Volume 36, Issue 5 pp. 1222-1230
Original Research

MR proton spectroscopy for myocardial lipid deposition quantification: A quantitative comparison between 1.5T and 3T

Bharath Ambale Venkatesh PhD

Bharath Ambale Venkatesh PhD

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joao A.C. Lima MD

Joao A.C. Lima MD

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Bluemke MD, PhD

David A. Bluemke MD, PhD

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Shenghan Lai MD, MPH

Shenghan Lai MD, MPH

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Charles Steenbergen MD, PhD

Charles Steenbergen MD, PhD

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Chia-Ying Liu PhD

Corresponding Author

Chia-Ying Liu PhD

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

MRI Room 110, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2012
Citations: 20

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate 3T magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-derived myocardial fat-signal fractions in comparison with those from 1.5T MRS.

Materials and Methods:

We conducted phantom, ex vivo and in vivo myocardial specimen evaluations at both 1.5T and 3T using 1H-MRS. A phantom with nine fat-water emulsions was constructed to assess the accuracy of the spectroscopy measurements. Ex vivo spectroscopy data were acquired in 70 segments from 21 autopsy heart slices. In vivo spectroscopy data were acquired in the interventricular septum from 22 human volunteers.

Results:

Phantom experiments demonstrated that 1.5T and 3T measurements were highly correlated with the reference values (r = 0.78, P < 0.05). The ex vivo and in vivo experiments demonstrated an increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 45 ± 73% and 76 ± 72% at 3T compared to 1.5T (P < 0.05). The mean fat-signal fraction was similar at 3T and 1.5T (1.11 ± 1.18 vs. 1.00 ± 1.09, respectively, P = NS) in ex vivo studies but were significantly different in the in vivo studies (2.47 ± 1.46 vs. 1.56 ± 1.34, P < 0.05). The fat-signal fractions from 3T and 1.5T correlated fairly well in all experiments.

Conclusion:

3T MRS has significantly greater SNR and could potentially be more accurate as compared to 1.5T for quantification of myocardial fat fraction in in vivo studies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:1222–1230. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.