Replication
Comparison of synchronous reinforcement and accumulated reinforcement for increasing on-task behavior in preschoolers
Sara C. Diaz de Villegas,
Claudia L. Dozier,
Ky C. Kanaman,
Stacha C. Leslie,
Marissa E. Kamlowsky,
Corresponding Author
Sara C. Diaz de Villegas
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Correspondence
Sara C. Diaz de Villegas, Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorClaudia L. Dozier
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorKy C. Kanaman
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorStacha C. Leslie
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarissa E. Kamlowsky
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSara C. Diaz de Villegas,
Claudia L. Dozier,
Ky C. Kanaman,
Stacha C. Leslie,
Marissa E. Kamlowsky,
Corresponding Author
Sara C. Diaz de Villegas
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Correspondence
Sara C. Diaz de Villegas, Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorClaudia L. Dozier
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorKy C. Kanaman
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorStacha C. Leslie
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarissa E. Kamlowsky
Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorEditor-in-Chief: John Borrero
Handling Editor: Jeanne Donaldson
Abstract
In synchronous-reinforcement schedules, the duration of behavior directly controls the duration of reinforcement on a moment-to-moment basis. We replicated and extended Diaz de Villegas et al. (2020) by comparing the effects of synchronous reinforcement with two accumulated-reinforcement schedules for increasing on-task behavior for seven preschoolers. One accumulated schedule was the same as the one used in Diaz de Villegas et al. and did not include tokens, whereas the other accumulated schedule included the delivery of tokens within session. Furthermore, we assessed preference for the three reinforcement schedules. The results showed that synchronous reinforcement was effective for increasing on-task behavior for all seven participants. Furthermore, it was most effective for increasing on-task behavior for three out of seven participants and preferred by all participants. For some participants, other schedules were also similarly effective. The results are discussed with respect to implications for application.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose regarding the current manuscript.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Supporting Information includes additional data summarizing within-session analyses: specifically, within-session analyses of response-pausing duration and instances, background probability of pausing, conditional probability of pausing in the accumulated-token condition, and analysis of bouts of responding.
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| jaba1080-sup-0001-Supinfo.docxWord 2007 document , 23.6 KB | Data S1: Supporting Information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Biddiss, E., & Irwin, J. (2010). Active video games to promote physical activity in children and youth. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(7), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.104
- Carr, E. G., Newsom, C. D., & Binkoff, J. A. (1980). Escape as a factor in the aggressive behavior of two retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1980.13-101
- Craig, A. R., Lattal, K. A., & Hall, E. G. (2014). Pausing as an operant: Choice and discriminated responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.73
- DeLeon, I. G., Chase, J. A., Frank-Crawford, M. A., Carreau-Webster, A. B., Triggs, M. M., Bullock, C. E., & Jennett, H. K. (2014). Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: Evaluations of efficacy and preference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(2), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.116
- Diaz de Villegas, S. C., Dozier, C. L., Jess, R. L., & Foley, E. A. (2020). An evaluation of synchronous reinforcement for increasing on-task behavior in preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1660–1673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.696
- Faith, M. S., Berman, N., Heo, M., Pietrobelli, A., Gallagher, D., Epstein, L. H., Eiden, M. T., & Allison, D. B. (2001). Effects of contingent television on physical activity and television viewing in obese children. Pediatrics, 107(5), 1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.5.1043
- Fernandez, N., Argueta, T., & DeLeon, I. G. (2023). Common practices used to establish and implement token economies in clinical and instructional settings: A survey of BACB certificants. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 16(4), 1151–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00800-5
- Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/10627-000
- Fienup, D. M., Ahlers, A. A., & Pace, G. (2011). Preference for fluent versus disfluent work schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-847
- Frank-Crawford, M. A., Borrero, J. C., Newcomb, E. T., Chen, T., & Schmidt, J. D. (2019). Preference for and efficacy of accumulated and distributed response-reinforcer arrangements during skill acquisition. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(2), 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-09312-7
- Frank-Crawford, M. A., Borrero, J. C., Nguyen, L., Leon-Enriquez, Yanerys, & DeLeon, I. G. (2012). Disruptive effects of contingent food on high-probability behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(1), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-143
- Friedlander, B. Z. (1966). Three manipulanda for the study of human infants' operant play. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9(1), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1966.9-47
- Green, L., & Freed, D. E. (1993). The substitutability of reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-141
- Hackenberg, T. D. (2009). Token reinforcement: A review and analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91(2), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2009.91-257
- Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., & Maglieri, K. A. (2005). On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2005.6-04
- Hardesty, E. M., Lerman, D. C., & Hardee, J. L. (2023). A comparison of synchronous and noncontingent stimulus delivery on task engagement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 56(3), 664–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.986
- Herrnstein, R. J. (1964). Secondary reinforcement and rate of primary reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27
- Horowitz, F. D. (1974a). Infant attention and discrimination: Methodological and substantive issues. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 39(5/6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165968
- Horowitz, F. D. (1974b). Discussion and conclusions. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 39(5/6), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165976
- Hume, K. M., & Crossman, J. (1992). Musical reinforcement of practice behaviors among competitive swimmers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(3), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-665
- Kazdin, A. E. (1982). The token economy: A decade later. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1982.15-431
- Kiss, L., & Linnell, K. J. (2021). The effect of preferred background music on task-focus in sustained attention. Psychological Research, 85(6), 2313–2325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01400-6
- Lalli, J. S., Vollmer, T. R., Progar, P. R., Wright, C., Borrero, J., Daniel, D., Hoffner Barthold, C., Tocco, K., & May, W. (1999). Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1999.32-285
- Lattal, K. A. (2010). Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.93-129
- Lattal, K. A., & Gleeson, S. (1990). Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.16.1.27
- Lattal, K. A., & Neef, N. A. (1996). Recent reinforcement-schedule research and applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-213
- Lerman, D. C., Iwata, B. A., Shore, B. A., & Kahng, S. W. (1996). Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement: Implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-153
- Leuba, C., & Friedlander, B. Z. (1968). Effects of controlled audio-visual reinforcement on infants' manipulative play in the home. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(68)90074-X
- Lomas, J. E., Fisher, W. W., & Kelley, M. E. (2010). The effects of variable-time delivery of food items and praise on problem behavior reinforced by escape. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-425
- Mace, F. C., Pritchard, D., & Penney, Heather. (2021). Schedules of reinforcement. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roan (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis ( 2nd ed., pp. 58–77). The Guildford Press.
- McHugh, C. L., Dozier, C. L., Diaz de Villegas, S. C., & Kanaman, N. A. (2022). Using synchronous reinforcement to increase mask wearing in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 55(4), 1157–1171. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.950
- Miltenberger, R. G. (2016). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures ( 6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Morgan, D. L. (2010). Schedules of reinforcement at 50: A retrospective appreciation. The Psychological Record, 60(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395699
- Pelaez-Nogueras, M., Field, T., Gewirtz, J. L., Cigales, M., Gonzalez, A., Sanchez, A., & Richardson, S. C. (1997). The effect of systematic stroking versus tickling and poking on infant behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(97)90034-4
- Pelaez-Nogueras, M., Gewirtz, J. L., Field, T., Cigales, M., Malphurs, J., Clasky, S., & Sanchez, A. (1996). Infants' preference for touch stimulation in face-to-face interactions. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(96)90025-8
- Pitts, R. C. (2014). Reconsidering the concept of behavioral mechanisms of drug action. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(3), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.80
- Ramey, C. T., Hieger, L., & Klisz, D. (1972). Synchronous reinforcement of vocal responses in failure-to-thrive infants. Child Development, 43(4), 1449–1455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127533
- Reed, D. D., Niileksela, C. R., & Kaplan, B. A. (2013). Behavioral economics. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391790
- Rovee-Collier, C. K., & Gekoski, M. J. (1979). The economics of infancy: A review of conjugate reinforcement. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 13, 195–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60348-1
- Saunders, M. D., Questad, K. A., Kedziorski, T. L., Boase, B. C., Patterson, E. A., & Cullinan, T. B. (2001). Unprompted mechanical switch use in individuals with severe multiple disabilities: An evaluation of the effects of body position. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026505332347
- Saunders, M. D., & Saunders, R. R. (2011). Innovation of a reinforcer preference assessment with the difficult to test. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1572–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.049
- Saunders, M. D., Timler, G. R., Cullinan, T. B., Pilkey, S., Questad, K. A., & Saunders, R. R. (2003). Evidence of contingency awareness in people with profound multiple impairments: Response duration versus response rate indicators. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24(4), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(03)00040-4
- Siqueland, E. R. (1968). Reinforcement patterns and extinction in human newborns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(68)90124-0
- Siqueland, E. R., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1966). Conditioned head-turning in human newborns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3(4), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(66)90080-4
- Smith, K. U., Zwerg, C., & Smith, N. J. (1963). Sensory-feedback analysis of infant control of the behavioral environment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 16(3), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1963.16.3.725
- Striefel, S., & Smeets, P. M. (1974). TV preference as a technique for selection of reinforcers. Psychological Reports, 35(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1974.35.1.107
- Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., & Wright, C. S., Van Camp, C., & Lalli, J. S. (2001). Identifying possible contingencies during descriptive analyses of severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2001.34-269
- Wallace, M. D., Iwata, B. A., Hanley, G. P., Thompson, R. H., & Roscoe, E. M. (2012). Noncontingent reinforcement: A further examination of schedule effects during treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(4), 709–719. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-709
- Ward-Horner, J. C., Cengher, M., Ross, R. K., & Fienup, D. M. (2017). Arranging response requirements and the distribution of reinforcers: A brief review of preference and performance outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(1), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.350
- Ward-Horner, J. C., Pittenger, A., Pace, G., & Fienup, D. M. (2014). Effects of reinforcer magnitude and distribution on preference for work schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(3), 623–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.133
- Weisberg, P., & Rovee-Collier, C. (1998). Behavioral process of infants and young children. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 325–370). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1947-2
10.1007/978-1-4899-1947-2_11 Google Scholar
- Williams, B. A. (1976). The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26(3), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1976.26-441
- Williams, D. C., & Johnston, J. M. (1992). Continuous versus discrete dimensions of reinforcement schedules: An integrative analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58(1), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1992.58-205
