Volume 7, Issue 5 pp. 774-783
Review
Full Access

Imaging of nodal metastases in the head and neck

Yoshimi Anzai MD

Corresponding Author

Yoshimi Anzai MD

Department of Radiology, the University of Michigan Hospital, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030

Department of Radiology, the University of Michigan Hospital, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030Search for more papers by this author
James A. Brunberg MD

James A. Brunberg MD

Department of Radiology, the University of Michigan Hospital, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030

Search for more papers by this author
Robert B. Lufkin MD

Robert B. Lufkin MD

Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 November 2005
Citations: 55

Abstract

Therapeutic outcome of head and neck cancer is influenced strongly by the presence of nodal metastases. Sensitivity and specificity of the physical examination for the diagnosis of nodal metastasis is unsatisfactory, resulting in both false negatives and false positives of 25 to 40%. Preoperative detection of nodal metastases therefore becomes one of the important goals of imaging studies of patients with head and neck cancer. Despite several advanced techniques and the wide clinical use of MR, MR has surprisingly added little to the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT. Although CT and MR allow detection of abnormally enlarged nodes or necrotic nodes, neither borderline-sized nodes without necrosis nor extracapsular spread are reliably differentiated from reactive or normal nodes in patients with head and neck cancer. Lack of definitive diagnostic methods of metastatic lymph nodes is a serious shortcoming in the preoperative workup for patients with head and neck cancer. To avoid missing small metastatic nodes, a large number of patients clinically staged as NO have undergone elective neck dissection to exclude metastases. With development of more tissue-specific imaging techniques, patients can be better characterized according to the status of nodal disease so that an appropriate therapeutic protocol can be designed for an individual case.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.