Volume 41, Issue 3 pp. 210-212
Article
Full Access

Proximal colostomy: Still an effective emergency measure in obstructing carcinoma of the large bowel

Dr. Mordechai Gutman MD

Corresponding Author

Dr. Mordechai Gutman MD

Department of Surgery, Hadassah (Rokach) Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Department of Surgery, Hadassah (Rokach) Hospital, 8 Balfour St., P.O. Box 51, Tel Aviv, IsraelSearch for more papers by this author
Ofer Kaplan MD

Ofer Kaplan MD

Department of Surgery, Hadassah (Rokach) Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Yehuda Skornick MD

Yehuda Skornick MD

Department of Surgery, Hadassah (Rokach) Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Franklin Greif MD

Franklin Greif MD

Department of Surgery, Hadassah (Rokach) Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Perry Kahn MD

Perry Kahn MD

Department of Surgery, Hadassah (Rokach) Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
Ron R. Rozin Md, Facs

Ron R. Rozin Md, Facs

Department of Surgery, Hadassah (Rokach) Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
First published: July 1989
Citations: 14

Abstract

Large bowel obstruction constitutes an emergency abdominal condition and necessitates prompt surgical treatment. The optimal approach is still controversial as to whether to perform a diverting colostomy only or a tumor resection with or without primary anastomosis. Seventy-one elderly and high-risk patients were treated by proximal diverting colostomy through a right upper abdominal incision. The operative mortality was 8.5%, with an additional morbidity of 20.5%. Stomal complications appeared in 6.1% of the survivors. Seventy-five percent of surviving patients underwent successful resection and closure of colostomy within 3 months without additional mortality. Others were not operated because of metastatic disease or severe concomitant disease. We conclude that although primary resection should be attempted in good risk patients, for those patients who are elderly and at high risk, a simple life-saving procedure, such as fecal diversion, could alleviate obstructions with relatively low morbidity and mortality and improve the patient's prospects for subsequent definitive surgery.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.