Volume 222, Issue 1 pp. 225-232
Article

Dynamics and Crystallization in Polydimethylsiloxane Nanocomposites

Alexandre Beigbeder

Alexandre Beigbeder

Laboratory of Polymers, Properties at Interfaces & Composites, South Brittany University, Rue de Saint-Maudé, 56 321 Lorient, France

Search for more papers by this author
Stéphane Bruzaud

Stéphane Bruzaud

Laboratory of Polymers, Properties at Interfaces & Composites, South Brittany University, Rue de Saint-Maudé, 56 321 Lorient, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jiri Spěváček

Jiri Spěváček

Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 16206 Prague 6, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
Jiri Brus

Jiri Brus

Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 16206 Prague 6, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
Yves Grohens

Yves Grohens

Laboratory of Polymers, Properties at Interfaces & Composites, South Brittany University, Rue de Saint-Maudé, 56 321 Lorient, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 April 2005
Citations: 4

Abstract

Several routes were used to achieve silicon nanocomposites. The first and second one are the melt intercalation of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), which is a mechanical blending of the polymer in the molten state with the untreated inorganic filler or intercalated nanoparticles. The last one is an in situ polymerization, which previously requires the intercalation of hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D3) followed by a subsequent polymerization step. We used synthetic mineral oxide HTiNbO5 as nanofiller. These systems were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and solid state NMR in order to better understand the relation between the nanocomposites dynamics, and crystallisation. The efficiency of grafting reactions was studied by 29Si CP/MAS NMR. The nature of the interfacial interactions seems to play the major role. Indeed, the nanocomposites 1 and 2 for which only physical interactions are expected do not exhibit any Tg deviation whereas the nanocomposite 3, for which chemical grafting is achieved, increases strongly the Tg. Crystallization is more sensitive to density and strength of interfacial interactions which are maximum for the pristine filler.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.