Volume 24, Issue 5 pp. 1088-1094
Original Research

Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: Clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection

Waleed Ajaj MD

Corresponding Author

Waleed Ajaj MD

Medical Center, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Hospital Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 22046 Hamburg, GermanySearch for more papers by this author
Stefan G. Ruehm MD

Stefan G. Ruehm MD

David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Guido Gerken MD

Guido Gerken MD

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Mathias Goyen MD

Mathias Goyen MD

Medical Center, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 October 2006
Citations: 17

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the clinical relevance of dark-lumen MR colonography (MRC) for the detection of colorectal lesions using conventional colonoscopy (CC) and histopathologic examinations as reference standard.

Materials and Methods

A total of 72 patients underwent MRC and CC. MRC was performed using a contrast-enhanced high spatial resolution T1 weighted 3D volumetric interpolated breathhold examination (VIBE)-sequence. All removed colorectal lesions were evaluated by an experienced pathologist.

Results

CC confirmed 65 polyps less than 5 mm in diameter. Non of those lesions could be detected using MRC. Just two (4%) of the 49 removed lesions smaller than 5 mm showed signs of dysplasia. Additionally, CC confirmed 25 polyps between 6–15 mm in diameter (MRC 22). All those 25 lesions were removed in CC. Only four (16%) of those polyps showed signs of dysplasia and malignancy (11, 13, 13 and 15 mm).

Conclusion

Dark-lumen MRC failed to detect all polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter which are generally not clinically relevant at the moment of their detection and thus can be kept under surveillance. However, MRC as a non-invasive imaging modality is a promising alternative to CC in the detection of clinically relevant polyps larger than 5 mm in diameter. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.