Volume 27, Issue 1 pp. 17-22
Original Articles

Proabsorptive Effects of Modified Tapioca Starch as an Additive of Oral Rehydration Solutions

Raul A. Wapnir

Corresponding Author

Raul A. Wapnir

Departments of Pediatrics and Laboratories, North Shore University Hospital-New York University School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York, U.S.A.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R. A. Wapnir, Department of Pediatrics, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY 11030, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
Mark A. Wingertzahn

Mark A. Wingertzahn

Departments of Pediatrics and Laboratories, North Shore University Hospital-New York University School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Moyse

Jeffrey Moyse

Departments of Pediatrics and Laboratories, North Shore University Hospital-New York University School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Saul Teichberg

Saul Teichberg

Departments of Pediatrics and Laboratories, North Shore University Hospital-New York University School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 July 1998
Citations: 2

Submitted May 23, 1997

This article is accompanied by an editorial. Please see: Rhoads JM. Oral rehydration pudding? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998;27:114-115.

ABSTRACT

Background:

Partially hydrolyzed starches from staple cereals, obtained by heat or by enzymatic treatment, are often used in the formulation of homemade or extemporaneously used oral rehydration solutions used in developing countries. Conflicting or anecdotal results obtained thus far could be clarified with a standardized preparation tested under well-controlled laboratory conditions.

Methods:

A modified commercial tapioca starch was tested. Textra (National Starch and Chemical Co. Bridgewater, NJ, U.S.A.) added at 0, 5 or 10 g/l to an oral rehydration solution with 90 mM sodium and 111 mM glucose, in 30 rats malnourished by a protein-deficient diet for 3 weeks and in 26 well-fed control animals, using a one-pass jejunal perfusion.

Results:

In protein-deficient rats, Textra stimulated sodium absorption at 5 and 10 g/l (mean ± SEM); 0 g/l Textra: 160 ± 13 nmol/min × cm; 5 g/l Textra: 406 ± 31 (p < 0.0001); and 10 g/l Textra 230 ± 27 (p < 0.02). Potassium absorption was comparably increased. Textra also improved net water absorption and the water influx:efflux ratio. Glucose absorption was increased only at 10 g/l Textra. In control rats, Textra improved sodium and net water absorption at 5 g/l, but not at 10 g/l Textra; but the influx:efflux ratio and potassium absorption were unaltered.

Conclusions:

These data, obtained in normal and protein-deficient rats, support the view that modified starch is a potentially useful, energy-rich additive for oral rehydration solution, which does not introduce an osmotic penalty.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.