In Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Models—An Overview of Established Models and New Microfluidic Approaches
Corresponding Author
Anette Wolff
Lund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, Sweden
Telephone: +46-709948974; Fax: +46-46222 4527; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMaria Antfolk
Lund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorBirger Brodin
University of Copenhagen, Department of Pharmacy, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Tenje
Lund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, Sweden
Uppsala University, Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Anette Wolff
Lund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, Sweden
Telephone: +46-709948974; Fax: +46-46222 4527; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMaria Antfolk
Lund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorBirger Brodin
University of Copenhagen, Department of Pharmacy, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Tenje
Lund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, Sweden
Uppsala University, Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The societal need for new central nervous system (CNS) medicines is substantial, because of the global increase in life expectancy and the accompanying increase in age-related CNS diseases. Low blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability has been one of the major causes of failure for new CNS drug candidates. There has therefore been a great interest in cell models, which mimic BBB permeation properties. In this review, we present an overview of the performance of monocultured, cocultured, and triple-cultured primary cells and immortalized cell lines, including key parameters such as transendothelial electrical resistance values, permeabilities of paracellular flux markers, and expression of BBB-specific marker proteins. Microfluidic systems are gaining ground as a new automated technical platform for cell culture and systematic analysis. The performance of these systems was compared with current state-of-the-art models and it was noted that, although they show great promise, these systems have not yet reached beyond the proof-of-concept stage. In general, it was found that there were large variations in experimental protocols, BBB phenotype markers, and paracellular flux markers used. It is the author's opinion that the field may benefit greatly from developing standardized methodologies and initiating collaborative efforts on optimizing culture protocols. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 104:2727–2746, 2015
REFERENCES
- 1Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen H-U, Jönsson B. 2012. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol 19: 155–162.
- 2Wimo A, Jönsson L, Bond J, Prince M, Winblad B. 2013.
- 3Ehrlich P. 1885. Das Sauerstoff-Bedürfniss des Organismus – eine farbenanalytische Studie.
- 4Lewandowsky M. 1900. Zur lehre der cerebrospinalflussigkeit. Zeitschrift Klin Medizin 40: 480–494.
- 5Goldman EE. 1913. Vitalfärbung am zentralnervensystem:beitrag zur physio-pathologie des plexus chorioideus und der hirnhäute. Abhandlungen der Preuss. Akad. der Wissenschaften Philos Klasse 1.
- 6Reese TS, Karnovsky MJ. 1967. Fine structural localization of a blood–brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase. J Cell Biol 34: 207–217.
- 7Meyvantsson I, Beebe DJ. 2008. Cell culture models in microfluidic systems. Annu Rev Anal Chem 1: 423–449.
- 8Abbott N, Dolman D, Yusof S, Reichel A. 2014. In vitro models of CNS barriers. Drug Deliv Brain. 10: 163–197.
10.1007/978-1-4614-9105-7_6 Google Scholar
- 9Aschner M, Fitsanakis VA, Paula A, Olivi L, Bressler JP. 2006. Blood–brain barrier and cell–cell interactions methods for establishing in vitro models of the blood–brain barrier and transport measurements. Methods Mol Biol 341: 1–15.
- 10Cardoso FL, Brites D, Brito MA. 2010. Looking at the blood–brain barrier: Molecular anatomy and possible investigation approaches. Brain Res Rev 64: 328–363.
- 11Wilhelm I, Fazakas C, Krizbai IA. 2011. In vitro models of the blood-brain barrier. Acta Nerobiologiae Exp 71: 113–128.
- 12Bicker J, Alves G, Fortuna A, Falcão A. 2014. Blood–brain barrier models and their relevance for a successful development of CNS drug delivery systems: A review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 87: 409–432.
- 13Deli Ma, Ábrahám CS, Kataoka, Y, Niwa M. 2005. Permeability studies on in vitro blood–brain barrier models: Physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Cell Mol Neurobiol 25: 59–127.
- 14Abbott NJ, Patabendige AaK, Dolman DEM, Yusof SR, Begley DJ. 2010. Structure and function of the blood–brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis 37: 13–25.
- 15Hawkins B, Davis T. 2005. The blood–brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease. Pharmacol Rev 57: 173–185.
- 16de Boer AG, Gaillard PJ. 2006. Blood–brain barrier dysfunction and recovery. J Neural Transm 113: 455–462.
- 17Chaudhuri JD. 2000. Blood brain barrier and infection. Med Sci Monit 6: 1213–1222.
- 18Bagley RG, Weber W, Rouleau C, Teicher BA. 2005. Pericytes and endothelial precursor cells: Cellular interactions and contributions to malignancy. Cancer Res 65: 9741–9750.
- 19Scherrmann JM. 2002. Drug delivery to brain via the blood–brain barrier. Vascul Pharmacol 38: 349–354.
- 20Pardridge W. 1999. Blood–brain barrier biology and methodology. J Neurovirol 5: 556–569.
- 21Petty Ma, Lo EH. 2002. Junctional complexes of the blood–brain barrier: Permeability changes in neuroinflammation. Prog Neurobiol 68: 311–323.
- 22Schneeberger EE. 2003. Claudin extracellular domains determine paracellular charge selectively and resistance but not tight junction fibril architecture. Am J Physiol 284: 1331–1333.
- 23Balda M, Flores-Maldonado C, Cereijido M, Matter K. 2000. Multiple domains of occludin are involved in the regulation of paracellular permeability. J Cell Biochem 78: 85–96.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(20000701)78:1<85::AID-JCB8>3.0.CO;2-F CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 24Huber JD, Egleton RD, Davis TP. 2001. Molecular physiology and pathophysiology of tight junctions in the blood–brain barrier. Trends Neurosci 24: 719–725.
- 25Vorbrodt A, Dobrogowska D. 2003. Molecular anatomy of intercellular junctions in brain endothelial and epithelial barriers: Electron microscopist's view. Brain Res Rev 42: 221–242.
- 26Hurley R, Hayman A, Taber K. 2008. Astroglia: Not just glue. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 20: iv–129.
- 27Siddharthan V, Kim YV, Liu S, Kim KS. 2007. Human astrocytes/astrocyte-conditioned medium and shear stress enhance the barrier properties of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Brain Res 1147: 39–50.
- 28Colgan OC, et al. 2008. Influence of basolateral condition on the regulation of brain microvascular endothelial tight junction properties and barrier function. Brain Res 1193: 84–92.
- 29Zheng W, Aschner M, Ghersi-Egea JF. 2003. Brain barrier systems: A new frontier in metal neurotoxicological research. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 192: 1–11.
- 30Kim JA, et al. 2006. Brain endothelial hemostasis regulation by pericytes. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26: 209–217.
- 31Allt G, Lawrenson JG. 2001. Pericytes: Cell biology and pathology. Cells Tissues Organs 169: 1–11.
- 32Lai CH, Kuo KH. 2005. The critical component to establish in vitro BBB model: Pericyte. Brain Res Rev 50: 258–265.
- 33Armulik A. et al. 2010. Pericytes regulate the blood–brain barrier. Nature 468: 557–561.
- 34Thanabalasundaram G, Schneidewind J, Pieper C, Galla H-J. 2011. The impact of pericytes on the blood–brain barrier integrity depends critically on the pericyte differentiation stage. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 43: 1284–1293.
- 35Daneman R, Zhou L, Kebede Aa, Barres Ba. 2010. Pericytes are required for blood–brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature 468: 562–566.
- 36Dore-Duffy P, Katychev A, Wang X, VanBuren E. 2006. CNS microvascular pericytes exhibit multipotential stem cell activity. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26: 613–624.
- 37Minami M. 2011. Neuro–glio–vascular interaction in ischemic brains. Yakugaku zasshi 131: 539–544.
- 38Sumi N, et al. 2010. Lipopolysaccharide-activated microglia induce dysfunction of the blood–brain barrier in rat microvascular endothelial cells co-cultured with microglia. Cell Mol Neurobiol 30: 247–253.
- 39Perel P, et al. 2007. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: Systematic review. BMJ 334: 197.
- 40Crone C, Olesen SP. 1982. Electrical resistance of brain microvascular endothelium. Brain Res 241: 49–55.
- 41Smith QR, Rapoport SI. 1986. Cerebrovascular permeability coefficients to sodium, potassium, and chloride. J Neurochem 46: 1732–1742.
- 42Butt AM, Jones HC. 1992. Effect of histamine and antagonists on electrical resistance across the blood–brain barrier in rat brain-surface microvessels. Brain Res 569: 100–105.
- 43Reichel A, Begley DJ, Abbott NJ. 2003. An overview of in vitro techniques for blood–brain barrier studies. Methods Mol Med 89: 307–324.
- 44Haseloff RF, Dithmer S, Winkler L, Wolburg H, Blasig, IE. 2014. Transmembranal proteins of the tight junctions at the blood–brain barrier: Structural and functional aspects. Semin Cell Dev Biol.[Epub ahead of print]
- 45Ohno K, Pettigrew KD, Rapoport SI. 1978. Lower limits of cerebrovascular permeability to nonelectrolytes in the conscious rat. Am J Physiol 235: H299–H307.
- 46Brendel K, Meezan, E, Carlson E. 1974. Isolated brain microvessels: A purified, metabolically active preparation from bovine cerebral cortex. Science 185: 953–955.
- 47Zenker D, Begley D, Bratzke H, Rübsamen-Waigmann H, von Briesen H. 2003. Human blood-derived macrophages enhance barrier function of cultured primary bovine and human brain capillary endothelial cells. J Physiol 551: 1023–1032.
- 48Weidenfeller C, Svendsen CN, Shusta EV. 2007. Differentiating embryonic neural progenitor cells induce blood–brain barrier properties. J Neurochem 101: 555–565.
- 49Al Ahmad A, Gassmann M, Ogunshola OO. 2009. Maintaining blood–brain barrier integrity: Pericytes perform better than astrocytes during prolonged oxygen deprivation. J Cell Physiol 218: 612–622.
- 50Shayan G, Choi YS, Shusta EV, Shuler ML, Lee KH. 2011. Murine in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier for evaluating drug transport. Eur J Pharm Sci 42: 148–155.
- 51Freese C, et al. 2014. A novel blood–brain barrier co-culture system for drug targeting of Alzheimer's disease: Establishment by using acitretin as a model drug. PLoS One 9: e91003.
- 52Helms HC, et al. 2014. An electrically tight in vitro blood–brain barrier model displays net brain-to-blood efflux of substrates for the ABC transporters, P-gp, Bcrp and Mrp-1. AAPS J 16: 1046–1055.
- 53Omidi Y, et al. 2003. Evaluation of the immortalised mouse brain capillary endothelial cell line, b.End3, as an in vitro blood–brain barrier model for drug uptake and transport studies. Brain Res 990: 95–112.
- 54Brown R, Morris A, O'Neil R. 2007. Tight junction protein expression and barrier properties of immortalized mouse brain microvessel endothelial cells. Brain Res 1130: 17–30.
- 55Claudio L, Raine CS, Brosnan CF. 1995. Evidence of persistent blood–brain barrier abnormalities in chronic-progressive multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol 90: 228–238.
- 56Claudio L. 1995. Ultrastructural features of the blood–brain barrier in biopsy tissue from Alzheimer's disease patients. Acta Neuropathol 91: 6–14.
- 57Najjar S, Pearlman DM, Devinsky O, Najjar A, Zagzag D. 2013. Neurovascular unit dysfunction with blood–brain barrier hyperpermeability contributes to major depressive disorder: A review of clinical and experimental evidence. J Neuroinflammation 10: 142.
- 58Lippmann ES, Weidenfeller C, Svendsen CN, Shusta EV. 2011. Blood–brain barrier modeling with co-cultured neural progenitor cell-derived astrocytes and neurons. J Neurochem 119: 507–520.
- 59Lippmann ES, et al. 2012. Derivation of blood–brain barrier endothelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 30: 783–791.
- 60Lippmann ES, Al-Ahmad A, Azarin SM, Palecek SP, Shusta EV. 2014. A retinoic acid-enhanced, multicellular human blood–brain barrier model derived from stem cell sources. Sci Rep 4: 4160.
- 61Eigenmann D, et al. 2013. Comparative study of four immortalized human brain capillary endothelial cell lines, hCMEC/D3, hBMEC, TY10, and BB19, and optimization of culture. Fluids Barriers CNS 10: 33.
- 62Dehouck MP, Méresse S, Delorme P, Fruchart JC, Cecchelli R. 1990. An easier, reproducible, and mass-production method to study the blood–brain barrier in vitro. J Neurochem 54: 1798–1801.
- 63Zysk G, Schneider-Wald B. 2001. Pneumolysin is the main inducer of cytotoxicity to brain microvascular endothelial cells caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 69: 845–852.
- 64Kis B, et al. 2001. Adrenomedullin regulates blood–brain barrier functions in vitro. Neuroreport 12: 4139–4142.
- 65Deli Ma, Abrahám CS, Niwa M, Falus A. 2003. N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine increases the permeability of primary mouse cerebral endothelial cell monolayers. Inflamm Res 52Suppl 1: 39–40.
- 66Smith M, Omidi Y, Gumbleton M. 2007. Primary porcine brain microvascular endothelial cells: Biochemical and functional characterisation as a model for drug transport and targeting. J Drug Target 15: 253–268.
- 67Hutamekalin P, et al. 2008. Effect of nicotine and polyaromtic hydrocarbons on cerebral endothelial cells. Cell Biol Int 32: 198–209.
- 68Nakagawa S, et al. 2009. A new blood–brain barrier model using primary rat brain endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes. Neurochem Int 54: 253–263.
- 69Franke H, Galla HJ, Beuckmann CT. 1999. An improved low-permeability in vitro-model of the blood–brain barrier: Transport studies on retinoids, sucrose, haloperidol, caffeine and mannitol. Brain Res 818: 65–71.
- 70Bowman PD, Ennis SR, Rarey KE, Betz aL, Goldstein GW. 1983. Brain microvessel endothelial cells in tissue culture: A model for study of blood–brain barrier permeability. Ann Neurol 14: 396–402.
- 71Miller D, Audus K, Borchardt R. 1992. Application of cultured endothelial cells of the brain microvasculature in the study of the blood–brain barrier. J Tissue Cult Methods 14: 217–224.
10.1007/BF01409014 Google Scholar
- 72Jeliazkova-Mecheva VV, Bobilya DJ. 2003. A porcine astrocyte/endothelial cell co-culture model of the blood–brain barrier. Brain Res Protoc 12: 91–98.
- 73Bernas M, Cardoso F, Daley S. 2010. Establishment of primary cultures of human brain microvascular endothelial cells: A new and simplified method to obtain cells for an in vitro model of the blood. Nat Protoc 5: 1265–1272.
- 74Abbott NJ, Dolman DEM, Drndarski S, Fredriksson SM. 2012. An improved in vitro blood–brain barrier model: Rat brain endothelial cells co-cultured with astrocytes. Methods Mol Biol 814: 415–430.
- 75Navone SE, et al. 2013. Isolation and expansion of human and mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells. Nat Protoc 8: 1680–1693.
- 76Helms HC, Brodin B. 2014. Generation of primary cultures of bovine brain endothelial cells and setup of cocultures with rat astrocytes. Methods Mol Biol 1135: 365–382.
- 77Gumbleton M, Audus KL. 2001. Progress and limitations in the use of in vitro cell cultures to serve as a permeability screen for the blood–brain barrier. J Pharm Sci 90: 1681–1698.
- 78Hawkins R, O'Kane R, Simpson IA, Viña JR. 2006. Structure of the blood–brain barrier and its role in the transport of amino acids. J Nutr (1 Suppl): 218S–226S.
- 79Zhang Y, Li C, Ye Y, Johnson K. 2006. Porcine brain microvessel endothelial cells as an in vitro model to predict in vivo blood–brain barrier permeability. Drug Metab Dispos 34: 1935–1943.
- 80Patabendige A, Skinner RA, Abbott NJ. 2013. Establishment of a simplified in vitro porcine blood–brain barrier model with high transendothelial electrical resistance. Brain Res 1521: 1–15.
- 81Hartmann C, Zozulya A, Wegener J, Galla H-J. 2007. The impact of glia-derived extracellular matrices on the barrier function of cerebral endothelial cells: An in vitro study. Exp Cell Res 313: 1318–1325.
- 82Patabendige A, Skinner RA, Abbott NJ. 2013. Establishment of a simplified in vitro porcine blood–brain barrier model with high transendothelial electrical resistance. Brain Res 1521: 1–15.
- 83Griep LM, et al. 2013. BBB ON CHIP: Microfluidic platform to mechanically and biochemically modulate blood–brain barrier function. Biomed Microdevices 15: 145–150.
- 84Cucullo L, et al. 2008. Immortalized human brain endothelial cells and flow-based vascular modeling: A marriage of convenience for rational neurovascular studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28: 312–328.
- 85Prabhakarpandian B, et al. 2013. SyM-BBB: A microfluidic blood brain barrier model. Lab Chip 13: 1093.
- 86Takeshita Y, et al. 2014. An in vitro blood–brain barrier model combining shear stress and endothelial cell/astrocyte co-culture. J Neurosci 30: 165–172.
- 87Gaillard PJ, et al. 2001. Establishment and functional characterization of an in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier, comprising a co-culture of brain capillary endothelial cells and astrocytes. Eur J Pharm Sci 12: 215–222.
- 88Rubin LL, et al. 1991. A cell culture model of the blood–brain barrier. J Cell Biol 115: 1725–1735.
- 89deBoer A, Sutanto W, Pardridge WM. 1998. Drug transport across the blood–brain barrier: In vitro and in vivo techniques. Drug Deliv 5: 153–153.
10.3109/10717549809031391 Google Scholar
- 90Schaddelee MP, et al. 2003. Functional role of adenosine receptor subtypes in the regulation of blood–brain barrier permeability: Possible implications for the design of synthetic adenosine derivatives. Eur J Pharm Sci 19: 13–22.
- 91Helms HC, Waagepetersen HS, Nielsen CU, Brodin, B. 2010. Paracellular tightness and claudin-5 expression is increased in the BCEC/astrocyte blood–brain barrier model by increasing media buffer capacity during growth. AAPS J 12: 759–770.
- 92Cestelli A, et al. 2001. Functional feature of a novel model of blood brain barrier: Studies on permeation of test compounds. J Control Release 76: 139–147.
- 93Raub TJ, Kuentzel SL, Sawada Ga. 1992. Permeability of bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells in vitro: Barrier tightening by a factor released from astroglioma cells. Exp Cell Res 199: 330–340.
- 94Giese H, Mertsch K, Blasig I. 1995. Effect of MK-801 and U83836E on a porcine brain capillary endothelial cell barrier during hypoxia. Neurosci Lett 191: 169–172.
- 95Schirmacher A, Winters S. 2000. Electromagnetic fields (1.8 GHz) increase the permeability to sucrose of the blood–brain barrier in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 21: 338–345.
- 96Cantrill CA, Skinner RA, Rothwell NJ, Penny JI. 2012. An immortalised astrocyte cell line maintains the in vivo phenotype of a primary porcine in vitro blood–brain barrier model. Brain Res 1479: 17–30.
- 97Kasa P, Pakaski M, Joó F, Lajtha A. 1991. Endothelial cells from human fetal brain microvessels may be cholinoceptive, but do not synthesize acetylcholine. J Neurochem 56: 2143–2146.
- 98Megard I, et al. 2002. A co-culture-based model of human blood–brain barrier: Application to active transport of indinavir and in vivo–in vitro correlation. Brain Res 927: 153–167.
- 99Cucullo L, Marchi N, Hossain M, Janigro D. 2011. A dynamic in vitro BBB model for the study of immune cell trafficking into the central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31: 767–777.
- 100Cucullo L, Hossain M, Puvenna V, Marchi N, Janigro D. 2011. The role of shear stress in blood–brain barrier endothelial physiology. BMC Neurosci 12: 40.
- 101Tan K, Dobbie M, Felix R. 2001. A comparison of the induction of immortalized endothelial cell impermeability by astrocytes. Neurochemistry 12: 1329–1334.
- 102Hatherell K, Couraud PO, Romero IA, Weksler B, Pilkington GJ. 2011. Development of a three-dimensional, all-human in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier using mono-, co-, and tri-cultivation Transwell models. J Neurosci Methods 199: 223–229.
- 103Li G, et al. 2010. Permeability of endothelial and astrocyte cocultures: In vitro blood–brain barrier models for drug delivery studies. Ann Biomed Eng 38: 2499–2511.
- 104Booth R, Kim H. 2012. Characterization of a microfluidic in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier (μBBB). Lab Chip 12: 1784–1792.
- 105Booth RH, Kim H. 2012. A parallel array microfluidic blood–brain barrier model for high-throughput quantitaion of shear stress effects. In 16th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, 491–493.
- 106Stanness KA, et al. 1999. A new model of the blood–brain barrier: Co-culture of neuronal, endothelial and glial cells under dynamic conditions. Neuroreport 10: 3725–3731.
- 107Blasig IE, Mertsch K, Haseloff RF. 2002. Nitronyl nitroxides, a novel group of protective agents against oxidative stress in endothelial cells forming the blood–brain barrier. Neuropharmacology 43: 1006–1014.
- 108Demeuse P, et al. 2002. Compartmentalized coculture of rat brain endothelial cells and astrocytes: A syngenic model to study the blood–brain barrier. J Neurosci Methods 121: 21–31.
- 109Krizanac-Bengez L, et al. 2003. Effects of transient loss of shear stress on blood–brain barrier endothelium: Role of nitric oxide and IL-6. Brain Res 977: 239–246.
- 110Krizanac-Bengez L, et al. 2006. Loss of shear stress induces leukocyte-mediated cytokine release and blood–brain barrier failure in dynamic in vitro blood–brain barrier model. J Cell Physiol 206: 68–77.
- 111Nakagawa S, et al. 2007. Pericytes from brain microvessels strengthen the barrier integrity in primary cultures of rat brain endothelial cells. Cell Mol Neurobiol 27: 687–694.
- 112Cecchelli R, et al. 2014. A stable and reproducible human blood–brain barrier model derived from hematopoietic stem cells. PLoS One 9: e99733.
- 113Hayashi K, et al. 2004. Effects of hypoxia on endothelial/pericytic co-culture model of the blood–brain barrier. Regul Pept 123: 77–83.
- 114Hamm S, et al. 2004. Astrocyte mediated modulation of blood–brain barrier permeability does not correlate with a loss of tight junction proteins from the cellular contacts. Cell Tissue Res 315: 157–166.
- 115Garberg P, et al. 2005. In vitro models for the blood–brain barrier. Toxicol Vitr 19: 299–334.
- 116Stanness K, et al. 1997. Morphological and functional characterization of an in vitro blood–brain barrier model. Brain Res 771: 329–342.
- 117Abbruscato TJ, Davis TP. 1999. Combination of hypoxia/aglycemia compromises in vitro blood–brain barrier integrity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289: 668–675.
- 118Cucullo L, et al. 2002. A new dynamic in vitro model for the multidimensional study of astrocyte-endothelial cell interactions at the blood–brain barrier. Brain Res 951: 243–254.
- 119Santaguida S, et al. 2006. Side by side comparison between dynamic versus static models of blood–brain barrier in vitro: A permeability study. Brain Res 1109: 1–13.
- 120Boveri M, et al. 2005. Induction of blood–brain barrier properties in cultured brain capillary endothelial cells: Comparison between primary glial cells and C6 cell line. Glia 51: 187–198.
- 121Weidenfeller C, Svendsen CN, Shusta EV. 2007. Differentiation embryonic nerual progenitor cells induce blood–brain barrier properties. J Neurochem 101: 555–565.
- 122Balbuena P, Li W, Magnin-Bissel G, Meldrum JB, Ehrich M. 2010. Comparison of two blood–brain barrier in vitro systems: Cytotoxicity and transfer assessments of malathion/oxon and lead acetate. Toxicol Sci 114: 260–271.
- 123Xue Q, et al. 2013. A novel brain neurovascular unit model with neurons, astrocytes and microvascular endothelial cells of rat. Int J Biol Sci 9: 174–189.
- 124DeBault LE, Cancilla PA. 1980. gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase in isolated brain endothelial cells: Induction by glial cells in vitro. Science 207: 653–655.
- 125Vastag M, Keseru GM. 2009. Current in vitro and in silico models of blood–brain barrier penetration: A practical view. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 12: 115–124.
- 126Zonta M, et al. 2003. Neuron-to-astrocyte signaling is central to the dynamic control of brain microcirculation. Nat Neurosci 6: 43–50.
- 127Harris SG, Shuler ML. 2003. Growth of endothelial cells on microfabricated silicon nitride membranes for an in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 8: 246–251.
- 128Stanness K, Guatteo E, Janigro D. 1996. “A dynamic model of the blood–brain barrier “ in vitro”. Neurotoxicology 17: 481–496.
- 129Naik P, Cucullo L. 2012. In vitro blood–brain barrier models: Current and perspective technologies. J Pharm Sci 101: 1337–1354.
- 130Dohgu S, et al. 2005. Brain pericytes contribute to the induction and up-regulation of blood–brain barrier functions through transforming growth factor-beta production. Brain Res 1038: 208–215.
- 131Janzer RC, Raff MC. 1987. Astrocytes induce blood–brain barrier properties in endothelial cells. Nature 325: 253–257.
- 132Schiera G, Sala S, Gallo A. 2005. Permeability properties of a three-cell type in vitro model of blood–brain barrier. J Cell Mol Med 9: 373–379.
- 133Savettieri G, et al. 2000. Neurons and ECM regulate occludin localization in brain endothelial cells. Mol Neurosci 11: 1081–1084.
- 134Schiera G, et al. 2003. Synergistic effects of neurons and astrocytes on the differentiation of brain capillary endothelial cells in culture. J Cell Mol Med 7: 165–170.
- 135Zlokovic BV. 2008. The blood–brain barrier in health and chronic neurodegenerative disorders. Neuron 57: 178–201.
- 136Gaillard PJ, de Boer AG. 2000. Relationship between permeability status of the blood–brain barrier and in vitro permeability coefficient of a drug. Eur J Pharm Sci 12: 95–102.
- 137Perrière N, et al. 2007. A functional in vitro model of rat blood–brain barrier for molecular analysis of efflux transporters. Brain Res 1150: 1–13.
- 138Griep LM, et al. 2012. BBB on chip: Microfluidic platform to mechanically and biochemically modulate blood–brain barrier function. Biomed Microdevices 15: 145–150.
- 139Neuhaus W, et al. 2006. A novel flow based hollow-fiber blood–brain barrier in vitro model with immortalised cell line PBMEC/C1–2. J Biotechnol 125: 127–141.
- 140Duvernoy H, Delon S, Vannson J. 1983. The vascularization of the human cerebellar cortex. Brain Res Bull 11: 419–480.
- 141Nicholson C. 2001. Diffusion and related transport mechanisms in brain tissue. Reports Prog Phys 64: 815–884.
- 142Schlageter KE, Molnar P, Lapin GD, Groothuis DR. 1999. Microvessel organization and structure in experimental brain tumors: Microvessel populations with distinctive structural and functional properties. Microvasc Res 58: 312–328.