Volume 31, Issue 1 pp. 26-30
Research Article

Sonographic assessment of changes in thickness of different abdominal fat layers in response to diet in obese women

Nuran Sabir MD

Corresponding Author

Nuran Sabir MD

Radiodiagnostic Department, Pamukkale University, Faculty of Medicine, Doktorlar Caddesi No. 42, 20100 Denizli, Turkey

Yenimahalle 3371 Sokak No. 42/1, 20020 Denizli, TurkeySearch for more papers by this author
Emre Pakdemirli MD

Emre Pakdemirli MD

Radiodiagnostic Department, Pamukkale University, Faculty of Medicine, Doktorlar Caddesi No. 42, 20100 Denizli, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Yurdaer Sermez MD

Yurdaer Sermez MD

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pamukkale University, Faculty of Medicine, Doktorlar Caddesi No. 42, 20100 Denizli, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Mehmet Zencir MD

Mehmet Zencir MD

Public Health Department, Pamukkale University, Faculty of Medicine, Doktorlar Caddesi No. 42, 20100 Denizli, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Selcuk Kazil MD

Selcuk Kazil MD

Radiodiagnostic Department, Pamukkale University, Faculty of Medicine, Doktorlar Caddesi No. 42, 20100 Denizli, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 December 2002
Citations: 28

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the potential application of sonography to monitor alterations in abdominal fat thickness in obese women before and after dieting.

Methods

This study included 40 obese women (mean age, 42.2 ± 9.4 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 36.0 ± 5.9 kg/m2) who underwent a 3-month low-calorie diet. Height, weight, waist circumference (WC), and hip circumference (HC) were measured. BMI and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were calculated. Abdominal subcutaneous (S) and intra-abdominal preperitoneal (P) fat were measured at their maximum (max) and minimum (min) thickness sites using a 7.5-MHz linear-array probe. Intra-abdominal visceral (V) fat was measured using a 3.5-MHz convex-array probe. Measurements were taken before and after caloric restriction.

Results

The mean weight was reduced from 88.6 ± 17.1 kg to 83.0 ± 15.9 kg (p < 0.0001). The mean changes in Smin (r = 0.376, p = 0.017), Smax (r = 0.508, (p = 0.001), Pmin (r = 0.439, p = 0.005), and V (r = 0.365, p = 0.022) fat thicknesses were positively correlated with change in weight; the change in Pmax fat thickness showed the best and most significant correlation (r = 0.591, p < 0.0001). BMI (r = 0.969, p < 0.0001), WC (r = 0.510, p = 0.001), and HC (r = 0.422, p = 0.007) changes were also positively correlated with weight change, but the WHR change (r = 0.019, p > 0.05) was not.

Conclusions

All the abdominal fat layers, particularly the intra-abdominal P fat, will decrease in response to loss of body fat by dieting. Sonography seems to be useful in monitoring small variations in the thicknesses of abdominal S and intra-abdominal P and V fat. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 31:26–30, 2003

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.