Gradient hydrogels for screening stiffness effects on patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft cellfates in 3D
Danqing Zhu
Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorPavin Trinh
Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJianfeng Li
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorGerry A. Grant
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Fan Yang
Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Correspondence
Fan Yang, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Bioengineering, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Dr., Edwards R105, Stanford, CA, 94305-5341.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDanqing Zhu
Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorPavin Trinh
Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJianfeng Li
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorGerry A. Grant
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Fan Yang
Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Correspondence
Fan Yang, Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Bioengineering, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Dr., Edwards R105, Stanford, CA, 94305-5341.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDanqing Zhu, Pavin Trinh, and Fan Yang contributed equally to this work.
Funding information: NIH-NIDCR, Grant/Award Numbers: 1R01AR074502, NIH R01DE024772; Stanford Bio-X IIP grant award; Stanford Child Health Research Institute Faculty Scholar Award
Abstract
Brain cancer is a devastating disease given its extreme invasiveness and intricate location. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most common forms of brain cancer, and cancer progression is often correlated with significantly altered tissue stiffness. To elucidate the effect of matrix stiffness on GBM cell fates, previous research is largely limited to 2D studies using immortalized cell lines, which has limited physiological relevance. The objective of the study is to develop gradient hydrogels with brain-mimicking stiffness range as a 3Din vitro GBM model for screening of the effects of matrix stiffness on GBM. To increase the physiological relevance, patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) GBM cells were used. Our gradient platform allows formation of cell-containing hydrogels with stiffness ranging from 40 Pa to 1,300 Pa within a few minutes. By focusing on a brain-mimicking stiffness range, this gradient hydrogel platform is designed for investigating brain cancer. Increasing stiffness led to decreased GBM proliferation and less spreading, which is accompanied by downregulation of matrix-metalloproteinases (MMPs). Using temozolomide (TMZ) as a model drug, we demonstrate that increasing stiffness led to higher drug resistance by PDTX GBM cells in 3D, suggesting matrix stiffness can directly modulate how GBM cells respond to drug treatment. While the current study focuses on stiffness gradient, the setup may also be adapted for screening other cancer niche cues such as how biochemical ligand gradient modulates brain cancer progression and drug responses using reduced materials and time.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
jbma37093-sup-0001-FigureS1.tifTIFF image, 10 MB | Figure S1 (A) Schematic illustration of 3D gradient hydrogel. (B) A cellular gradient hydrogels exhibit compressive modulus increased 40-fold from 29 Pa to 1,167 Pa across gradient hydrogels (n = 3). No significant change in hydrogel stiffness over 21 days of culture, indicating a high stability of the fabricated hydrogels. (C) Swelling ratio of each zone of gradient hydrogel on Day 1 and Day 21. Swelling ratio was calculated as the ratio of wet weight divided by dry weight. |
jbma37093-sup-0002-FigureS2.tifTIFF image, 10 MB | Figure S2 PTDX GBM cell morphology through bright-field imaging on days 1, 7, 10, 14, and 21 of culture. Scale bar = 100 μm. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Ostrom QT et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006-2010. Neuro Oncol. 2013; 15(Suppl 2): ii1-ii56.
- 2Alves TR, Lima FRS, Kahn SA, et al. Glioblastoma cells: a heterogeneous and fatal tumor interacting with the parenchyma. Life Sci. 2011; 89(15): 532-539.
- 3Bellail AC, Hunter SB, Brat DJ, Tan C, van Meir EG. Microregional extracellular matrix heterogeneity in brain modulates glioma cell invasion. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004; 36(6): 1046-1069.
- 4Wang C, Tong X, Jiang X, Yang F. Effect of matrix metalloproteinase-mediated matrix degradation on glioblastoma cell behavior in 3D PEG-based hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017; 105(3): 770-778.
- 5Zamecnik J. The extracellular space and matrix of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2005; 110(5): 435-442.
- 6Gladson CL. The extracellular matrix of gliomas: modulation of cell function. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999; 58(10): 1029-1040.
- 7Higuchi M, Ohnishi T, Arita N, Hiraga S, Hayakawa T. Expression of tenascin in human gliomas: its relation to histological malignancy, tumor dedifferentiation and angiogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 1993; 85(5): 481-487.
- 8Roberts DD. Regulation of tumor growth and metastasis by thrombospondin-1. FASEB J. 1996; 10(10): 1183-1191.
- 9Sage EH. Terms of attachment: SPARC and tumorigenesis. Nat Med. 1997; 3(2): 144-146.
- 10Delpech B, Maingonnat C, Girard N, et al. Hyaluronan and hyaluronectin in the extracellular matrix of human brain tumour stroma. Eur J Cancer. 1993; 29a(7): 1012-1017.
- 11Akiyama Y, Jung S, Salhia B, et al. Hyaluronate receptors mediating glioma cell migration and proliferation. J Neurooncol. 2001; 53(2): 115-127.
- 12Koochekpour S, Pilkington GJ, Merzak A. Hyaluronic acid/CD44H interaction induces cell detachment and stimulates migration and invasion of human glioma cells in vitro. Int J Cancer. 1995; 63(3): 450-454.
- 13Abe T, Mori T, Kohno K, et al. Expression of 72 kDa type IV collagenase and invasion activity of human glioma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1994; 12(4): 296-304.
- 14Forsyth PA, Wong H, Laing TD, et al. Gelatinase-a (MMP-2), gelatinase-B (MMP-9) and membrane type matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MT1-MMP) are involved in different aspects of the pathophysiology of malignant gliomas. Br J Cancer. 1999; 79(11–12): 1828-1835.
- 15Umesh V, Rape AD, Ulrich TA, Kumar S. Microenvironmental stiffness enhances glioma cell proliferation by stimulating epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e101771.
- 16Grundy TJ, de Leon E, Griffin KR, et al. Differential response of patient-derived primary glioblastoma cells to environmental stiffness. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 23353.
- 17Polacheck WJ, Zervantonakis IK, Kamm RD. Tumor cell migration in complex microenvironments. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013; 70(8): 1335-1356.
- 18Jamin Y, Boult JKR, Li J, et al. Exploring the biomechanical properties of brain malignancies and their pathological determinants in vivo with magnetic resonance elastography. Cancer Res. 2015; 75(7): 1216-1224.
- 19Kuroiwa T, Ueki M, Ichiki H, et al. Time course of tissue elasticity and fluidity in vasogenic brain edema. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1997; 70: 87-90.
- 20Liu L, Zhang SX, Liao W, et al. Mechanoresponsive stem cells to target cancer metastases through biophysical cues. Sci Transl Med. 2017; 9(400): eaan2966.
- 21Ulrich TA, de Juan Pardo EM, Kumar S. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res. 2009; 69(10): 4167-4174.
- 22Heffernan JM, Overstreet DJ, le LD, Vernon BL, Sirianni RW. Bioengineered scaffolds for 3D analysis of glioblastoma proliferation and invasion. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015; 43(8): 1965-1977.
- 23Wang C, Tong X, Yang F. Bioengineered 3D brain tumor model to elucidate the effects of matrix stiffness on glioblastoma cell behavior using PEG-based hydrogels. Mol Pharm. 2014; 11(7): 2115-2125.
- 24Pedron S, Becka E, Harley BA. Spatially gradated hydrogel platform as a 3D engineered tumor microenvironment. Adv Mater. 2015; 27(9): 1567-1572.
- 25Rape AD et al. A synthetic hydrogel for the high-throughput study of cell–ECM interactions. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 8129.
- 26Pedron S, Polishetty H, Pritchard AM, Mahadik BP, Sarkaria JN, Harley BAC. Spatially graded hydrogels for preclinical testing of glioblastoma anticancer therapeutics. MRS Commun. 2017; 7(3): 442-449.
- 27Tong X, Jiang J, Zhu D, Yang F. Hydrogels with dual gradients of mechanical and biochemical cues for deciphering cell-niche interactions. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016; 2(5): 845-852.
- 28Chatterjee K, Young MF, Simon CG. Fabricating gradient hydrogel scaffolds for 3D cell culture. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2011; 14(4): 227-236.
- 29Allen M et al. Origin of the U87MG glioma cell line: good news and bad news. Science Translational Medicine. 2016; 8(354): 354re3-354re3.
- 30Xiao W, Sohrabi A, Seidlits SK. Integrating the glioblastoma microenvironment into engineered experimental models. Future Sci. 2017; 3(3):FSO189.
- 31Fairbanks BD, Schwartz MP, Halevi AE, Nuttelman CR, Bowman CN, Anseth KS. A versatile synthetic extracellular matrix mimic via thiol-Norbornene Photopolymerization. Adv Mater. 2009; 21(48): 5005-5010.
- 32Anderson SB, Lin CC, Kuntzler DV, Anseth KS. The performance of human mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in cell-degradable polymer-peptide hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2011; 32(14): 3564-3574.
- 33Bigner SH, Humphrey PA, Wong AJ, et al. Characterization of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human glioma cell lines and xenografts. Cancer Res. 1990; 50(24): 8017-8022.
- 34Wong AJ, Ruppert JM, Bigner SH, et al. Structural alterations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in human gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89(7): 2965-2969.
- 35Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3(6): 1101-1108.
- 36Zhu D, Tong X, Trinh P, Yang F. Mimicking cartilage tissue zonal organization by engineering tissue-scale gradient hydrogels as 3D cell niche. Tissue Eng Part A. 2018; 24(1–2): 1-10.
- 37Unsgaard G et al. Intra-operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006; 148(3): 235-253. discussion 253.
- 38Pedron S, Harley BA. Impact of the biophysical features of a 3D gelatin microenvironment on glioblastoma malignancy. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013; 101(12): 3404-3415.
- 39Loessner D, Stok KS, Lutolf MP, Hutmacher DW, Clements JA, Rizzi SC. Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(32): 8494-8506.
- 40Kaufman LJ, Brangwynne CP, Kasza KE, et al. Glioma expansion in collagen I matrices: analyzing collagen concentration-dependent growth and motility patterns. Biophys J. 2005; 89(1): 635-650.
- 41Ananthanarayanan B, Kim Y, Kumar S. Elucidating the mechanobiology of malignant brain tumors using a brain matrix-mimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. Biomaterials. 2011; 32(31): 7913-7923.
- 42Zustiak SP, Leach JB. Hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules. 2010; 11(5): 1348-1357.
- 43Elkin BS, Azeloglu EU, Costa KD, Morrison B III. Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation. J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24(5): 812-822.
- 44Christ AF, Franze K, Gautier H, et al. Mechanical difference between white and gray matter in the rat cerebellum measured by scanning force microscopy. J Biomech. 2010; 43(15): 2986-2992.
- 45Ulrich TA, Jain A, Tanner K, MacKay JL, Kumar S. Probing cellular mechanobiology in three-dimensional culture with collagen-agarose matrices. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(7): 1875-1884.
- 46da Hora CC et al. Patient-derived glioma models: from patients to dish to animals. Cell. 2019; 8(10): 1177.
- 47Pathak A, Kumar S. Independent regulation of tumor cell migration by matrix stiffness and confinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(26): 10334-10339.
- 48Anand M, Van Meter TE, Fillmore HL. Epidermal growth factor induces matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) expression and invasion in glioma cell lines via the MAPK pathway. J Neurooncol. 2011; 104(3): 679-687.
- 49Yu Q, Stamenkovic I. Cell surface-localized matrix metalloproteinase-9 proteolytically activates TGF-beta and promotes tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Genes Dev. 2000; 14(2): 163-176.
- 50Platten M, Wick W, Weller M. Malignant glioma biology: role for TGF-beta in growth, motility, angiogenesis, and immune escape. Microsc Res Tech. 2001; 52(4): 401-410.
10.1002/1097-0029(20010215)52:4<401::AID-JEMT1025>3.0.CO;2-C CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 51Hagemann C, Anacker J, Ernestus RI, Vince GH. A complete compilation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in human malignant gliomas. World J Clin Oncol. 2012; 3(5): 67-79.
- 52Le DM et al. Exploitation of astrocytes by glioma cells to facilitate invasiveness: a mechanism involving matrix metalloproteinase-2 and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator-plasmin cascade. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(10): 4034-4043.
- 53Coniglio SJ, Segall JE. Review: molecular mechanism of microglia stimulated glioblastoma invasion. Matrix Biol. 2013; 32(7): 372-380.
- 54Du R et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 regulates vascular patterning and growth affecting tumor cell survival and invasion in GBM. Neuro Oncol. 2008; 10(3): 254-264.
- 55Beadle C, Assanah MC, Monzo P, Vallee R, Rosenfeld SS, Canoll P. The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain. Mol Biol Cell. 2008; 19(8): 3357-3368.
- 56Friedl P, Wolf K. Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3(5): 362-374.
- 57Omuro A, DeAngelis LM. Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review. Jama. 2013; 310(17): 1842-1850.
- 58Friedman HS, Kerby T, Calvert H. Temozolomide and treatment of malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6(7): 2585-2597.
- 59Roos WP, Batista LFZ, Naumann SC, et al. Apoptosis in malignant glioma cells triggered by the temozolomide-induced DNA lesion O6-methylguanine. Oncogene. 2007; 26(2): 186-197.
- 60Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, Yang L. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014; 12(4): 207-218.