Volume 28, Issue 12 pp. 1031-1046
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Surgery versus external beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma involving the inferior vena cava or right atrium: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Han Ah Lee

Han Ah Lee

Department of Gastroenterology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Sunmin Park

Sunmin Park

Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Ansan, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Yeon Seok Seo

Yeon Seok Seo

Department of Gastroenterology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Won Sup Yoon

Won Sup Yoon

Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Ansan, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
In-Soo Shin

In-Soo Shin

Graduation School of Education, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Chai Hong Rim

Corresponding Author

Chai Hong Rim

Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Ansan, Korea

Correspondence

Chai Hong Rim, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan, Gyeonggido 15355, Korea.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 November 2020
Citations: 6
Lee and Park contributed equally to the study.

Abstract

We investigated the efficacy and safety of surgery and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involving the inferior vena cava (IVC) and/or right atrium (RA) through a comparative meta-analysis. A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library was performed for entries until July 2020. Eighteen studies with 22 cohorts were included, encompassing 755 patients. The pooled median overall survival (OS) and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 14.2 months, 55.6%, and 27.4%, respectively. The pooled median OS in the surgery and EBRT arms were 15.3 and 11.7 months, respectively. The pooled 1-year OS rate in the surgery arm was significantly higher than that in the EBRT arm (62.4%, 95% CI: 53.8%-70.3% vs 48.8%, 95% CI: 40.9-56.8, respectively; P = .023), while the 2-year OS rates were similar (27.5%, 95% CI: 19.7%-37.1% vs 26.9%, 95% CI: 20.7-34.2, respectively; P = .913). In the surgical arm, the perioperative mortality and grade ≥3 complication rates were 0%-7.6% and 3.9%-67%, respectively. Grade ≥3 complications and radiation-induced liver disease were rarely observed in the EBRT arm. Surgery could be an effective local modality for achieving the best survival rate, though it requires efforts to minimize morbidities and careful patient selection. EBRT, as a noninvasive modality, is a valid palliative option, especially for high-risk patients with a shorter life expectancy.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data used in the present analysis are published in other studies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.