Volume 2, Issue 4 pp. 463-471
Original Research
Full Access

Diagnosis of fatty liver with MR imaging

Burkhard P. Kreft MD

Burkhard P. Kreft MD

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Search for more papers by this author
Akihiro Tanimoto MD

Akihiro Tanimoto MD

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Search for more papers by this author
Yuji Baba MD

Yuji Baba MD

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Search for more papers by this author
Longhai Zhao MD

Longhai Zhao MD

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Search for more papers by this author
John Chen

John Chen

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Search for more papers by this author
Michael S. Middleton MD

Michael S. Middleton MD

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego

Search for more papers by this author
Carolyn C. Compton PhD, MD

Carolyn C. Compton PhD, MD

Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Search for more papers by this author
J. Paul Finn MD

J. Paul Finn MD

Department of Radiology, New England Deaconess Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston

Search for more papers by this author
David D. Stark MD

Corresponding Author

David D. Stark MD

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA 01605Search for more papers by this author
First published: July/August 1992
Citations: 48

Abstract

The diagnosis of fatty liver with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was evaluated in experimental rat models of simple fatty infiltration and fatty liver with hepatocellular injury. T1 and T2 were measured ex vivo and correlated with the histologic degree of fatty infiltration. Enhancement of fatty liver with four different cell-specific contrast agents was studied with ex vivo relaxometry and in vivo MR imaging. Quantitative analysis of conventional and chemical shift MR images was correlated with biochemically determined fat content of the liver. Diet-induced simple fatty infiltration of the liver caused a decrease in T1 of 15%, whereas the T1 of L-ethionine-induced fatty liver with hepatocellular injury increased by 12%. T2 showed a positive correlation with the degree of fatty infiltration in both models. Cell-specific hepatobiliary contrast agents showed the same liver uptake and relaxation enhancement in fatty livers as in normal livers. Conventional T1-weighted images and chemical shift images showed good correlation (r =.83 and.80, respectively) between signal intensity and the degree of fatty infiltration. However, only chemical shift imaging was reliable in the diagnosis of fatty liver.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.