Volume 102, Issue 6 pp. 1217-1222
Original Report

The effect of stem material and surface treatment on the torsional stability at the metal–cement interface of upper limb joint replacement systems

Yara K. Hosein

Yara K. Hosein

Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9

Search for more papers by this author
Graham J. W. King

Graham J. W. King

Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9

Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9

Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9

Search for more papers by this author
Cynthia E. Dunning

Corresponding Author

Cynthia E. Dunning

Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9

Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9

Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9

Department of Materials & Mechanical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9

Correspondence to: C. E. Dunning (e-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 February 2014
Citations: 3

Abstract

Stem surface treatment and material are two design factors that may affect the onset of implant loosening. For upper limb applications, no known in vitro studies have addressed the role of these two factors on cemented implant stability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the torsional stability of cemented titanium and cobalt chrome stems with varying surface treatments in vitro. Thirty implant stems of circular cross-section (Ø = 8mm) were machined from cobalt chrome (n = 15) and titanium (n = 15). For each type, stems were subdivided into three groups for application of clinically relevant surface treatments: smooth, sintered beads, or plasma spray. Stems were potted in bone cement, allowed 24 h to cure, and placed in a materials testing machine. Stems were tested under cyclic torsion (1–30 Nm), using a staircase loading protocol. Failure was defined as either the first rapid increase in stem rotation without resistance, or attaining a maximum torque of 30 Nm. Implant stems with non-smooth surfaces offered greater resistance to torsion (p < 0.05), with the plasma spray treatment outlasting the beaded and smooth stems (p < 0.05). Titanium offered superior interface strength (p < 0.05) but reduced resistance to motion (p < 0.05) when compared to cobalt chrome. Therefore, these design features should be considered during upper limb implant design. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 1217–1222, 2014.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.