Is the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer affected by whether women attend a steady-state screening program?
Corresponding Author
Linda de Munck
Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: Linda de Munck, MSc, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, P.O. Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands, Tel: +31 88 234 63 23, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJacques Fracheboud
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorGeertruida H. de Bock
Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorGerard J. den Heeten
Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorSabine Siesling
Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Department of Health Technology & Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorMireille J.M. Broeders
Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Linda de Munck
Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: Linda de Munck, MSc, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, P.O. Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands, Tel: +31 88 234 63 23, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJacques Fracheboud
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorGeertruida H. de Bock
Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorGerard J. den Heeten
Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorSabine Siesling
Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Department of Health Technology & Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorMireille J.M. Broeders
Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In this cross-sectional population-based study, we assessed the incidence of advanced breast cancer based on screening attendance. Women from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were included if aged ≥49 years and diagnosed with breast cancer between 2006 and 2011, and data were linked with the screening program. Cancers were defined as screen-related (diagnosed <24 months after screening) or nonscreened (all other breast cancers). Two cut-offs were used to define advanced breast cancer: TNM-stage (III–IV vs 0–I–II) and T-stage alone (≥15 mm vs <15 mm or DCIS). The incidence rates were adjusted for age and logistic regression was used to compare groups. Of the 72,612 included women diagnosed with breast cancer, 44,246 (61%) had screen-related breast cancer. By TNM stage, advanced cancer was almost three times as likely to be at an advanced TNM stage in the nonscreened group compared with the screen-related group (38 and 94 per 100,000, respectively; OR: 2.86, 95%CI: 2.72–3.00). By T-stage, the incidence of advanced cancer was higher overall, and in nonscreened women was significantly higher than in screened women (210 and 169 per 100,000; OR: 1.85, 95%CI: 1.78–1.93). Data on actual screening attendance showed that the incidence of advanced breast cancer was significantly higher in nonscreened women than in screened women, supporting the expectation that screening would cause a stage shift to early detection. Despite critical evaluations of breast cancer screening programs, our data show that breast cancer screening is a valuable tool that can reduce the disease burden in women.
Abstract
What's new?
The value of breast cancer screening is still under debate. To date, most observational studies have reported the incidence of early and advanced breast cancer without differentiating by screening status. This study compared the age-specific incidence rates of early and advanced breast cancer among attenders and non-attenders of a fully implemented, steady-state screening program based on individual screening status and background incidence of breast cancer. There was a significantly lower incidence of advanced breast cancer in patients who attended screening compared with patients who did not. Breast cancer screening is associated with earlier stage at diagnosis, which should improve outcomes.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
ijc31388-sup-0001-suppinfo01.pdf174.9 KB | Supporting Information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1 Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ. 1988; 297: 943–8.
- 2 Chu KC, Smart CR, Tarone RE. Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the health insurance plan clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst . 1988; 80: 1125–32.
- 3 Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, et al. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39: 1755–60.
- 4 Frisell J, Lidbrink E, Hellström L, et al. Followup after 11 years – update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat . 1997; 45: 263–70.
- 5 Bjurstam NG, Björneld LM, Duffy SW. Updated results of the Gothenburg Trial of Mammographic Screening. Cancer. 2016; 122: 1832–5.
- 6 Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. The Lancet. 2012; 380: 1778–86.
- 7 Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CWN, et al. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2003; 361: 1411–7.
- 8 Blanks RG, Moss SM, McGahan CE, et al. Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality. BMJ. 2000; 321: 665–9.
- 9 Njor S, Nystrom L, Moss S, The Euroscreen Working Group, et al. Breast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studies. J Med Screen . 2012; 19: 33–41.
- 10 Broeders MJM, Moss S, Nyström L, for the EUROSCREEN Working Group, et al. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J Med Screen . 2012; 19: 14–25.
- 11 Autier P, Boniol M, Middleton R, et al. Advanced breast cancer incidence following population-based mammographic screening. Annals of Oncology. 2011; 22: 1726–35.
- 12 Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1998–2005.
- 13 Welch HG, Prorok PC, O'Malley AJ, et al. Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med . 2016; 375: 1438–47.
- 14 Autier P, Héry C, Haukka J, et al. Advanced breast cancer and breast cancer mortality in randomized controlled trials on mammography screening. Jco . 2009; 27: 5919–23.
- 15 Day NE, Williams DR, Khaw KT. Breast cancer screening programmes: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system. Br J Cancer . 1989; 59: 954–8.
- 16 Saadatmand S, Bretveld R, Siesling S, Tilanus-Linthorst MMA. Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients. Bmj. 2015; 351: h4901
- 17 Sopik V, Nofech-Mozes S, Sun P, et al. The relationship between local recurrence and death in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat . 2016; 155: 175–85.
- 18 de Glas NA, de Craen AJM, Bastiaannet E, et al. Effect of implementation of the mass breast cancer screening programme in older women in the Netherlands: population based study. Br Med J. 2014; 5: S20
- 19 Lousdal ML, Kristiansen IS, Møller B, et al. Trends in breast cancer stage distribution before, during and after introduction of a screening programme in Norway. Eur J Public Health. 2014; 24: 1017–22.
- 20 Foca F, Mancini S, Bucchi L, et al. Decreasing incidence of late-stage breast cancer after the introduction of organized mammography screening in Italy. Cancer. 2013; 119: 2022–8.
- 21 Helvie MA, Chang JT, Hendrick RE, et al. Reduction in late-stage breast cancer incidence in the mammography era: Implications for overdiagnosis of invasive cancer. Cancer. 2014; 120: 2649–56.
- 22 Fracheboud J, Otto SJ, van Dijck JAAM, et al. Decreased rates of advanced breast cancer due to mammography screening in The Netherlands. Br J Cancer . 2004; 91: 861–7.
- 23 Autier P, Boniol M, Koechlin A, Pizot C, Boniol M. Effectiveness of and overdiagnosis from mammography screening in the Netherlands: population based study. Bmj. 2017; 359
- 24 Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC, Kalager M, et al. Breast cancer screening in Denmark: A cohort study of tumor size and overdiagnosis. Ann Intern Med . 2017; 166: 313–23.
- 25 Puliti D, Bucchi L, Mancini S, et al. Advanced breast cancer rates in the epoch of service screening: The 400,000 women cohort study from Italy. Eur J Cancer. 2017; 75: 109–16.
- 26 Hofvind S, Lee CI, Elmore JG. Stage-specific breast cancer incidence rates among participants and non-participants of a population-based mammographic screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat . 2012; 135: 291–9.
- 27 International Agency for Research on Cancer. Breast Cancer Screening, 2nd edn., vol. 15. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2016. 469-p.
- 28The Netherlands Cancer Registry. Cijfers over kanker (viewed 9 Juni 2016). http://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl/?language=en.
- 29 Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 6th edn. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2002, 239-p.
- 30 Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Seventh Edition. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 310-p
- 31 Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Boer R, National Evaluation Team for Breast cancer screening in The Netherlands, et al. Nationwide breast cancer screening programme fully implemented in The Netherlands. Breast. 2001; 10: 6–11.
- 32 CJ D'Orsi, LW Bassett, W Berg, SA Feig, VP Jackson, DB Kopans, eds. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS Mammography, 4th edn. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
- 33 Fracheboud J, van Luijt PA, Sankatsing VDV, et al. National Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening in The Netherlands 1990–2011/2012. Rotterdam: Optima Grafische Communicatie, 2014.
- 34 Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Day NE, et al. Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insights from results of screening. Lancet. 1992; 339: 412–4.
- 35Statistics Netherlands, StatLine (viewed 21 June 2016). http://statline.cbs.nl/statweb/?LA=en.
- 36Publications Office of the European Union. Revision of the European Standard Population - Report of Eurostat's task forceed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013.121p
- 37 Norman S, Localio AR, Zhou L, et al. Benefit of screening mammography in reducing the rate of late-stage breast cancer diagnoses (United States). Cancer Causes Control . 2006; 17: 921–9.
- 38 Lousdal ML, Kristiansen IS, Moller B, et al. Effect of organised mammography screening on stage-specific incidence in Norway: population study. Br J Cancer. 2016; 114: 590–6.
- 39 Louwman WJ, Voogd AC, van Dijck JAAM, et al. On the rising trends of incidence and prognosis for breast cancer patients diagnosed 1975–2004: a long-term population-based study in southeastern Netherlands. Cancer Causes Control . 2008; 19: 97–106.
- 40 Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. Bmj. 2009; 339: b2587–9.
- 41 Martinez-Alonso M, Vilaprinyo E, Marcos-Gragera R, et al. Breast cancer incidence and overdiagnosis in Catalonia (Spain). Breast Cancer Res . 2010; 12: R58
- 42 Ripping TM, Verbeek ALM, Fracheboud J, et al. Overdiagnosis by mammographic screening for breast cancer studied in birth cohorts in The Netherlands. Int J Cancer . 2015; 137: 921–9.
- 43 de Gelder R, Heijnsdijk EAM, van Ravesteyn NT, et al. Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening. Epidemiol Rev. 2011; 33: 111–21.
- 44 Otten JDM, Broeders MJM, Den Heeten GJ, et al. Life expectancy of screen-detected invasive breast cancer patients compared with women invited to the Nijmegen screening program. Cancer. 2010; 116: 586–91.
- 45 van den Broek AJ, Schmidt MK, van ‘T Veer LJ, Tollenaar RAEM, et al. Worse breast cancer prognosis of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: what's the evidence? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Plos One. 2015; 10: e0120189.
- 46 Aarts MJ, Voogd AC, Duijm LEM, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in attending the mass screening for breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands—associations with stage at diagnosis and survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat . 2011; 128: 517–25.
- 47 Paap E, Verbeek AL, Puliti D, et al. Minor influence of self-selection bias on the effectiveness of breast cancer screening in case-control studies in the Netherlands. J Med Screen. 2011; 18: 142–6.
- 48 Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med . 2007; 356: 227–36.
- 49 van der Waal D, Emaus MJ, Bakker MF, et al. Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands. Eur Radiol . 2015; 25: 3328–37.
- 50 Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, et al. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy. JAMA Intern Med . 2013; 173: 807–16.