Volume 24, Issue 2 pp. 204-211
Full Access

Computer-Based Accountability: Implications for Training

DONA ALPERT

DONA ALPERT

Assistant professor

Dona Alpert is an assistant professor

Search for more papers by this author
CHARLES J. PULVINO

CHARLES J. PULVINO

Professors

Charles J. Pulvino and James L. Lee are professors, Department of Counseling and Guidance, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Technical inquiries about the Counselor Accountability System should be directed to Instructional Enterprises, Box 55064, Madison, WI 53705.

Search for more papers by this author
JAMES L. LEE

JAMES L. LEE

Professors

Charles J. Pulvino and James L. Lee are professors, Department of Counseling and Guidance, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Technical inquiries about the Counselor Accountability System should be directed to Instructional Enterprises, Box 55064, Madison, WI 53705.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: December 1984
Citations: 4

Abstract

Since the call for professional accountability in the early 1970s, counselors and counselor educators have attempted to assess counseling effectiveness, to upgrade programs as a result of assessments, and to communicate results of program assessment and change to their publics. Until recently, their efforts have been impeded by the interpersonal nature of counseling, insufficient training in research and evaluation, and available low-cost computer technology. This article addresses each of the impediments with the focus on how present computer technology, specifically computer-assisted systems, can be used to help counselors and counselor educators ethically input, store, and retrieve pertinent client and program data—data that can be used to achieve program evaluation and lead to accountable program development. The Counselor Accountability System is presented as an example of an easy-to-use computer program designed to facilitate counselor accountability.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.