Dimensional versus categorical classification of prototypic and nonprototypic cases of personality disorder
Corresponding Author
June Sprock
Indiana State University
Psychology Department, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
June Sprock
Indiana State University
Psychology Department, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This study examined interrater reliability and ratings of confidence and clinical utility (professional communication, case conceptualization, treatment planning) of categorical and dimensional approaches to diagnosing prototypic and nonprototypic personality disorder cases. Two national samples of psychologists (n = 93, n = 92) participated. Interrater reliability was higher for prototypic cases than nonprototypic cases for the categorical system, but similar for prototypic and nonprototypic cases using dimensional ratings. Across cases, interrater reliability and confidence were highest for the categorical model, hybrid models, and the five-factor model. However, ratings of clinical utility were highest for the categorical and the hybrid models, even when interrater reliability was inadequate, suggesting clinician preference for a classification based on the existing categories. Mean ratings for the prototypic cases supported the theorized relationships between the dimensional models and the personality disorders. Reasons for these findings and implications for moving towards a dimensional model of personality disorder are discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.
REFERENCES
- American Psychiatric Association. ( 1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 4th ed.). Washington DC: Author.
- Benjamin, L. ( 1996). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
- Blais, M.A. ( 1997). Clinician ratings of the five-factor model of personality and the DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185(6), 388–393.
-
Blashfield, R.K. (
1984).
The classification of psychopathology.
New York:
Plenum Press.
10.1007/978-1-4613-2665-6 Google Scholar
-
Blashfield, R.K. (
1993).
Variants of categorical and dimensional models.
Psychological Inquiry, 4, 95–98.
10.1207/s15327965pli0402_3 Google Scholar
-
Blashfield, R.K., &
McElroy, R.A. (
1989).
A benchmark analysis for personality disorder research: Studies using clinicians.
Journal of Personality Disorders, 3(3), 174–179
10.1521/pedi.1989.3.3.174 Google Scholar
- Blashfield, R.K., & McElroy, R.A. ( 1995). Confusions in the terminology used for classificatory models. In W.J. Livesley (Ed.), The DSM-IV personality disorders (pp. 407–416). New York: Guilford Press.
- Blashfield, R.K., Sprock, J., Hodgins, J., & Pinkston, K. ( 1985). Exemplar prototypes of personality disorder diagnoses. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 26, 11–21.
-
Carson, R.C. (
1993).
Can the Big Five help salvage the DSM-IV?
Psychological Inquiry, 4, 98–100.
10.1207/s15327965pli0402_4 Google Scholar
- Clark, L. ( 1999). Dimensional approaches to personality disorder assessment and diagnosis. In C.R. Cloninger (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 219–244). New York: Guilford Press.
- Clark, L.A., Watson, D., & Reynolds, S. ( 1995). Diagnosis and classification. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 121–153.
- Cloninger, R.C. ( 2000). A practical way to diagnosis personality disorder: A proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 99–108.
- Cloninger, R.C., Przybeck, T.R., Svrakic, D.M., & Wetzel, R.D. ( 1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University.
- Cloninger, R.C., & Svrakic, D.M. ( 1994). In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 40–64). New York: Springer.
- Cloninger, C.R., Svrakic, D.M., & Przbeck, T.R. ( 1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 573–588.
- Coccaro, E.F. ( 2001). Biological and treatment correlates. In W.J. Livesely (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders (pp. 124–135), New York: Guilford Press.
- Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. ( 1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis in the behavioral sciences ( 2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. ( 1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Depue, R.A. ( 1996). A neurobiological framework for the structure of personality and emotion. In J.F. Clarkin & M.F. Lenzenweger (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (pp. 347–390). New York: Guilford Press.
- Depue, R.A., & Lenzenweger, M.F. ( 2001). A neurobehavioral dimensional model. In W.J. Livesely (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders (pp. 136–176), New York: Guilford Press.
- Dyce, J.A. ( 1994). Personality disorders: Alternatives to the official diagnostic system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 8, 77–88.
- Dyce, J.A., & O'Connor, B.P. ( 1998). Personality disorders and the five-factor model: A test of facet-level predictions. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12, 31–45.
-
Eysenck, H.J. (
1987).
The definition of personality disorders and the criteria appropriate for their description.
Journal of Personality Disorders, 1, 211–219.
10.1521/pedi.1987.1.3.211 Google Scholar
-
Frances, A. (
1993).
Dimensional diagnosis of personality—Not whether, but when and which.
Psychological Inquiry, 4, 110–111.
10.1207/s15327965pli0402_7 Google Scholar
- Gunderson, J.G., & Links, P. ( 1995). Borderline personality disorder. In G.O. Gabbard (Ed.), Treatment of psychiatric disorders (pp. 2291–2309). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
- Howell, D.C. ( 1997). Statistical methods for psychology ( 4th Ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
- Jackson, D.N., & Livesley, W.J. ( 1995). Possible contributions from personality assessment to the classification of personality disorders. In W.J. Livesley (Ed.), The DSM-IV personality disorders (pp. 459–481). New York: Guilford Press.
- Kass, F., Skodol, A.E., Charles, E., Spitzer, R.L., & Williams, J.B.W. ( 1985). Scaled ratings of DSM-III personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 627–630.
- Kiesler, D. ( 1986). The 1982 interpersonal circle. In T. Millon & G. Klerman (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology (pp. 571–597). New York: Guilford Press.
- Leary, T. ( 1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
- Livesley, J.W. ( 1998). Suggestions for a framework for an empirically based classification of personality disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 137–147.
- Livesley, J.W. ( 2001). Conceptual and taxonomic issues. In W.J. Livesley (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders (pp. 3–38). New York: Guilford.
- Livesley, J.W., & Jang, K.L. ( 2000). Toward as empirically based classification of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 137–151.
- Livesley, J.W., Schroeder, M.L., Jackson, D.N., & Jang, K.L. ( 1994). Categorical distinctions in the study of personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 6–17.
- Locke, K.D. ( 2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values. Assessment, 75, 249–267.
- Loranger, A.W. ( 1999). Categorical approaches to the diagnosis of personality disorder. In C.R. Cloninger (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 201–217). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
- Lynam, D.R., & Widiger, T.A. ( 2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401–412.
- McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. ( 1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.
- Morey, L.C., Gunderson, J., Quigley, B.D., & Lyons, M. ( 2000). Dimensions and categories: The “big five” factors and the DSM personality disorders. Assessment, 7, 203–216.
- Nichols, D.P. ( 1998). Choosing an intraclass correlation. Technical Support-Statistical Articles. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
- Oldham, J.M., & Skodol, A.E. ( 2000). Charting the future of Axis II. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 17–29.
-
Pincus, A.L., &
Wiggins, J.S. (
1990).
Interpersonal problems and conceptions of personality disorders.
Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 342–352.
10.1521/pedi.1990.4.4.342 Google Scholar
-
Sadler, J.Z. (
1996).
Epistemic value commitments in the debate over categorical vs. dimensional personality diagnosis.
Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 3, 203–222.
10.1353/ppp.1996.0035 Google Scholar
-
Schacht, T.E. (
1993).
How do I diagnose thee? Let me count the ways.
Psychological Inquiry, 4, 115–118.
10.1207/s15327965pli0402_10 Google Scholar
- Shrout, P.E., & Fleiss, J.L. ( 1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 410–428.
- Siever, L.J., & Davis, K.L. ( 1991). A psychobiological perspective on the personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1647–1658.
-
Soldz, S.,
Budman, S.,
Demby, A., &
Merry, J. (
1993).
Representation of personality disorders in circumplex and five-factor space.
Psychological Assessment, 5, 41–52.
10.1037/1040-3590.5.1.41 Google Scholar
- Soloff, P.H. ( 1998). Algorithms for pharmacological treatment of personality disorder dimensions. Bulletin of the Meninger Clinic, 62, 195–214.
- Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Skodol, A.E., Williams, J.B.W., & First, M.B. ( 1989). DSM-III-R case book (pp. 80–81). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
- Sprock, J. ( 2002). A comparative study of the dimensions and facets of the five-factor model in the diagnosis of cases of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, 402–423.
- Sprock, J., & Blashfield, R.K. ( 1991). Classification and nosology. In M. Hersen, A.E. Kazdin, & A.S. Bellack (Eds.), The clinical psychology handbook ( 2nd ed., pp. 329–344). New York: Pergamon Press.
- SPSS, Inc. ( 1999). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Version 10.0. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
- Strube, M.J. ( 2000). Reliability and generalizability theory. In L.G. Grimm & P.R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 23–66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Svrakic, D.M., Whitehead, C., Przybeck, T.R., & Cloninger, C.R. ( 1993). Differential diagnosis of personality disorders by the seven-factor model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 991–999.
- Trestman, R.L., WooMing, A.M., deVegvar, M., & Siever, L.J. ( 2001). Treatment of personality disorders. In A.F. Schatzberg & C.B. Nemeroff (Eds.), Essentials of clinical psychopharmacology (pp. 271–587). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
- Tyrer, P.T. ( 1996). New ways of classifying personality disorder. Psychiatriki, 7, 43–48.
- Tyrer, P.T., & Johnson, T. ( 1996). Establishing the severity of personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1593–1597.
- Westen, D. ( 1997). Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 895–903.
- Westen, D., & Arkowitz-Westen, L. ( 1998). Limitations of Axis II in diagnosing personality pathology in clinical practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1767–1771.
- Westen, D., & Shedler, J. ( 1999). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part II. Toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 273–285.
- Westen, D., & Shedler, J. ( 2000). A prototype matching approach to diagnosing personality disorders: Toward DSM-V. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 109–126.
-
Widiger, T.A. (
1993).
The DSM-III-R categorical personality disorders: A critique and an alternative.
Psychological Inquiry, 4, 75–90.
10.1207/s15327965pli0402_1 Google Scholar
- Widiger, T.A. ( 2000). Personality disorders in the 21st Century. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 3–16.
-
Widiger, T.A., &
Frances, A.J. (
1994).
Toward a dimensional model for the personality disorders. In
P.T. Costa &
T.A. Widiger (Eds.),
Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 19–39).
Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
10.1037/10140-002 Google Scholar
- Widiger, T.A., & Sanderson, C.J. ( 1995). Towards a dimensional model of personality disorders. In W.J. Livesley (Ed.), The DSM-IV personality disorders (pp. 433–458). New York: Guilford Press.
- Widiger, T.A., & Sankis, L.M. ( 2000). Adult psychopathology: Issues and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 377–395.
-
Widiger, T.A.,
Trull, T.J.,
Clarkin, J.F.,
Sanderson, C., &
Costa, P.T. (
1994).
A description of the DSM-IIIR and DSM-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model of personality. In
P.T. Costa &
T.A. Widiger (Eds.),
Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 19–49).
Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
10.1037/10140-002 Google Scholar
-
Wiggins, J.S., &
Pincus, A.L. (
1994).
Personality structure and the structure of personality disorders. In
P.T. Costa &
T.A. Widiger (Eds.),
Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 73–93).
Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
10.1037/10140-023 Google Scholar