Modulating local S1P receptor signaling as a regenerative immunotherapy after volumetric muscle loss injury
Lauren A. Hymel
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMolly E. Ogle
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorShannon E. Anderson
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCheryl L. San Emeterio
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorThomas C. Turner
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorWilliam Y. York
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlan Y. Liu
George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorClaire E. Olingy
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSraeyes Sridhar
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorHong Seo Lim
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorTodd Sulchek
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorPeng Qiu
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorYoung C. Jang
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorNick J. Willett
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Department of Orthopedics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Atlanta Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Edward A. Botchwey
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Correspondence
Edward A. Botchwey, Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLauren A. Hymel
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMolly E. Ogle
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorShannon E. Anderson
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCheryl L. San Emeterio
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorThomas C. Turner
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorWilliam Y. York
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlan Y. Liu
George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorClaire E. Olingy
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSraeyes Sridhar
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorHong Seo Lim
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorTodd Sulchek
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorPeng Qiu
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorYoung C. Jang
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorNick J. Willett
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Department of Orthopedics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Atlanta Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Edward A. Botchwey
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Correspondence
Edward A. Botchwey, Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLauren A. Hymel and Molly E. Ogle are co-first authors.
Funding information: National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Numbers: R56AR071708, GM008433, R01AR071708; National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, Grant/Award Number: DGE-1650044
Abstract
Regeneration of skeletal muscle after volumetric injury is thought to be impaired by a dysregulated immune microenvironment that hinders endogenous repair mechanisms. Such defects result in fatty infiltration, tissue scarring, chronic inflammation, and debilitating functional deficits. Here, we evaluated the key cellular processes driving dysregulation in the injury niche through localized modulation of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor signaling. We employ dimensionality reduction and pseudotime analysis on single cell cytometry data to reveal heterogeneous immune cell subsets infiltrating preclinical muscle defects due to S1P receptor inhibition. We show that global knockout of S1P receptor 3 (S1PR3) is marked by an increase of muscle stem cells within injured tissue, a reduction in classically activated relative to alternatively activated macrophages, and increased bridging of regenerating myofibers across the defect. We found that local S1PR3 antagonism via nanofiber delivery of VPC01091 replicated key features of pseudotime immune cell recruitment dynamics and enhanced regeneration characteristic of global S1PR3 knockout. Our results indicate that local S1P receptor modulation may provide an effective immunotherapy for promoting a proreparative environment leading to improved regeneration following muscle injury.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
jbma37053-sup-0001-FigureS1.tifTIFF image, 9.5 MB | Figure S1 Visualization of circulating immune cell subsets with single cell 2D projections and pseudotime trajectories reveals innate leukocyte heterogeneity. High dimensional flow cytometry data of peripheral blood taken from uninjured animals represented as 2D projections using UMAP and SPADE dimensionality reduction techniques. (A) SPADE trees and accompanying UMAPs generated with manually gated CD11b+ cells circulating homeostatic blood from WT mice (A-I, III) as well as S1PR3 KO (KO) mice (A-II, IV). Within the CD11b+ SPADE trees, neutrophils (A-I, II) and monocytes (A-III, IV) were manually gated and overlaid onto their respective SPADE trees, where the node color represents normalized cell frequency of its specified phenotype in heatmap form. A red overlay on the corresponding UMAPs represent cells identified as a neutrophil or monocyte, respectively. (B) SPADE trees and UMAPS generated with manually gated CD3+ T cells from the blood of uninjured WT mice (B-I, III) and S1PR3 KO mice (B-II, IV). CD4+ T cells (B-I, II) and CD8+ T cells (B-III, IV) were manually gated and overlaid onto the SPADE trees, as well as onto the single cell UMAP projections. UMAP and SPADE representations of high dimensional flow data reveal discrete heterogeneities as observed through the multiple islands depicted on the UMAPs and many nodes clustered via SPADE per phenotypic characterization. n = 3 samples (A) and 7 samples (B) per genotype. |
jbma37053-sup-0002-FigureS2.tifTIFF image, 3 MB | Figure S2 Cell frequency quantifications between WT and S1PR3 KO mice within each SPADE node containing cells of specified phenotype. Bar graph representation and statistical analysis applied to the tornado plots presented in Figure 4. For each specified cellular phenotype, every node containing cells of this particular subset are analyzed for phenotype-specific cell frequency between experimental groups to evaluate which nodes are significantly dominated by subsets from a particular genotype. Nodes containing cells of the respective phenotype are denoted along the x-axis while the phenotype-specific cell frequency is quantified as a percentage of all live cells. Two-way ANOVAs with Tukey's multiple comparisons were performed for statistical analyses with n = 7 samples per genotype. Data is presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 |
jbma37053-sup-0003-FigureS3.tifTIFF image, 15.8 MB | Figure S3 Characterization of VPC01091-loaded nanofiber scaffold. Release of VPC01091 from PLGA-PCL nanofiber scaffolds and biomaterial characterization by atomic force microscopy (AFM). (A) Experimental setup for electrospinning VPC01091-loaded PLGA-PCL nanofibers. (B) VPC01091 in vitro release profile exhibits sustained delivery. (C) Average Young's modulus values obtained via AFM for blank control nanofiber scaffold (NF) and NF loaded with VPC01091 (VPC). (D, G) AFM generated topography (height) map of blank (D) and VPC01091-loaded (G) PLGA-PCL nanofiber scaffold. Height values throughout nanofiber range from low (black) to high (white) regions. (E, H) AFM generated stiffness map of blank (E) and VPC01091-loaded (H) PLGA-PCL nanofiber scaffold in which white regions represent areas of greater stiffness. (F, I) Histogram of Young's modulus values (MPa) obtained from AFM over multiple contact points on blank (F) and VPC01091-loaded (I) PLGA-PCL nanofiber scaffold. Unpaired two-sided t-test was performed for statistical analysis (C) and data is presented as mean ± SEM. |
jbma37053-sup-0004-FigureS4.tifTIFF image, 2.7 MB | Figure S4 Cell frequency quantifications between mice treated with control and VPC01091-loaded nanofibers within each SPADE node containing cells of specified phenotype. Bar graph representation and statistical analysis applied to the tornado plots presented in Figure 5. For each specified cellular phenotype, every node containing cells of this particular subset are analyzed for phenotype-specific cell frequency between experimental groups to evaluate which nodes are significantly dominated by subsets from a particular treatment. Nodes containing cells of the respective phenotype are denoted along the x-axis while the phenotype-specific cell frequency is quantified as a percentage of all live cells. Two-way ANOVAs with Tukey's multiple comparisons were performed for statistical analysis with n = 8 samples per treatment. Data is presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.000. |
jbma37053-sup-0005-FigureS5.tifTIFF image, 6.9 MB | Figure S5 Circulating lymphocytes after muscle injury unaffected by S1PR3 deficiency. SPADE trees generated with CD3+ T cells from the peripheral blood of WT and global S1PR3 KO mice (A-C) and mice treated with blank control nanofibers (NF) and those releasing VPC01091 (D-F) 3 days post VML injury. (A, D) CD4+ (I) and CD8+ (II) T cells were manually gated and overlaid onto their respective SPADE trees where colored node annotation represents normalized cell frequency in the form of a heatmap, illustrating the phenotypic differences in these T cell subpopulations as they are located on opposing sides of the tree. (B, E) CD4 (I) and CD8 (II) fluorescence marker intensities overlaid onto the SPADE trees with the manually gated annotation circled in black to further characterize their expression as displayed by SPADE clustering. (C, F) SPADE quantifications of total CD4+ and CD8+ T cells circulating the blood of WT versus S1PR3 KO mice (C) and mice treated with blank control or VPC01091-loaded (VPC) nanofibers (F). Data represented as mean ± SEM using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. n = 7 samples per experimental group. |
jbma37053-sup-0006-FigureS6.tifTIFF image, 7.5 MB | Figure S6 Lack of S1PR3 leads to increased numbers of muscle resident stem cells. SPADE trees generated from Lin− cell events taken from uninjured spinotrapezius and hindlimb muscles. (A) MuSCs from the spinotrapezius (A-I) and hindlimb (A-II) are manually gated and overlaid onto their respective trees, annotated with colored nodes representing normalized cell frequency and displayed as a heatmap on the tree. Each node containing MuSCs is given a node assignment number as given next to each colored node. (B) MuSC frequency within each node annotated on spinotrapezius and hindlimb derived SPADE trees. Nodes from the SPADE tree generated with Lin− spinotrapezius derived cells are quantified for MuSC frequency (B-I) while those derived from the hindlimb are quantified by node in (B-II). (C) Tornado plot representation of the difference in average MuSC frequency percentage between S1PR3 deficient mice and their WT counterparts shows that nodes containing MuSCs largely contain those derived from mice lacking S1PR3 (KO) in both the spinotrapezius and hindlimb (C-I, II). Two-way ANOVAs with Tukey's multiple comparisons were conducted for statistical analyses and data is presented as mean ± SEM with n = 3 per genotype for hindlimb samples and an n = 4 per genotype for spinotrapezius samples. *p < 0.05 |
jbma37053-sup-0007-FigureS7.tifTIFF image, 473.4 KB | Figure S7 Treatment with blank nanofiber scaffold increases macrophage infiltration to defect area 3 days post injury. Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b+CD64+MerTK+ macrophages in injured spinotrapezius muscle 3 days post injury between WT mice receiving no treatment (injury control, black bar) and WT mice treated with blank nanofiber scaffolds (white bar). Statistical analysis performed with two-tailed t-test. Data presented as mean ± SEM. n = 7 for WT injury control and n = 8 for mice treated with blank nanofibers. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Anchang, B., Hart, T. D., Bendall, S. C., Qiu, P., Bjornson, Z., Linderman, M., … Plevritis, S. K. (2016). Visualization and cellular hierarchy inference of single-cell data using SPADE. Nature Protocols, 11(7), 1264–1279. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.066
- Anderson, S. E., Han, W. M., Srinivasa, V., Mohiuddin, M., Ruehle, M. A., Moon, J. Y., … Jang, Y. C. (2019). Determination of a critical size threshold for volumetric muscle loss in the mouse quadriceps. Tissue Engineering. Part C: Methods, 25(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2018.0324
- Arnold, L., Henry, A., Poron, F., Baba-Amer, Y., van Rooijen, N., Plonquet, A., … Chazaud, B. (2007). Inflammatory monocytes recruited after skeletal muscle injury switch into antiinflammatory macrophages to support myogenesis. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 204(5), 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20070075
- Awojoodu, A. O., Ogle, M. E., Sefcik, L. S., Bowers, D. T., Martin, K., Brayman, K. L., … Botchwey, E. (2013). Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 3 regulates recruitment of anti-inflammatory monocytes to microvessels during implant arteriogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(34), 13785–13790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221309110
- Banerjee, M., Bouillon, B., Shafizadeh, S., Paffrath, T., Lefering, R., Wafaisade, A., & German Trauma Registry. (2013). Epidemiology of extremity injuries in multiple trauma patients. Injury, 44(8), 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.007
- Becht, E., McInnes, L., Healy, J., Dutertre, C. A., IWH, K., Ng, L. G., … Newell, E. W. (2019). Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nature Biotechnology, 37, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4314
- Brown, B. N., Ratner, B. D., Goodman, S. B., Amar, S., & Badylak, S. F. (2012). Macrophage polarization: An opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials, 33(15), 3792–3802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.034
- Cencetti, F., Bernacchioni, C., Nincheri, P., Donati, C., & Bruni, P. (2010). Transforming growth factor-beta1 induces transdifferentiation of myoblasts into myofibroblasts via up-regulation of sphingosine kinase-1/S1P3 axis. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 21(6), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-09-0812
- Corona, B. T., Rivera, J. C., Owens, J. G., Wenke, J. C., & Rathbone, C. R. (2015). Volumetric muscle loss leads to permanent disability following extremity trauma. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 52(7), 785–792. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.07.0165
- Das, A., Segar, C. E., Hughley, B. B., Bowers, D. T., & Botchwey, E. A. (2013). The promotion of mandibular defect healing by the targeting of S1P receptors and the recruitment of alternatively activated macrophages. Biomaterials, 34(38), 9853–9862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.015
- Deng, B., Wehling-Henricks, M., Villalta, S. A., Wang, Y., & Tidball, J. G. (2012). IL-10 triggers changes in macrophage phenotype that promote muscle growth and regeneration. Journal of Immunology, 189(7), 3669–3680. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1103180
- Donati, C., Cencetti, F., & Bruni, P. (2013). Sphingosine 1-phosphate axis: A new leader actor in skeletal muscle biology. Frontiers in Physiology, 4, 338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00338
- Dougherty, A. L., Mohrle, C. R., Galarneau, M. R., Woodruff, S. I., Dye, J. L., & Quinn, K. H. (2009). Battlefield extremity injuries in operation Iraqi freedom. Injury, 40(7), 772–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.02.014
- Dziki, J. L., Sicari, B. M., Wolf, M. T., Cramer, M. C., & Badylak, S. F. (2016). Immunomodulation and mobilization of progenitor cells by extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for volumetric muscle loss treatment. Tissue Engineering. Part A, 22(19–20), 1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0340
- Emeterio, C. L. S., Olingy, C. E., Chu, Y., & Botchwey, E. A. (2017). Selective recruitment of non-classical monocytes promotes skeletal muscle repair. Biomaterials, 117, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.021
- Fortier, M., Figeac, N., White, R. B., Knopp, P., & Zammit, P. S. (2013). Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 3 influences cell cycle progression in muscle satellite cells. Developmental Biology, 382(2), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.07.006
- Garg, K., Ward, C. L., Hurtgen, B. J., Wilken, J. M., Stinner, D. J., Wenke, J. C., … Corona, B. T. (2015). Volumetric muscle loss: Persistent functional deficits beyond frank loss of tissue. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 33(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22730
- Geissmann, F., Jung, S., & Littman, D. R. (2003). Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity, 19(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00174-2
- Gibbons, M. A., MacKinnon, A. C., Ramachandran, P., Dhaliwal, K., Duffin, R., Phythian-Adams, A. T., … Forbes, S. J. (2011). Ly6Chi monocytes direct alternatively activated profibrotic macrophage regulation of lung fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 184(5), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201010-1719OC
- Gosselin, D., Link, V. M., Romanoski, C. E., Fonseca, G. J., Eichenfield, D. Z., Spann, N. J., … Glass, C. K. (2014). Environment drives selection and function of enhancers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities. Cell, 159(6), 1327–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.023
- Hardy, D., Besnard, A., Latil, M., Jouvion, G., Briand, D., Thepenier, C., … Chretien, F. (2016). Comparative study of injury models for studying muscle regeneration in mice. PLoS One, 11(1), e0147198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147198
- Hsu, J. R., & Grogan, B. F. (2011). Volumetric muscle loss. Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium [Internet], 19, S35–S37.
- Hughes, J. E., Srinivasan, S., Lynch, K. R., Proia, R. L., Ferdek, P., & Hedrick, C. C. (2008). Sphingosine-1-phosphate induces an antiinflammatory phenotype in macrophages. Circulation Research, 102(8), 950–958. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.170779
- Hurtgen, B. J., Ward, C. L., Garg, K., Pollot, B. E., Goldman, S. M., McKinley, T. O., … Corona, B. T. (2016). Severe muscle trauma triggers heightened and prolonged local musculoskeletal inflammation and impairs adjacent tibia fracture healing. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions, 16(2), 122–134.
- Hutter, J. L., & Bechhoefer, J. (1993). Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Review of Scientific Instruments, 64(7), 1868–1873. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1143970
- Jiang, T., Carbone, E. J., Lo, K. W. H., & Laurencin, C. T. (2015). Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers for tissue regeneration. Progress in Polymer Science, 46, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.12.001
- Kyba, M. (2016). Skeletal muscle regeneration in the mouse: Methods and protocols preface. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1460, V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3810-0
- Luo, B., Gan, W., Liu, Z., Shen, Z., Wang, J., Shi, R., … Wu, Y. (2016). Erythropoeitin signaling in macrophages promotes dying cell clearance and immune tolerance. Immunity, 44(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.002
- Ogle, M. E., Sefcik, L. S., Awojoodu, A. O., Chiappa, N. F., Lynch, K., Peirce-Cottler, S., & Botchwey, E. A. (2014). Engineering in vivo gradients of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor ligands for localized microvascular remodeling and inflammatory cell positioning. Acta Biomaterialia, 10(11), 4704–4714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.007
- Ogle, M. E., Segar, C. E., Sridhar, S., & Botchwey, E. A. (2016). Monocytes and macrophages in tissue repair: Implications for immunoregenerative biomaterial design. Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood), 241(10), 1084–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370216650293
- Olingy, C. E., San Emeterio, C. L., Ogle, M. E., Krieger, J. R., Bruce, A. C., Pfau, D. D., … Botchwey, E. A. (2017). Non-classical monocytes are biased progenitors of wound healing macrophages during soft tissue injury. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00477-1
- Owens, B. D., Kragh, J. F., Jr., Wenke, J. C., Macaitis, J., Wade, C. E., & Holcomb, J. B. (2008). Combat wounds in operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom. The Journal of Trauma, 64(2), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318163b875
- Roman, W., & Gomes, E. R. (2018). Nuclear positioning in skeletal muscle. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 82, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.005
- Sassoli, C., Pierucci, F., Zecchi-Orlandini, S., & Meacci, E. (2019). Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptor signaling and mechanotransduction: Implications for intrinsic tissue repair/regeneration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(22), 5545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20225545
- Schiaffino, S., Rossi, A. C., Smerdu, V., Leinwand, L. A., & Reggiani, C. (2015). Developmental myosins: Expression patterns and functional significance. Skeletal Muscle, 5, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-015-0046-6
- Sefcik, L. S., Aronin, C. E. P., Awojoodu, A. O., Shin, S. J., Gabhann, F. M., MacDonald, T. L., … Botchwey, E. A. (2011). Selective activation of Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors 1 and 3 promotes local microvascular network growth. Tissue Engineering. Part A, 17(5–6), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0404
- Sefcik, L. S., Petrie Aronin, C. E., Wieghaus, K. A., & Botchwey, E. A. (2008). Sustained release of sphingosine 1-phosphate for therapeutic arteriogenesis and bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 29(19), 2869–2877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.017
- Shen, W., Li, Y., Zhu, J. H., Schwendener, R., & Huard, J. (2008). Interaction between macrophages, TGF-beta 1, and the COX-2 pathway during the inflammatory phase of skeletal muscle healing after injury. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 214(2), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21212
- Soehnlein, O., & Lindbom, L. (2010). Phagocyte partnership during the onset and resolution of inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology, 10(6), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2779
- Sok, M. C. P., Tria, M. C., Olingy, C. E., San Emeterio, C. L., & Botchwey, E. A. (2017). Aspirin-triggered Resolvin D1-modified materials promote the accumulation of pro-regenerative immune cell subsets and enhance vascular remodeling. Acta Biomaterialia, 53, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.020
- Sommerfeld, S. D., Cherry, C., Schwab, R. M., Chung, L., Maestas, D. R., Jr., Laffont, P., … Elisseeff, J. H. (2019). Interleukin-36gamma-producing macrophages drive IL-17-mediated fibrosis. Science Immunology, 4(40). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aax4783
- Spiller, K. L., Anfang, R. R., Spiller, K. J., Ng, J., Nakazawa, K. R., Daulton, J. W., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2014). The role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials, 35(15), 4477–4488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.012
- Tonkin, J., Temmerman, L., Sampson, R. D., Gallego-Colon, E., Barberi, L., Bilbao, D., … Rosenthal, N. (2015). Monocyte/macrophage-derived IGF-1 orchestrates murine skeletal muscle regeneration and modulates autocrine polarization. Molecular Therapy, 23(7), 1189–1200. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2015.66
- Trapnell, C., Cacchiarelli, D., Grimsby, J., Pokharel, P., Li, S., Morse, M., … Rinn, J. L. (2014). The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nature Biotechnology, 32(4), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2859
- Wang, Y., Wehling-Henricks, M., Samengo, G., & Tidball, J. G. (2015). Increases of M2a macrophages and fibrosis in aging muscle are influenced by bone marrow aging and negatively regulated by muscle-derived nitric oxide. Aging Cell, 14(4), 678–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12350
- Weigert, A., Weis, N., & Brune, B. (2009). Regulation of macrophage function by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Immunobiology, 214(9–10), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2009.06.003
- Wosczyna, M. N., & Rando, T. A. A. (2018). Muscle stem cell support group: Coordinated cellular responses in muscle regeneration. Developmental Cell, 46(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.06.018
- Wynn, T. A., & Vannella, K. M. (2016). Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity, 44(3), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015
- Xiao, W. H., Liu, Y., & Chen, P. J. (2016). Macrophage depletion impairs skeletal muscle regeneration: The roles of pro-fibrotic factors, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Inflammation, 39(6), 2016–2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-016-0438-8
- Yang, J., Yang, L., Tian, L., Ji, X., Yang, L., & Li, L. (2018). Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptor2/3 Axis promotes inflammatory M1 polarization of bone marrow-derived monocyte/macrophage via G(alpha)i/o/PI3K/JNK pathway. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, 49(5), 1677–1693. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493611