and the local conservation law:
(12)
b.
, with the conservation law:
(13)
c.
, in the case, with the conservation law:
(14)
d.
, in the case, which give us the following local conservation law:
(15)
Case 4. In the case, with, under the conservation law multiplier, with, we obtain the following local conservations law:
(16)
Case 5.
In the case, andwith, we obtain local conservation laws under the following conservation law multipliers:
a.
give us the following local conservation law:
(17)
b.
, with the conservation law:
(18)
c.
, with the conservation law:
(19)
Case 6. In the case, and, with, under the conservation law multiplier, we obtain one local conservation law:
(20)
Case 7. In the case, with, under the conservation law multiplier, with, we obtain the following local conservations law:
(21)
Case 8. In the case, and, under the conservation law multipliers, and, we obtain the following local conservations laws, respectively:
(22)
and the multiplierwith the local conservation laws:
(23)
Case 9.
In the case, we obtain extra local conservation laws under the following conservation law multipliers:
a.
, give us the following local conservation law:
(24)
b.
, with the conservation law:
(25)
c.
, with the conservation law:
(26)
d.
, with the conservation law:
(27)
e.
, with, give us the conservation law:
(28)
f.
, with the conservation law:
(29)
They are the absolute collection of local conservation laws accepted by Equation (1) under the constantsand
.
Proof.Equation (4) is satisfied when the generalized Ostrovsky equation (1) holds. The usual form of low-order multipliers of Equation (1) is represented by
The determining equation (6) gives us determining systems. We solve them and we obtain the previous solution multipliers given in each case, which provide us conserved fluxes and densities of Equation (1).
3 Point Symmetries of the Generalized Ostrovsky Equation
A Lie symmetry of determined partial differential equations is an operator that transforms solutions into other solutions. The mathematician, Sophus Lie, developed a theory in the 1870s to study the symmetries of partial differential equations, using what are now known as Lie groups. Now, we apply the classical Lie method to calculate symmetry reductions of the generalized Ostrovsky equation (1), and we consider the following one-parameter group:
(30)
where
is a small group parameter and
, and
represent the infinitesimals of symmetry transformations, corresponding to the dependent and independent variables, respectively, where
The operators
and
represent the total derivative functions with respect
and
, respectively, which are defined as
(31)
The generators associated to the Lie algebra are given by the generator
, represented by
(32)
where
If the generator (32) gives us a symmetry of (1), then
satisfies the symmetry condition
(33)
where
and
represents the fourth prolongation of (32)
(34)
where
, and
, for
and
.
Precisely, the fourth prolongation of the vector field
is given by
(35)
where
are expressed as a function of
and the derivatives of
. By using (33), we obtain the infinitesimals
, and
. From (33) and (35), the invariance condition reads as
(36)
where
(37)
and
and
are the total differential operators with respect to
and
, respectively, given by (31).
By using (33), we calculate the point symmetries of Equation (1). A point symmetry of Equation (1) is a one-parameter group of transformations depending on
with generator (32). The prolongation of the Lie group leaves invariant Equation (1). The vector field (32) yields a point symmetry of Equation (1) when it satisfies the Lie symmetry condition (33), which gives rise to the following linear system of determining differential equations for the infinitesimals
, the functions
, and the real parameters
and
:
(38)
Solving (38), we obtain some conditions for the functions and parameters, and we have the following theorem with the infinitesimal generators of the generalized Ostrovsky equation (1):
Theorem 2.The point symmetries of Equation (1) are defined by the following independent operators:
Case 1. In the caseandwith, the point symmetries of Equation (1) are defined by the generators
(39)
Case 2. In the caseand, with, the point symmetries of Equation (1) are defined by the generatorsand
.
Case 3. In the case, there are point symmetries of Equation (1) in the caseand, or in the case, and the generators are given by
(40)
Case 4. In the caseand, the point symmetries are given by
(41)
Case 5. In the general case forand, the point symmetries are given byand
.
We can easily check that the generators (39-41) are closed under the Lie bracket.
Now, we calculate the adjoint table for
and
, for
, given by the following expression:
By using the adjoint representation, we obtain conjugated subalgebras through equivalence classes, which represent every subalgebra of the Lie algebra. The optimal systems in each case are given, respectively, by
Now, we use (39-41) to determinate the symmetry groups
associated to the generator (32) and calculate new solutions for Equation (1) associated with them. To obtain the symmetry group, we use the following system of initial problems:
(42)
and
(43)
where
. From (42) and (43), we get the following theorem with the corresponding Lie symmetry group.
Theorem 3.The Lie symmetry groups, generated by, are specified by
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
whereis the parameter of the group.
Solutions of Equation (1) are transformed into solution through the use of symmetry groups. So, on the assumption that
is a solution of the generalized equation (1), we obtain new solutions for Equation (1) by means of diverse symmetry groups. Then, by using the previous groups
, we calculate the appropriate new solutions:
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
4 Symmetry Reductions and Exact Solutions
In this part, we use the optimal system computed in the anterior subsection, and we get the following symmetry reductions of Equation (1).
Case 1a.
In the case
and
with
, we use the generator
, and we get
(54)
where
. By considering (54) and (1), we have a reduced ordinary reduced equation given by
(55)
Case 1b.
In the case
and
with
, from the generator
, we have
(56)
where
. By the substitution of (56) into (1), we have an ordinary differential equation given by
(57)
We integrate with respect to
twice, multiply by
, and integrate again with respect to
for
. We consider zero the constants of integration, and we have the following ordinary differential equation:
(58)
with solution for
(59)
where
. This give us the following solution for Equation (1):
We have studied the generalized Ostrovsky equation (1) with real dispersion coefficients, from the point of view of symmetry analysis. First of all, we have derived conservation laws for the subjacent equation through multiplier approach conservation theorem, and we have recourse to the invariance and multiplier perspective by using the Euler–Lagrange operator. We have obtained several local conservation laws for Equation (1). Secondly, we have calculated Lie point symmetries of the equation, and subsequently, we have performed symmetry reductions. Also, we have obtained traveling wave solutions of significance importance by using the vector fields. Finally, we have obtained Lie symmetry groups generated by means of the vector field and new solutions for Equation (1) associated to them. The results obtained in this study contribute to the understanding of wave propagation in rotating fluids. The derivation of exact solutions and conservation laws allows for a better characterization of wave regimes, facilitating the development of more efficient and accurate numerical models. These solutions can serve as benchmark tests for computational simulations, helping to assess the accuracy of numerical schemes used in oceanic or atmospheric models. Furthermore, the identification of symmetries and conservation laws provides useful tools for simplifying complex equations and exploring new problem formulations in fluid dynamics.
Author Contributions
Sol Sáez: investigation; writing – original draft.
Acknowledgments
The support of University of Cádiz is gratefully acknowledged by the author.
2S. Levandosky and Y. Liu, “Stability of Solitary Waves of a Generalized Ostrovsky Equation,” SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis38, no. 3 (2006): 985–1011.
3S. C. Anco and M. L. Gandarias, “ Symmetries, Conservation Laws, and Generalized Travelling Waves for a Forced Ostrovsky Equation,” preprint, arXiv, December 23, 2021, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.06415.
4M. L. Gandarias and M. S. Bruzon, “Traveling Wave Solutions for a Generalized Ostrovsky Equation,” Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences41 (2018): 5840–5850.
5M. L. Gandarias and M. S. Bruzon, “Symmetry Analysis and Exact Solutions of Some Ostrovsky Equations,” Theoretical and Mathematical Physics168, no. 1 (2011): 898–911.
7X. Yan and W. Yan, “ The Cauchy Problem for the Generalized Ostrovsky Equation With Negative Dispersion,” preprint, arXiv, March 31, 2021, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.00549.
8Y. Liu and V. Varlamov, “Stability of Solitary Waves and Weak Rotation Limit for the Ostrovsky Equation,” Journal of Differential Equations203 (2004): 159–183.
11S. Srivastava and M. Kumar, “Nonclassical Symmetries, Optimal Classification, and Dynamical Behavior of Similarity Solutions of (3+1)-Dimensional Burgers Equation,” Chinese Journal of Physics89 (2024): 404–416.
12M. Kumar and R. Kumar, “On New Similarity Solutions of the Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli System,” Communications in Theoretical Physics61, no. 1 (2014): 121.
13M. Kumar and S. Srivastava, “Dynamics of the Breather and Solitary Waves in Plasma Using the Generalized Variable Coefficient Gardner Equation,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics101, no. 4 (2024): 465–482.
15J. W. Wilder, B. F. Edwards, D. A. Vasqez, and G. I. Sivashinsky, “Derivation of a Nonlinear Front Evolution Equation for Chemical Waves Involving Convection,” Physica D73 (1994): 217–226.
16X. Yang and E. Weinan, “Nonlinear Evolution Equation for the Stress-Driven Morphological Instability,” Journal of Applied Physics91 (2002): 9414–9422.
19N. A. Kudryashov, “Simplest Equation Method to Look for Exact Solutions of Nonlinear Differential Equation,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals24 (2005): 1217–1231.
20W. Malfliet, “The Tanh Method: A Tool for Solving Certain Classes of Nonlinear Evolution and Wave Equations,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics164–165 (2004): 529–541.
21X. Zhao, L. Wang, and W. Sun, “The Repeated Homogeneous Balance Method and Its Applications to Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals28 (2006): 448–453.
22A. Ouhadan and E.H. El Kinani, “ Lie Symmetries and Preliminary Classification of Group-Invariant Solutions of Thomas equation,” preprint, arXiv, April 1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math-ph/0412043.
23S. Sáez, “Symmetry Analysis of a Generalized 2D Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Burgers Equation With a Variable Dissipation,” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry58, no. 10 (2020): 2415–2424.
26M. Kumar and A. K. Tiwari, “On Group-Invariant Solutions of Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky Equation by Using Lie Symmetry Approach,” Nonlinear Dynamics94 (2018): 475–487.
27M. Kumar, S. Srivastava, and D. V. Tanwar, “Lie Symmetries, Soliton Dynamics, Conservation Laws and Stability Analysis of Bogoyavlensky–Konoplechenko System,” Optical and Quantum Electronics56 (2024): 1087.
29S. C. Anco and G. Bluman, “Direct Construction Method for Conservation Laws of Partial Differential Equations. I. Examples of Conservation Law Classifications,” European Journal of Applied Mathematics13 (2002): 545–566.
30S. C. Anco and G. Bluman, “Direct Construction Method for Conservation Laws of Partial Differential Equations. II. General Treatment,” European Journal of Applied Mathematics13 (2002): 567–585.
Please check your email for instructions on resetting your password.
If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered,
and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account.
Request Username
Can't sign in? Forgot your username?
Enter your email address below and we will send you your username
If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username
The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.