Volume 146, Issue 9 pp. 2628-2635
Tumor Markers and Signatures

Mutational analysis of cervical cytology improves diagnosis of endometrial cancer: A prospective multicentre cohort study

Casper Reijnen

Corresponding Author

Casper Reijnen

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Casper Reijnen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Tel.: +31653423862, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Louis J.M. van der Putten

Louis J.M. van der Putten

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Johan Bulten

Johan Bulten

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Marc P.L.M. Snijders

Marc P.L.M. Snijders

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Heidi V.N. Küsters-Vandevelde

Heidi V.N. Küsters-Vandevelde

Department of Pathology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Sanne Sweegers

Sanne Sweegers

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Maria C. Vos

Maria C. Vos

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Anneke A.M. van der Wurff

Anneke A.M. van der Wurff

Department of Pathology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Marjolijn J.L. Ligtenberg

Marjolijn J.L. Ligtenberg

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Leon F.A.G. Massuger

Leon F.A.G. Massuger

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Astrid Eijkelenboom

Astrid Eijkelenboom

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg

Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 September 2019
Citations: 21
Conflict of interest: M.L.: advisory board AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche; sponsored research by AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Illumina; royalties by Nimagen. Furthermore, no competing interests were declared.

Abstract

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is traditionally diagnosed by a histopathological assessment of an endometrial biopsy, leaving up to 30% of patients undiagnosed due to technical failure or an inadequate amount of tissue. The aim of the current study is to assess whether mutational analysis of cervical cytology or pipelle endometrial biopsies improves the diagnostic accuracy of traditional histopathological diagnosis of EC. This prospective multicentre cohort study included patients surgically treated for EC or a benign gynaecological condition (control group). A Pap brush sample, cervicovaginal self-sample, pipelle endometrial biopsy and surgical specimen of either the EC or normal endometrium were obtained. A targeted next-generation sequencing panel was used to analyse these samples for mutations in eight genes. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated. Fifty-nine EC patients and 31 control patients were included. In these patients, traditional histopathological diagnosis by pipelle had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 100%. For EC patients, 97% of surgical specimens contained at least one mutation. Mutational analysis of Pap brush samples, self-samples and pipelle endometrial biopsies yielded a sensitivity of 78, 67 and 96% with a specificity of 97, 97 and 94%, respectively. Combining one of these three methods with histopathological pipelle endometrial biopsy evaluations yielded a sensitivity of 96, 93 and 96%, respectively. Our study has shown that mutational analysis of either cervical cytology or pipelle endometrial biopsies improves diagnosis of EC. Prospective validation will support implementation in clinical practice.

Abstract

What's new?

Diagnosing endometrial cancer generally relies on histopathological analysis of endometrial biopsy samples. However, these tests are inconclusive in up to 30% of patients. To find a better way, these authors tested whether genetic analysis of endometrial or cervical samples could boost the diagnostic accuracy of the test. They tested 59 EC patients and 31 controls for 8 different genetic mutations using tissue from either Pap brush samples, pipelle biopsies, or self-samples. Combining histopathology with mutation testing increased sensitivity from 79% to 93-97%.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.