Volume 35, Issue 4 pp. 969-975
Technical Note

Cross-sectional and In-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion prepulse and spiral read-out: A comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla

Sarah A. Peel MS

Corresponding Author

Sarah A. Peel MS

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Rayne's Institute, Division of Imaging Sciences, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, UKSearch for more papers by this author
Tarique Hussain MD

Tarique Hussain MD

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Tobias Schaeffter PhD

Tobias Schaeffter PhD

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Gerald F. Greil MD

Gerald F. Greil MD

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Miriam W. Lagemaat MS

Miriam W. Lagemaat MS

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Rene M. Botnar PhD

Rene M. Botnar PhD

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 December 2011
Citations: 4

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare cross-sectional and in-plane coronary vessel wall imaging using a spiral readout at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T).

Materials and Methods:

Free-breathing coronary vessel wall imaging using a local inversion technique and spiral readout was implemented. Images were acquired in ten healthy adult subjects on a 3T clinical scanner using a 32-element cardiac coil and repeated on a 1.5T clinical scanner using a 5-element coil.

Results:

Cross-sectional and in-plane spiral vessel wall imaging was performed at both 1.5 and 3T. In cross-sectional images, artifact scores were superior at 1.5T (P < 0.05) but no significant difference was found in image quality scores compared with 3T. Image quality (P < 0.01) and artifact scores (P < 0.01) were found to be superior for in-plane images at 1.5T. Vessel wall sharpness in the in-plane orientation was also found to be higher at 1.5T (P < 0.03).

Conclusion:

Although excellent in-plane coronary vessel wall images can be acquired at 3T, the overall robustness may be affected by off-resonance blurring due to increased B0 inhomogeneity compared with 1.5T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:969–975. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.