Population-based type-specific prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in middle-aged Swedish Women
Corresponding Author
Ola Forslund
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Department of Medical Microbiology, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden.===Search for more papers by this authorAnnika Antonsson
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorKarin Edlund
Department of Virology, University of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAdrian J.C. van den Brule
Department of Pathology, Section of Molecular Pathology, Vrije Universeit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorBengt-Göran Hansson
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorChris. J.L.M. Meijer
Department of Pathology, Section of Molecular Pathology, Vrije Universeit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorWalter Ryd
Department of Dermato-Venereology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorEva Rylander
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAnders Strand
Department of Medicine, Dermatology, and Venereology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorGöran Wadell
Department of Virology, University of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorJoakim Dillner
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorBo Johansson
Division of Clinical Virology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ola Forslund
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Department of Medical Microbiology, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden.===Search for more papers by this authorAnnika Antonsson
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorKarin Edlund
Department of Virology, University of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAdrian J.C. van den Brule
Department of Pathology, Section of Molecular Pathology, Vrije Universeit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorBengt-Göran Hansson
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorChris. J.L.M. Meijer
Department of Pathology, Section of Molecular Pathology, Vrije Universeit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorWalter Ryd
Department of Dermato-Venereology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorEva Rylander
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAnders Strand
Department of Medicine, Dermatology, and Venereology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorGöran Wadell
Department of Virology, University of Northern Sweden, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorJoakim Dillner
Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorBo Johansson
Division of Clinical Virology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing can be used to identify women at risk of the development of cervical cancer. The cost-effectiveness of HPV screening is dependent on the type-specific HPV prevalence in the general population. The present study describes the prevalence and spectrum of high-risk HPV types found in a large real-life population-based HPV screening trial undertaken entirely within the cervical screening program offered to middle-aged Swedish women. Cervical brush samples from 6,123 women aged 32–38 years were analyzed using a general HPV primer (GP5+/6+) polymerase chain reaction-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) combined with reverse dot-blot hybridization for confirmation and HPV typing by a single assay. In this study, 6.8% (95% CI 6.2–7.5) (417/6,123) were confirmed as high-risk HPV positive. Infections with 13 different high-risk HPV types were detected, of which HPV 16 was the most prevalent type (2.1%; 128/6,123), followed by HPV 31 (1.1%; 67/6,123). Any one of the HPV types 18, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, or 66 was detected in 3.6% (223/6,123) of the women. Infection with two, three, and five types simultaneously was identified in 32, 5, and 1 women, respectively. The combination of PCR-EIA as a screening test and reverse dot-blot hybridization as a confirmatory test, was found to be readily applicable to a real-life population-based cervical screening. The type-specific HPV prevalence found support in previous modeling studies suggesting that HPV screening may be a favorable cervical screening strategy. J. Med. Virol. 66:535–541, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- Boyes DA, Morrison B, Knox EG, Draper GJ, Miller AB. 1982. A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia. Clin Invest Med 5: 1–29.
- Chamberlain J. 1986. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer. In: M Hakama, A Miller, N Day, editors. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. Vol. 76. Lyons, France: IARC. p 161–168.
- Coutlee F, Gravitt P, Richardson H, Hankins C, Franco E, Lapointe N, Voyer H. 1999. Nonisotopic detection and typing of human papillomavirus DNA in genital samples by the line blot assay. The Canadian Women's HIV Study Group. J Clin Microbiol 37: 1852–1857.
-
Cuzick J,
Sasieni P,
Davies P,
Adams J,
Normand C,
Frater A,
van Ballegooijen M,
van Den Akker E.
1999.
A systematic review of the role of human papillomavirus testing within a cervical screening programme.
Health Technol Assess
3:
1–204.
10.3310/hta3140 Google Scholar
- de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, Hopman E, Bleker OP, Helmerhorst TM, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, Meijer CJ. 1995a. HPV prevalence in cytomorphologically normal cervical scrapes of pregnant women as determined by PCR: the age–related pattern. J Med Virol 46: 97–102.
- de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, van den Brule AJ, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ. 1995b. The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3′ ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCR. J Gen Virol 76: 1057–1062.
- de Villiers EM, Wagner D, Schneider A, Wesch H, Munz F, Miklaw H, zur Hausen H. 1992. Human papillomavirus DNA in women without and with cytological abnormalities: results of a 5-year follow-up study. Gynecol Oncol 44: 33–39.
- Evander M, Edlund K, Gustafsson A, Jonsson M, Karlsson R, Rylander E, Wadell G. 1995. Human papillomavirus infection is transient in young women: a population-based cohort study. J Infect Dis 171: 1026–2030.
- Falcone T, Ferenczy A. 1986. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and condyloma: an analysis of diagnostic accuracy of posttreatment follow-up methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154: 260–264.
- Forslund O, Hansson BG, Bjerre B. 1994. Typing of human papillomaviruses by consensus polymerase chain reaction and a non-radioactive reverse dot blot hybridization. J Virol Methods 49: 129–139.
- Hansson BG, Forslund O, Bjerre B, Lindholm K, Nordenfelt E. 1993. Human papilloma virus types in routine cytological screening and at colposcopic examinations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 52: 49–55.
- Hildesheim A, Schiffman MH, Gravitt PE, Glass AG, Greer CE, Zhang T, Scott DR, Rush BB, Lawler P, Sherman ME, et al. 1994. Persistence of type-specific human papillomavirus infection among cytologically normal women. J Infect Dis 169: 235–240.
- Ho GY, Bierman R, Beardsley L, Chang CJ, Burk RD. 1998. Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med 338: 423–428.
- Ho GY, Burk RD, Klein S, Kadish AS, Chang CJ, Palan P, Basu J, Tachezy R, Lewis R, Romney S. 1995. Persistent genital human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for persistent cervical dysplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 1365–1371.
- Jacobs MV, Snijders PJ, van den Brule AJ, Helmerhorst TJ, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM. 1997. A general primer GP5+/GP6+-mediated PCR-enzyme immunoassay method for rapid detection of 14 high-risk and 6 low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapings. J Clin Microbiol 35: 791–795.
- Jacobs MV, Snijders PJ, Voorhorst FJ, Dillner J, Forslund O, Johansson B, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Meijer CJ, Meyer T, Nindl I, Pfister H, Stockfleth E, Strand A, Wadell G, Walboomers JM. 1999. Reliable high risk HPV DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction: an intermethod and intramethod comparison. J Clin Pathol 52: 498–503.
- Jacobs MV, Walboomers JM, Snijders PJ, Voorhorst FJ, Verheijen RH, Fransen-Daalmeijer N, Meijer CJ. 2000. Distribution of 37 mucosotropic HPV types in women with cytologically normal cervical smears: the age-related patterns for high-risk and low-risk types. Int J Cancer 87: 221–227.
- Läärä E, Day NE, Hakama M. 1987. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes. Lancet 1: 1247–1249.
- Liaw KL, Glass AG, Manos MM, Greer CE, Scott DR, Sherman M, Burk RD, Kurman RJ, Wacholder S, Rush BB, Cadell DM, Lawler P, Tabor D, Schiffman M. 1999. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cytologically normal women and subsequent cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 954–960.
- Lörincz AT, Reid R, Jenson AB, Greenberg MD, Lancaster W, Kurman RJ. 1992. Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix: relative risk associations of 15 common anogenital types. Obstet Gynecol 79: 328–337.
- Melkert PW, Hopman E, van den Brule AJ, Risse EK, van Diest PJ, Bleker OP, Helmerhorst T, Schipper ME, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM. 1993. Prevalence of HPV in cytomorphologically normal cervical smears, as determined by the polymerase chain reaction, is age-dependent. Int J Cancer 53: 919–923.
- Mählck CG, Jonsson H, Lenner P. 1994. Pap smear screening and changes in cervical cancer mortality in Sweden. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 44: 267–272.
- Nindl I, Lotz B, Kuhne-Heid R, Endisch U, Schneider A. 1999. Distribution of 14 high risk HPV types in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia detected by a non-radioactive general primer PCR mediated enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Pathol 52: 17–22.
- Nobbenhuis MA, Walboomers JM, Helmerhorst TJ, Rozendaal L, Remmink AJ, Risse EK, van der Linden HC, Voorhorst FJ, Kenemans P, Meijer CJ. 1999. Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study. Lancet 354: 20–25.
- Pontén J, Adami HO, Bergstrom R, Dillner J, Friberg LG, Gustafsson L, Miller AB, Parkin DM, Sparen P, Trichopoulos D. 1995. Strategies for global control of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 60: 1–26.
- Qu W, Jiang G, Cruz Y, Chang CJ, Ho GY, Klein RS, Burk RD. 1997. PCR detection of human papillomavirus: comparison between MY09/MY11 and GP5+/GP6+ primer systems. J Clin Microbiol 35: 1304–1310.
- Ratnam S, Franco EL, Ferenczy A. 2000. Human papillomavirus testing for primary screening of cervical cancer precursors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9: 945–951.
- Remmink AJ, Walboomers JM, Helmerhorst TJ, Voorhorst FJ, Rozendaal L, Risse EK, Meijer CJ, Kenemans P. 1995. The presence of persistent high-risk HPV genotypes in dysplastic cervical lesions is associated with progressive disease: natural history up to 36 months. Int J Cancer 61: 306–311.
- Rozendaal L, Westerga J, van der Linden JC, Walboomers JM, Voorhorst FJ, Risse EK, Boon ME, Meijer CJ. 2000. PCR based high risk HPV testing is superior to neural network based screening for predicting incident CIN III in women with normal cytology and borderline changes. J Clin Pathol 53: 606–611.
-
Schiffman MH,
Brinton LA.
1995.
The epidemiology of cervical carcinogenesis.
Cancer
76:
1888–1901.
10.1002/1097-0142(19951115)76:10+<1888::AID-CNCR2820761305>3.0.CO;2-H CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
-
Schoell WM,
Janicek MF,
Mirhashemi R.
1999.
Epidemiology and biology of cervical cancer.
Semin Surg Oncol
16:
203–211.
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199904/05)16:3<203::AID-SSU2>3.0.CO;2-C CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- van Ballegooijen M, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Warmerdam PG, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM, Habbema JD. 1997. Present evidence on the value of HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: a model-based exploration of the (cost-) effectiveness. Br J Cancer 76: 651–657.
- Van den Brule AJC, Pol R, Fransen-Daalmeijer N, Schouls LM, Meijer CJLM, Snijders PJF. 2002. GP5+/6+PCR followed by reverse line blot analysis enables rapid and high throughout identification of HPV genotypes, suitable for mass screening. J Clin Microbiol, in press.
-
Walboomers JM,
Jacobs MV,
Manos MM,
Bosch FX,
Kummer JA,
Shah KV,
Snijders PJ,
Peto J,
Meijer CJ,
Muñoz N.
1999.
Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide.
J Pathol
189:
12–19.
10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Yobs AR, Swanson RA, Lamotte LC Jr. 1985. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol 65: 235–244.
- zur Hausen H. 1996. Papillomavirus infections—a major cause of human cancers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1288: F55–78.