Influence of scaffold design on 3D printed cell constructs
Auryn Souness
Department of Civil Engineering and Materials Science, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorFernanda Zamboni
Stokes Laboratories, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorGavin M Walker
Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Maurice N Collins
Stokes Laboratories, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Correspondence to: M. N. Collins; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAuryn Souness
Department of Civil Engineering and Materials Science, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorFernanda Zamboni
Stokes Laboratories, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorGavin M Walker
Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Maurice N Collins
Stokes Laboratories, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Correspondence to: M. N. Collins; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Additive manufacturing is currently receiving significant attention in the field of tissue engineering and biomaterial science. The development of precise, affordable 3D printing technologies has provided a new platform for novel research to be undertaken in 3D scaffold design and fabrication. In the past, a number of 3D scaffold designs have been fabricated to investigate the potential of a 3D printed scaffold as a construct which could support cellular life. These studies have shown promising results; however, few studies have utilized a low-cost desktop 3D printing technology as a potential rapid manufacturing route for different scaffold designs. Here six scaffold designs were manufactured using a Fused deposition modeling, a “bottom-up” solid freeform fabrication approach, to determine optimal scaffold architecture for three-dimensional cell growth. The scaffolds, produced from PLA, are coated using pullulan and hyaluronic acid to assess the coating influence on cell proliferation and metabolic rate. Scaffolds are characterized both pre- and postprocessing using water uptake analysis, mechanical testing, and morphological evaluation to study the inter-relationships between the printing process, scaffold design, and scaffold properties. It was found that there were key differences between each scaffold design in terms of porosity, diffusivity, swellability, and compressive strength. An optimal design was chosen based on these physical measurements which were then weighted in accordance to design importance based on literature and utilizing a design matrix technique. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 533–545, 2018.
REFERENCES
- 1 Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science 1993; 260: 920–926.
- 2 Collins MN, Birkinshaw C. Hyaluronic acid based scaffolds for tissue engineering – A review. Carbohydr Polym 2013; 92: 1262–1279.
- 3 Kulinski Z, Piorkowska E. Crystallization, structure and properties of plasticized poly(L-lactide). Polymer 2005; 46: 10290–10300.
- 4 Gupta AP, Kumar V. New emerging trends in synthetic biodegradable polymers—Polylactide: A critique. Eur Polym J 2007; 43: 4053–4074.
- 5 Ruan G, Feng SS. Preparation and characterization of poly(lactic acid)–poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(lactic acid) (PLA–PEG–PLA) microspheres for controlled release of paclitaxel. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 5037–5044.
- 6 Ignatova M, Manolova N, Markova N, Rashkov I. Electrospun non-woven nanofibrous hybrid mats based on chitosan and PLA for wound-dressing applications. Macromol Biosci 2009; 9: 102–111.
- 7
Sittinger M,
Reitzel D,
Dauner M,
Hierlemann H,
Hammer C,
Kastenbauer E,
Planck H,
Burmester GR,
Bujia J. Resorbable polyesters in cartilage engineering: Affinity and biocompatibility of polymer fiber structures to chondrocytes. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 33: 57–63.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199622)33:2<57::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-K CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 8 Alexander H, Parsons JR, Strauchler ID, Corcoran SF, Cona O, Mayott CW. Canine patellar tendon replacement with a polylactic acid polymer-filamentous carbon tissue scaffold. Orthop Rev 1981; 10: 41–51.
- 9 Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. Int J Polym Sci 2011; 2011: 1–19
- 10 Malinauskas M, Rekštyte S, Lukoševicius L, Butkus S, Balciunas E, Peciukaityte M, Baltriukiene D, Bukelskiene V, Butkevicius A, Kucevicius P, Rutkunas V, Juodkazis S. 3D microporous scaffolds manufactured via combination of fused filament fabrication and direct laser writing ablation. Micromachines 2014; 5: 839–858.
- 11 Rosenzweig DH, Carelli E, Steffen T, Jarzem P, Haglund L. 3D-printed ABS and PLA scaffolds for cartilage and nucleus pulposus tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16: 15118–15135.
- 12 Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1169–1185.
- 13 Serra T, Planell JA, Navarro M. High-resolution PLA-based composite scaffolds via 3-D printing technology. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 5521–5530.
- 14 Almeida CR, Serra T, Oliveira MI, Planell JA, Barbosa MA, Navarro M. Impact of 3-D printed PLA- and chitosan-based scaffolds on human monocyte/macrophage responses: Unraveling the effect of 3-D structures on inflammation. Acta Biomater 2014; 10: 613–622.
- 15 Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 2529–2543.
- 16
de Ciurana J,
Serenó L,
Vallès È. Selecting process parameters in RepRap additive manufacturing system for PLA scaffolds manufacture, Procedia CIRP 2013; 5: 152–157.
10.1016/j.procir.2013.01.031 Google Scholar
- 17 Farzardi A, Solati-Hashjin M, Asadi-Eydivand M, Abu Osman NA. Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed porous samples for bone tissue engineering, PLoS One 2014; 9: 1–14.
- 18 Asadi-Eydivand M, Solati-Hashjin M, Fathi A, Padashi M, Abu Osman NA. Optimal design of a 3D-printed scaffold using intelligent evolutionary algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 2016; 39: 36–47.
- 19 Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, Lam C, Tan KC, Lim TC. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2007; 1: 245–260.
- 20 Moroni L, Elisseeff JH. Biomaterials engineered for integration, Mater Today 2008; 11: 44–51.
- 21 Fraser JR, Laurent TC, Laurent UB. Hyaluronan: Its nature, distribution, functions and turnover. J Intern Med 1997; 242: 27–33.
- 22 Necas J, Bartosikova L, Brauner P, Kolar J. Hyaluronic acid (hyaluronan): A review. Veterinarni Medicina 2008; 53: 397–411.
- 23 Zawko SA, Suri S, Truong Q, Schmidt CE. Photopatterned anisotropic swelling of dual-crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 14–22.
- 24 Collins MN, Birkinshaw C. Morphology of crosslinked hyaluronic acid porous hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci 2011; 120: 1040–1049.
- 25 Valachová K, Baňasová M, TopoI'ská D, Sasinková V, Juránek I, Collins MN, Šoltés L. Influence of tiopronin, captopril and levamisole therepeutics on the oxidative degradation of hyaluronan. Carbohydr Polym 2015; 134: 516–523.
- 26 Valachová K, Topoľská D, Mendichi R, Collins MN, Sasinková V, Šoltés L. Hydrogen peroxide generation by the Weissberger biogenic oxidative system during hyaluronan degradation. Carbohydr Polym 2016; 148: 189–193.
- 27 Collins MN, Birkinshaw C. Physical properties of crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 3335–3343.
- 28 Collins MN, Birkinshaw C. Comparison of the effectiveness of four crosslinkers with hyaluronic acid for tissue culture applications. J Appl Polym Sci 2007; 104: 3183–3191.
- 29 Collins MN, Birkinshaw C. Investigation of the swelling behavior of crosslinked hyaluronic acid films and hydrogels produced using homogeneous reactions, J Appl Polym Sci 2008; 109: 923–931.
- 30 Li J, Zhang K, Chen H, Liu T, Yang P, Zhao Y, Huang N. A novel coating of type IV collagen and hyaluronic acid on stent material-titanium for promoting smooth muscle cell contractile phenotype, Mater Sci Eng C 2014; 38: 235–243.
- 31 Yoo HS, Lee EA, Yoon JJ, Park TG. Hyaluronic acid modified biodegradable scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1925–1933.
- 32 Nath SD, Abueva C, Kim B, Lee BT. Chitosan–hyaluronic acid polyelectrolyte complex scaffoldcrosslinked with genipin for immobilization and controlled release of BMP-2. Carbohydr Polym 2015; 115: 160–169.
- 33 Vijayendra SV, Shamala TR. Film forming microbial biopolymers for commercial applications—A review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2014; 34: 338–357.
- 34 Jabbari E, Khandemhosseini A Biologically-Responsive Hybrid Biomaterials: A Reference for Material Scientists and Bioengineers, 1st ed. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 2010. pp. 101–121.
- 35 Zhu J, Marchant RE. Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev Med Devices 2011; 8: 607–626.
- 36 Bulman SE, Coleman CM, Murphy JM, Medcalf N, Ryan AE, Barry F. Pullulan: A new cytoadhesive for cell-mediated cartilage repair. Stem Cell Res Therap 2015; 6: 34.
- 37 Autissier A, Letourneur D, Le Visage C. Pullulan-based hydrogel for smooth muscle cell culture. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 82: 336–342.
- 38 Seo S, Na K. Use of growth factor-loaded acetylated polysaccharide as a coating material to improve endothelialization of vascular stents. Macromol Res 2011; 19: 1097–1103.
- 39 Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Ota MS, Shimoda A, Nakahama K, Akiyoshi K, Miyamoto Y, Iseki S. Cholesteryl group- and acryloyl group-bearing pullulan nanogel to deliver BMP2 and FGF18 for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 7613–7620.
- 40 Ryan CNM, Fuller KP, Larrañaga A, Biggs M, Bayon Y, Sarasua JR, Pandit A, Zeugolis DI. An academic, clinical and industrial update on electrospun, additive manufactured and imprinted medical devices. Expert Rev Med Devices 2015; 12: 601–612
- 41CEL-Robox. FFF 3D printing heads [online], available: http://www.cel-robox.com/[accessed 9 May 2016].
- 42
Murphy CA,
Collins MN. Microcrystalline cellulose reinforced PLA biocomposite filaments for 3D printing. Polym Compos 2016. DOI: 10.1002/pc.24069.
10.1002/pc.24069 Google Scholar
- 43 Collins MN, Birkinshaw C. Hyaluronic acid solutions – A processing method for chemical modification. J Appl Polym Sci 2013; 130: 145–152
- 44 Zhai W, Ko Y, Zhu W, Wong A, Park CB. A study of the crystallization, melting, and foaming behaviors of polylactic acid in compressed CO2. Int J Mol Sci 2009 10: 5381–5397.
- 45 Siparsky GL, Voorhees KJ, Dorgan JR, Schilling K. Water transport in polylactic acid (PLA), PLA/polycaprolactone copolymers, and PLA/polyethylene glycol blends. J Environ Polym Degrad 1997; 5: 125–136.
- 46 Havaldar R, Pilli SC, Putti BB. Insights into the effects of tensile and compressive loadings on human femur bone, Adv Biomed Res 2014; 3: 101.