Volume 174, Issue 3 pp. 359-372
Regular Article
Full Access

Applicability of the soil gradient method for estimating soil–atmosphere CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes for steppe soils in Inner Mongolia

Benjamin Wolf

Benjamin Wolf

Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Weiwei Chen

Weiwei Chen

State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IAP-CAS), 100029 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Nicolas Brüggemann

Nicolas Brüggemann

Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Xunhua Zheng

Xunhua Zheng

State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IAP-CAS), 100029 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jukka Pumpanen

Jukka Pumpanen

Department of Forest Ecology, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl

Corresponding Author

Klaus Butterbach-Bahl

Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany

Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstraße 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, GermanySearch for more papers by this author
First published: 07 December 2010
Citations: 40

Abstract

For evaluating the applicability of the soil gradient method as a substitute for CO2-, CH4-, and N2O-flux measurements in steppe, we carried out chamber measurements and determined soil gas concentration at an ungrazed (UG99) and a grazed (WG) site in Inner Mongolia, China. The agreement of the concentration-based flux estimates with measured chamber-based fluxes varied largely depending on the respective GHG in the sequence CO2 > CH4 >> N2O. A calibration of the gas-transport parameter used to calculate fluxes based on soil gas concentrations improved the results considerably for CO2 and CH4. After calibration, the average deviation from the chamber-based annual cumulative flux for both sites was 11.5%, 10.5%, and 59% for CO2, CH4, and N2O. The gradient method did not constitute an adequate stand-alone substitute for greenhouse-gas flux estimation since a calibration using chamber-based measurements was necessary and vigorous production processes were confined to the uppermost, almost water-saturated soil layer.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.