Volume 129, Issue 4 pp. 943-951
Laryngology

Nimodipine improves vocal fold and facial motion recovery after injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

R. Jun Lin MD, FRCSC, MSc

Corresponding Author

R. Jun Lin MD, FRCSC, MSc

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Send correspondence to R. Jun Lin, MD, FRCSC, MSc, Assistant Professor, University of Toronto, Associate Scientist, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Laryngology, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, 8-163 CC North, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 1W8. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Michele Klein-Fedyshin MSLS, BSN, RN, AHIP

Michele Klein-Fedyshin MSLS, BSN, RN, AHIP

Health Sciences Library System (HSLS), Research, Instruction, and Clinical Information Services Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Clark A. Rosen MD, FACS

Clark A. Rosen MD, FACS

UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 November 2018
Citations: 33

Presented as a podium presentation at the American Laryngological Association Annual Meeting at Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings (COSM), National Harbor, Maryland, U.S.A., April 19, 2018.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Introduction

Nimodipine is a calcium channel blocker that has been used to treat hypertension and vasospasm. Emerging evidence in the literature suggests that it is neuroprotective by reducing cellular apoptosis after neuronal injury and promoting axonal sprouting at the nodes of Ranvier.

Objectives

To conduct a systematic review of the usage of nimodipine in cranial nerve injury and to perform a meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy of nimodipine on functional recovery of the injured cranial nerves.

Methods

Literature search was performed in eight databases using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Human studies that used nimodipine as a monotherapy for treating cranial nerve injury were included for review. Cranial nerve function recovery was the primary outcome measure.

Results

672 records were screened and 58 full texts in English were assessed. Nine studies were included in the final review. 5 of these, including 110 participants who received nimodipine for either recurrent laryngeal nerve or facial nerve injury and 556 controls, were used for meta-analysis. Nimodipine significantly increased the odds of vocal fold motion recovery (odds ratio [OR] 13.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.21, 30.38, P < .01), and the odds of facial motion recovery (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.20, 6.44, P = .02). Overall, nimodipine-treated patients had significantly higher odds of recovering vocal fold or facial motion compared with controls (OR 6.09, 95% CI 3.41, 10.87, P < .01).

Conclusion

Existing evidence supports the positive effect of nimodipine on vocal fold and facial motion recovery after injury. Future research should focus on randomized clinical trials comparing recovery rates between nimodipine- and placebo-treated groups. Laryngoscope, 129:943–951, 2019

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.