Volume 25, Issue 1 pp. 160-169
Original Research

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI study of male pelvic perfusion at 3T: Preliminary clinical report

Ping Hou PhD

Corresponding Author

Ping Hou PhD

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 2.100, Houston, TX 77030Search for more papers by this author
Elise J.B. De MD

Elise J.B. De MD

Department of Urology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Larry A. Kramer MD

Larry A. Kramer MD

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
O. Lenaine Westney MD

O. Lenaine Westney MD

Urology Division, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 December 2006
Citations: 7

Abstract

Purpose

To detect male pelvic perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) vs. controls by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) at 3T.

Materials and Methods

Eighteen male patients were studied with T1-weighted (T1W) DCE-MRI to measure perfusion, phase-contrast (PC) imaging to measure bulk flow, and contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRA to detect stenosis. Regions of interest (ROIs) in prostate, corpus cavernosal, and spongiosal tissues were analyzed. Two-compartment pharmacokinetic modeling was employed to fit the signal enhancement. Perfusion parameters were analyzed by curve-fitting and utilized to compare the CAD and control groups. Validated questionnaires measuring urinary and erectile function were used to evaluate pelvic symptomatology in both groups.

Results

Mean perfusion analysis confirmed weaker and slower enhancement in CAD patients vs. controls despite equivalent cardiac output values. The mean maximum enhancement was 26.33 ± 0.12 (controls) vs. 22.38 ± 0.44 (CAD) for prostate. The mean wash-in rate in units of minute–1 was 62.10 ± 1.74 (controls) vs. 34.44 ± 1.08 (CAD) for prostate, 16.68 ± 0.72 (controls) vs. 8.04 ± 0.36 (CAD) for spongiosal, and 8.34 ± 0.54 (controls) vs. 3.48 ± 0.24 (CAD) for cavernosal tissues (all with P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

This preliminary study demonstrates that perfusion parameters differ between CAD and control patients, and the findings mirror the differences in pelvic symptoms in these groups. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.