Volume 32, Issue 2 pp. 152-159

Dynamic behavior of cryogen spray cooling: Effects of spurt duration and spray distance

Guillermo Aguilar PhD

Corresponding Author

Guillermo Aguilar PhD

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92697

Beckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine, California 92612

Beckman Laser Institute, 1002 Health Sciences Road East, Irvine, CA 92612-1475.Search for more papers by this author
Guo-Xiang Wang PhD

Guo-Xiang Wang PhD

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Akron, Ohio 44325

Search for more papers by this author
J. Stuart Nelson MD, PhD

J. Stuart Nelson MD, PhD

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92697

Beckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine, California 92612

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 January 2003
Citations: 48

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Cryogen spray cooling (CSC) is used to minimize the risk of epidermal damage during laser dermatologic surgery. Since optimization of CSC permits the safe use of higher light doses, which improves therapeutic outcome in many patients with superficial skin lesions, studies have focused on understanding spray–surface interactions and cooling dynamics. The objective of this study is to measure accurately temperature variations at the sprayed surface and the effects of spurt duration (Δt) and nozzle-to-sprayed surface distance (L) on cooling dynamics during CSC.

Study Design/Materials and Methods

A fast-response temperature measurement sensor is built using thin (20 μm) aluminum foil placed on top of a poly methyl-methacrylate resin (Plexiglass®) with a 50 μm bead diameter thermocouple positioned in between. Liquid film residence time (tr) and minimum surface temperature (Tmin) are systematically measured as a function of Δt and L.

Results

Two distinct spray–surface interaction mechanisms are recognized. The transition between them occurs at a critical length Lc≈25–30 mm. Noticeable characteristics include: (1) for spurts at L < Lc, shorter tr, and lower Tmin are reached as compared to L > Lc, Tmin is dependent on Δt and L, while tr is a function of Δt only; (2) for spurts at L > Lc, Tmin still depends on L but not on Δt, while tr becomes a function of both Δt and L. Finally, for all Δt, tr reaches a maximum at L = 40 mm.

Conclusions

Based on our results, a good choice to achieve low Tmin and tr for the treatment of superficial skin lesions may be met by using Δt of ≈30–50 milliseconds and the shortest spray distance that is tolerable by the patient. Spurt durations (Δt) of more than 30–50 milliseconds at spray distances (L) greater than Lc lead to higher Tmin and longer tr. These parameters may be appropriate for laser therapy of deeper targets. Lasers Surg. Med. 32:152–159, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.