Volume 144, Issue 9 pp. 2303-2312
Tumor Markers and Signatures

Measurement of tumor mutational burden (TMB) in routine molecular diagnostics: in silico and real-life analysis of three larger gene panels

Volker Endris

Volker Endris

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Ivo Buchhalter

Ivo Buchhalter

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Allgäuer

Michael Allgäuer

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Eugen Rempel

Eugen Rempel

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Amelie Lier

Amelie Lier

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Anna-Lena Volckmar

Anna-Lena Volckmar

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Martina Kirchner

Martina Kirchner

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Moritz von Winterfeld

Moritz von Winterfeld

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Jonas Leichsenring

Jonas Leichsenring

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Olaf Neumann

Olaf Neumann

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Roland Penzel

Roland Penzel

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Wilko Weichert

Wilko Weichert

Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich partner site, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Hanno Glimm

Hanno Glimm

German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Stefan Fröhling

Stefan Fröhling

German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Hauke Winter

Hauke Winter

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Felix Herth

Felix Herth

Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Thomas

Michael Thomas

Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Schirmacher

Peter Schirmacher

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg partner site, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Jan Budczies

Jan Budczies

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg partner site, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Albrecht Stenzinger

Corresponding Author

Albrecht Stenzinger

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg partner site, Germany

Correspondence to: Albrecht Stenzinger, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany, E-mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +49.6221-56.36095; Fax: +49.6221-56.5251Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 November 2018
Citations: 85
Conflict of interest: VE is a consultant/advisory board member for Thermo Fisher and received lecture fees from Astra Zeneca. AS is a consultant/advisory board member of AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Illumina, and received speaker's honoraria from BMS, MSD, Roche, Illumina, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Thermo Fisher as well as research funding from Chugai and BMS. WW is a consultant/advisory board member of Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, BMS, Boehringer, Novartis, Merck and obtained research funding from BMS, Roche, and MSD. PS received advisory board honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Novartis and AstraZeneca as well as speaker's honoraria and research funding from Roche, AstraZeneca and Novartis. MT received advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Lilly, BMS, MSD; Roche, Celgene, Takeda, AbbVie and Boehringer, speaker's honoraria from Lilly, MSD, Takeda, research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Roche and travel grants from BMS, MSD, Novartis and Boehringer. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract

Assessment of Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) for response stratification of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors is emerging as a new biomarker. Commonly defined as the total number of exonic somatic mutations, TMB approximates the amount of neoantigens that potentially are recognized by the immune system. While whole exome sequencing (WES) is an unbiased approach to quantify TMB, implementation in diagnostics is hampered by tissue availability as well as time and cost constrains. Conversely, panel-based targeted sequencing is nowadays widely used in routine molecular diagnostics, but only very limited data are available on its performance for TMB estimation. Here, we evaluated three commercially available larger gene panels with covered genomic regions of 0.39 Megabase pairs (Mbp), 0.53 Mbp and 1.7 Mbp using i) in silico analysis of TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data and ii) wet-lab sequencing of a total of 92 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancer samples grouped in three independent cohorts (non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC; colorectal cancer, CRC; and mixed cancer types) for which matching WES data were available. We observed a strong correlation of the panel data with WES mutation counts especially for the gene panel >1Mbp. Sensitivity and specificity related to TMB cutpoints for checkpoint inhibitor response in NSCLC determined by wet-lab experiments well reflected the in silico data. Additionally, we highlight potential pitfalls in bioinformatics pipelines and provide recommendations for variant filtering. In summary, our study is a valuable data source for researchers working in the field of immuno-oncology as well as for diagnostic laboratories planning TMB testing.

Abstract

What's new?

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. While TMB can be measured by whole exome sequencing (WES), costs, turn-around time, and tissue availability currently favor a panel sequencing approach using FFPE tissue for routine diagnostics. However, performance remains to be clarified. Our study is the first worldwide that analyses three major commercial gene panels by comparing TMB approximation across panels as well as against the technical reference standard WES. The data suggest that TMB approximation using gene panel sequencing of FFPE tumor tissue is feasible and can be implemented in routine diagnostics.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.