Volume 135, Issue 1 pp. 204-213
Epidemiology

Divergent coverage, frequency and costs of organised and opportunistic Pap testing in Finland

Heini Salo

Corresponding Author

Heini Salo

Department of Vaccination and Immune Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland

Conflict of interest: Heini Salo, Pekka Nieminen, Terhi Kilpi, Tuija Leino, Ahti Anttila were members of the National Expert Group on HPV Related Disease Prevention. Pekka Nieminen has been a medical consultant for GlaxoSmithKline Ltd. and Sanofi-Pasteur MSD Ltd. Terhi Kilpi is principal investigator of a nationwide effectiveness study of the ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine mainly funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Matti Lehtinen has received grants for HPV vaccination studies through his employer University of Tampere, Finland from Merck&Co. Inc and GSK Biologicals.

Correspondence to: Heini Salo, Department of Vaccination and Immune Protection/Vaccination Programme Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Pekka Nieminen

Pekka Nieminen

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Espoo, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Terhi Kilpi

Terhi Kilpi

Department of Vaccination and Immune Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Kari Auranen

Kari Auranen

Department of Vaccination and Immune Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Tuija Leino

Tuija Leino

Department of Vaccination and Immune Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Simopekka Vänskä

Simopekka Vänskä

Department of Vaccination and Immune Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland

School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Petri Tiihonen

Petri Tiihonen

Department of Vaccination and Immune Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Matti Lehtinen

Matti Lehtinen

School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Ahti Anttila

Ahti Anttila

Mass Screening Registry, Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 December 2013
Citations: 28

Abstract

We evaluated the overall coverage, frequency and costs of Pap testing by screening modality and health care provider in Finland. Information about Pap testing in the Finnish female population of 2.7 million was obtained from nationwide population-based registry data. Among women aged 25–69 years, 87% had had a Pap test taken within or outside the organised programme at least once during the last 5 years and half of those screened in the organised programme had also had at least one Pap test taken outside the programme. Of the annual average of 530,000 Pap tests taken, 84% were taken for screening purposes and 16% as follow-up. Forty percent of the 446,000 annual screening tests were taken in the organised programme, 55% as opportunistic tests in public primary or student health care or by private providers and 5% in public secondary health care. One-fifth of all opportunistic screening Pap tests were taken from women aged <25. The voluminous opportunistic Pap testing in public primary health care was concentrated in young women aged 25–29 whereas the bulk of opportunistic testing in private health occurred in age groups eligible for organised screening. The total cost of all screening Pap tests was €22.4 million, of which 71% incurred in opportunistic screening. Of the 84,000 annual follow-up Pap tests and their €8.3 million total costs, ∼60% incurred in organised screening or in secondary health care.

Abstract

What's new?

Finland is renowned for its performance and effectiveness in organised cervical cancer screening but the magnitude and significance of opportunistic Pap testing remains unknown. Here, overall coverage and costs of organised screening and opportunistic Pap testing in Finland were estimated using nationwide registry data. Of annual screening tests, 55% were found to be taken as opportunistic tests in public primary or student health care, accounting for as much as 71% of total screening costs. The findings shed light on the development of cost-effective HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening strategies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.