SYNTHESIZING FRAMEWORKS OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
Meghan Brenneman
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorTeresa Jackson
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorJeremy Burrus
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorSteven Robbins
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorMeghan Brenneman
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorTeresa Jackson
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorJeremy Burrus
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorSteven Robbins
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
The public, education, and workforce sectors all have expressed interest regarding the key knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable individuals to be productive members of society. Although past efforts have attempted to create frameworks of student learning outcomes, the results have varied due to different perspectives and goals. Thus, the purpose of this paper was to gather and review relevant higher education frameworks, determine their commonalities and create domains, and identify the assessments that Educational Testing Service (ETS) has developed in each of the domains. After a thorough review of the relevant frameworks, seven key domains were identified: creativity, critical thinking, teamwork, communication, digital and information literacy, citizenship, and life skills. Also discussed were the issues of education versus work contextualization and the assumption of foundational quantitative reasoning and literacy skills informing these seven domains.
REFERENCES
- Adelman, C. (2009). The Bologna process for U.S. eyes: Re-learning higher education in the age of convergence. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
- Adelman, C., Ewell, P., Gaston, P., & Schneider, C. G. (2011). The degree qualifications profile. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation.
- Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (2012a). Our global team. Retrieved from http://atc21s.org/index.php/about/team/
- Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (2012b). Timeline. Retrieved from http://atc21s.org/index.php/about/timeline/
- Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: Author.
- Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2010). The quality imperative: Match ambitious goals for college attainment with an ambitious vision for learning. Washington, DC: Author.
- Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2011). The LEAP vision for learning: Outcomes, practices, impact, and employers' views. Washington, DC: Author.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Bennett, R. E., & Rock, D. A. (1995). Generalizability, validity, and examinee perceptions of a computer-delivered formulating-hypotheses test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 19–36.
- Bennett, R. E., & Rock, D. A. (1998). Examining the validity of a computer-based generating-explanations test in an operational setting (Research Report No. RR-97-18). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
- Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., & Ripley, M. (with Rumble, M.). (2009). Defining 21st century skills (White Paper 1). Retrieved from http://atc21s.org/index.php/resources/white-papers/
- Burrus, J., Jackson, T., Xi, N., & Steinberg, J. (2013). Identifying the most important 21st century workforce competencies: An analysis of the Occupational Information Network (O*NET (Research Report No. RR-13-21). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
- Carnevale, A. P., Rose, S. J., & Hanson, A. R. (2012). Certificates: Gateway to gainful employment and college degrees. Washington, DC: Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce.
- Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
- Chickering, A.W. (1999). Personal qualities and human development in higher education: Assessment in the service of educational goals. In S. J. Messick (Ed.), Assessment in higher education (pp. 13–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., & Stephens, J. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing America's undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Coley, R. J., & Sum, A. M. (2012). Fault lines in our democracy: Civic knowledge, voting behavior, and civic engagement in the United States (Policy Information Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
- Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. (n.d.). CAS general standards 2012. Retrieved from http://www.cas.edu/getpdf.cfm?PDF‘E864D2C4-D655-8F74-2E647CDECD29B7D0
- Curtis-Tweed, P. (2004). Moral and civic responsibility and the commercialization of higher education. Journal of Moral Education, 33, 211–217.
- da Silva, L., Sanson, A., Smart, D., & Toumbourou, J. (2004). Civic responsibility among Australian adolescents: Testing two competing models. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 229–255.
- Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society: The report of the National Committee of Inquiry Into Higher Education (the Dearing report). London, UK: The Stationery Office.
- Deloitte, & The Manufacturing Institute. (2011). Boiling point? The skills gap in U.S. manufacturing. Retrieved from http://www.themanufacturinginstitute.org/~/media/A07730B2A798437D98501E798C2E13AA.ashx
- Education, Audiovisual, and Cultural Executive Agency. (2012). The European higher education area in 2012: Bologna process and implementation report. Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/(1)/Bologna%20Process%20Implementation%20Report.pdf
- Educational Testing Service. (2010). ETS® Proficiency Profile user's guide. Princeton, NJ: Author.
- Educational Testing Service. (2013). Introduction to the analytical writing measure. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/gre/revised_general/prepare/analytical_writing
- Ennis, M. R. (2008). Competency models: A review of the literature and the role of the Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
- Frederiksen, N. (1959). Development of the test “formulating hypotheses”: A progress report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
- Frederiksen, N., & Evans, F. R. (1974). Effects of models of creative performance on ability to formulate hypotheses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 67–82.
- Frederiksen, N., & Ward, W. C. (1978). Measures for the study of creativity in scientific problem-solving. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(1), 1–24.
10.1177/014662167800200101 Google Scholar
- J. González, & R. Wagenaar (Eds.).(2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe: Final report phase 1. Bilbao, Spain: Universidad de Deusto.
- Hart Research Associates. (2010). Raising the bar: Employers' views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn. Washington, DC: Author.
- Knapp, L. G., Kelly-Reid, J. E., & Ginder, S. A. (2012). Enrollment in postsecondary institutions, Fall 2011; financial statistics, fiscal year 2011; and graduation rates, selected cohorts, 2003–2008: First look (provisional data) (NCES 2012–174rev). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
- Kyllonen, P. C. (2012, May). Measurement of 21st century skills within the Common Core State Standards. Paper presented at the Invitational Research Symposium on Technology Enhanced Assessments (TEA), Washington, DC.
- Liu, O. L., Rijmen, F., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). The assessment of time management in middle school students. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 174–179.
- Lokhoff, J., Wegewijs, B., Durkin, K., Wagenaar, R., Gonzalez, J., Isaacs, A. K., … Gobbi, M. (2010). A guide to formulating degree programme profiles including programme competences and programme learning outcomes. Spain: Universidad de Deusto.
- Lumina Foundation. (2012). Lumina Foundation fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.luminafoundation.org/publications/Lumina-Fact_Sheet.pdf
- ManpowerGroup. (2012). Talent shortage survey: Research results. Retrieved from http://www.manpowergroup.us/campaigns/talent-shortage-2012/pdf/2012_Talent_Shortage_Survey_Results_US_FINALFINAL.pdf
- Manyika, J., Lund, S., Auguste, B., Mendonca, L., Welsh, T., & Ramaswamy, S. (2011). An economy that works: Job creation and America's future. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/MGI/Research/Labor_Markets/An_economy_that_works_for_US_job_creation
- Marshall, D. W., Kalina, M., & Dane, W. (2010). Tuning educational structures: A guide to the process (version 1.0). Retrieved from http://www.tuningusa.org/TuningUSA/tuningusa.publicwebsite/b7/b70c4e0d-30d5–4d0d-ba75-e29c52c11815.pdf
- McPherson, P., & Shulenburger, D. (2006). Toward a voluntary system of accountability program (VSA) for public universities and colleges. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
- Miller, M. A. (2008, July/August). The voluntary system of accountability: Origins and purposes. Change: The Magazine of Learning, 40(4), 8–13.
10.3200/CHNG.40.4.8-13 Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2008). Research on future skills demands: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2010). Exploring the intersection of science education and 21st century skills: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2011). Assessing 21st century skills: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
- Quality Assurance Agency. (2008). The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: August 2008. Mansfield, UK: Author.
- Rhodes, T. (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using rubrics. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
- Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
- Robbins, S., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288.
- Robbins, S. B., Oh, I. S., Le, H., & Button, C. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1163–1184.
- Shultz, M., & Zedeck, S. (2012). Admission to law school: New measures. Educational Psychologist, 47(1), 51–65.
- Stemler, S. E. (2012). What should university admissions tests predict? Educational Psychologist, 47(1), 5–17.
- Strayhorn, T. L. (2006). Frameworks for assessing learning and development outcomes. Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education
- Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. (n.d.). What is tuning? Retrieved from http://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/
- U.S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
- U.S. Department of Labor. Employment and Training Administration. (n.d.). Building blocks for competency models. Retrieved from http://www.melvinhenry.org/generic-model.pdf
- Wang, L., MacCann, C., Zhuang, X., Liu, O. L., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). Assessing teamwork and collaboration in high school students: A multi-method approach. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24(2), 108–124.
10.1177/0829573509335470 Google Scholar