Volume 39, Issue 6 pp. 1543-1549
Original Research

Automated identification of brain new lesions in multiple sclerosis using subtraction images

Marco Battaglini PhD

Marco Battaglini PhD

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Francesca Rossi MD

Francesca Rossi MD

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Richard A. Grove PhD

Richard A. Grove PhD

Neurosciences Clinical Statistics GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Laura Stromillo MD

Maria Laura Stromillo MD

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Brandon Whitcher PhD

Brandon Whitcher PhD

Mango Solutions, Chippenham, UK

Imperial College, Statistics Group, Department of Mathematics, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Paul M. Matthews MD

Paul M. Matthews MD

Imperial College, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, London, UK

Clinical Imaging Centre GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Nicola De Stefano MD

Corresponding Author

Nicola De Stefano MD

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Address reprint requests to: N.D.S., Department of Neurological, Neurosurgery and Behavioural Sciences, Viale Bracci 2, 53100 Siena, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 October 2013
Citations: 42

Abstract

Purpose

To propose and evaluate a new automated method for the identification of new/enlarging multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on subtracted images (SI). The subtraction of serially acquired images has shown great potential in assessing new/enlarging brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions in MS patients. However, this approach relies on the manual definition of lesions, which is labor-intensive and subject to operator-dependent variability.

Materials and Methods

An overestimated mask of candidate SI lesions was created and then these hyperintense voxel clusters were filtered using specific constraints for extent, shape, and intensity. The method was tested on normal and pathological MRI datasets.

Results

The automated method did not detect hyperintense voxels on SI of healthy controls. SI lesions were identified manually and automatically in a multicenter MS dataset of 19 patients with paired MRI over 36 weeks. Sensitivity of the method was high (0.91) and in agreement with the results of manually defined SI lesions (Cohen's k = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–0.87). On a second multicenter MS dataset of 103 patients with paired MRI over 76 weeks, the number of SI lesions detected automatically correlated with the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions (r = 0.74).

Conclusion

The proposed method is robust, accurate, and sensitive and may be used with confidence in Phase II MS trials. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1543–1549. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.