Volume 131, Issue 2 pp. 115-123
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Proportion of Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ That Qualify for Observation Criteria Set Forth by Clinical Trials

Callie D. McAdams

Callie D. McAdams

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas Clevenger

Nicholas Clevenger

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kyra Nicholson

Kyra Nicholson

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Pesce

Catherine Pesce

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Katherine Kopkash

Katherine Kopkash

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth Poli

Elizabeth Poli

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas W. Smith

Thomas W. Smith

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Katherine Yao

Corresponding Author

Katherine Yao

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Correspondence: Katherine Yao ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 September 2024
Citations: 1

ABSTRACT

Background

The COMET, LORD, and LORIS clinical trials are investigating the role of active surveillance in low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The objective of this study was to identify the proportion of patients eligible for these trials amongst a cohort of patients treated at our institution.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was performed of patients diagnosed with DCIS who were treated from 2013 to 2022. Clinical, tumor, and imaging inclusion and exclusion criteria of the aforementioned observation trials were applied to determine the proportion of patients eligible for each trial. Upgrade rate to invasive cancer were examined across all three groups.

Results

Of 1223 patients diagnosed with DCIS, applying the criteria of each trial, 245 (20%), 238 (19.4%), and 264 (21.6%) patients were eligible for the COMET, LORD, and LORIS trials, respectively. High-grade DCIS and mass on imaging had the largest impact on exclusion. Nineteen (7.8%) of women who qualified for COMET were upgraded to invasive disease at excision, compared to 18 (7.6%) for LORD, and 19 (7.2%) for LORIS.

Conclusions

One in five patients diagnosed with DCIS at our institution would qualify for observation with current trial eligibility. Observation of DCIS may have limited impact on all DCIS patients.

Data Availability Statement

Our data policy statement is: data available upon request due to ethical/privacy reasons.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.