Combined CADM1 and MAL promoter methylation analysis to detect (pre-)malignant cervical lesions in high-risk HPV-positive women†
Renée M. Overmeer
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorJacqueline A. Louwers
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorChris J.L.M. Meijer
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorFolkert J. van Kemenade
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAlbertus T. Hesselink
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorNathalie Fransen Daalmeijer
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorSaskia M. Wilting
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorDaniëlle A.M. Heideman
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorRené H.M. Verheijen
Division of Women and Baby, Gynecological Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAfra Zaal
Division of Women and Baby, Gynecological Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorW. Marchien van Baal
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorJohannes Berkhof
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorPeter J.F. Snijders
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Renske D.M. Steenbergen
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel.: +31-20-4442331, Fax: +31-20-4442964
Department of Pathology, Unit of Molecular Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this authorRenée M. Overmeer
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorJacqueline A. Louwers
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorChris J.L.M. Meijer
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorFolkert J. van Kemenade
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAlbertus T. Hesselink
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorNathalie Fransen Daalmeijer
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorSaskia M. Wilting
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorDaniëlle A.M. Heideman
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorRené H.M. Verheijen
Division of Women and Baby, Gynecological Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAfra Zaal
Division of Women and Baby, Gynecological Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorW. Marchien van Baal
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorJohannes Berkhof
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorPeter J.F. Snijders
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Renske D.M. Steenbergen
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel.: +31-20-4442331, Fax: +31-20-4442964
Department of Pathology, Unit of Molecular Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this authorConflict of interest: C.J.L.M.M., D.A.M.H., P.J.F.S. and R.D.M.S. have relationships with Self-Screen, a company involved in cervical cancer screening by self sampling. R.H.M.V. is member of the advisory board of Pantarhei Bioscience
Abstract
Given the lower specificity for high-grade cervical lesions of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing compared to cytology, additional triage testing for hrHPV test-positive women is needed to detect high-grade cervical lesions. Here, we tested whether combined methylation analysis for cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1) and T-lymphocyte maturation associated protein (MAL), both functionally involved in cervical carcinogenesis, could serve as such a triage marker. Four quantitative methylation-specific PCRs (qMSP), two for CADM1 (regions M12 and M18) and MAL (regions M1 and M2) each, were applied to 261 cervical tissue specimens ranging from no neoplasia to carcinoma. When qMSPs were combined and positivity for at least one of the qMSPs in the combination was taken into account, the highest positivity rates for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) lesions (97%) and squamous cell- and adeno-carcinomas (99%) were obtained by combining a single CADM1 marker with a single MAL marker. Subsequent qMSP analysis of 70 GP5+/6+-PCR hrHPV-positive scrapings revealed that a two-marker panel consisting of CADM1-M18 and MAL-M1 was most discriminative, detecting 90% of women with CIN3 (n = 30), whereas it showed a positive result in only 13.5% of women without cervical disease (n = 40). Finally, we applied hrHPV GP5+/6+-PCR testing followed by CADM1-M18/MAL-M1 methylation analysis to a cohort of 79 women visiting the outpatient colposcopy clinic. hrHPV testing revealed a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 33% for CIN3+. Additional CADM1-M18/MAL-M1 methylation analysis on the hrHPV-positive women increased the specificity to 78% with a sensitivity of 70%. In conclusion, the methylation marker panel CADM1-M18 and MAL-M1 may serve as an alternative molecular triage tool for hrHPV-positive women.
References
- 1 Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade FJ, Boeke AJ, Bulk S, Voorhorst FJ, Verheijen RH, van GK, Boon ME, Ruitinga W, van BM, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial. Lancet 2007; 370: 1764–72.
- 2 Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla PP, Del Mistro A, Ghiringhello B, Girlando S, Gillio-Tos A, De Marco L, Naldoni C, Pierotti P, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 249–57.
- 3 Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, Strand A, Wadell G, Elfgren K, Radberg T, Strander B, Johansson B, Forslund O, Hansson BG, Rylander E, et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1589–97.
- 4 Cuzick J. Long-term follow-up in cancer prevention trials (It ain't over ‘til it’s over). Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2010; 3: 689–91.
- 5 Wentzensen N, Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Wang SS. Utility of methylation markers in cervical cancer early detection: appraisal of the state-of-the-science. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 293–9.
- 6 Overmeer RM, Henken FE, Bierkens M, Wilting SM, Timmerman I, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ, Steenbergen RD. Repression of MAL tumour suppressor activity by promoter methylation during cervical carcinogenesis. J Pathol 2009; 219: 327–36.
- 7 Wisman GB, Nijhuis ER, Hoque MO, Reesink-Peters N, Koning AJ, Volders HH, Buikema HJ, Boezen HM, Hollema H, Schuuring E, Sidransky D, van der Zee AG. Assessment of gene promoter hypermethylation for detection of cervical neoplasia. Int J Cancer 2006; 119: 1908–14.
- 8 Kahn SL, Ronnett BM, Gravitt PE, Gustafson KS. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR for the detection of aberrant DNA methylation in liquid-based Pap tests. Cancer 2008; 114: 57–64.
- 9 Steenbergen RD, Kramer D, Braakhuis BJ, Stern PL, Verheijen RH, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ. TSLC1 gene silencing in cervical cancer cell lines and cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 294–305.
- 10 Lai HC, Lin YW, Huang TH, Yan P, Huang RL, Wang HC, Liu J, Chan MW, Chu TY, Sun CA, Chang CC, Yu MH. Identification of novel DNA methylation markers in cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 2008; 123: 161–7.
- 11 Gustafson KS, Furth EE, Heitjan DF, Fansler ZB, Clark DP. DNA methylation profiling of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using liquid-based cytology specimens: an approach that utilizes receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Cancer 2004; 102: 259–68.
- 12 Wang SS, Smiraglia DJ, Wu YZ, Ghosh S, Rader JS, Cho KR, Bonfiglio TA, Nayar R, Plass C, Sherman ME. Identification of novel methylation markers in cervical cancer using restriction landmark genomic scanning. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 2489–97.
- 13 Kitkumthorn N, Yanatatsanajit P, Kiatpongsan S, Phokaew C, Triratanachat S, Trivijitsilp P, Termrungruanglert W, Tresukosol D, Niruthisard S, Mutirangura A. Cyclin A1 promoter hypermethylation in human papillomavirus-associated cervical cancer. BMC Cancer 2006; 6: 1–9.
- 14 Sova P, Feng Q, Geiss G, Wood T, Strauss R, Rudolf V, Lieber A, Kiviat N. Discovery of novel methylation biomarkers in cervical carcinoma by global demethylation and microarray analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 114–23.
- 15 Overmeer RM, Henken FE, Snijders PJ, Claassen-Kramer D, Berkhof J, Helmerhorst TJ, Heideman DA, Wilting SM, Murakami Y, Ito A, Meijer CJ, Steenbergen RD. Association between dense CADM1 promoter methylation and reduced protein expression in high-grade CIN and cervical SCC. J Pathol 2008; 215: 388–97.
- 16 Bulkmans NW, Rozendaal L, Snijders PJ, Voorhorst FJ, Boeke AJ, Zandwijken GR, van Kemenade FJ, Verheijen RH, Groningen K, Boon ME, Keuning HJ, van BM, et al. POBASCAM, a population-based randomized controlled trial for implementation of high-risk HPV testing in cervical screening: design, methods and baseline data of 44,102 women. Int J Cancer 2004; 110: 94–101.
- 17 da Gloria Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz M, Nicolau SM, Stavale JN, Focchi J, Castelo A, Dores GB, Mielzynska-Lohnas I, Lorincz A, Rodrigues dL. Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30: 220–6.
- 18 Bulk S, van Kemenade FJ, Rozendaal L, Meijer CJ. The Dutch CISOE-A framework for cytology reporting increases efficacy of screening upon standardisation since 1996. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57: 388–93.
- 19 Vereniging van Integrale Kankercentra. Dutch guideline: treatment of Cervical Intra-epithelial Neoplasia (CIN) according to Werkgroep Oncologische Gyneacologie. 2004. Available at: www.oncoline.nl.
- 20 de Wilde J, Kooter JM, Overmeer RM, Claassen-Kramer D, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ, Steenbergen RD. hTERT promoter activity and CpG methylation in HPV-induced carcinogenesis. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 1–14.
- 21 Jacobs MV, Snijders PJ, van den Brule AJ, Helmerhorst TJ, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM. A general primer GP5+/GP6(+)-mediated PCR-enzyme immunoassay method for rapid detection of 14 high-risk and 6 low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapings. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 791–5.
- 22 van den Brule AJ, Pol R, Fransen-Daalmeijer N, Schouls LM, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ. GP5+/6+ PCR followed by reverse line blot analysis enables rapid and high-throughput identification of human papillomavirus genotypes. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 779–87.
- 23 Kagan J, Srivastava S, Barker PE, Belinsky SA, Cairns P. Towards clinical application of methylated DNA sequences as cancer biomarkers: a joint NCI's EDRN and NIST workshop on standards, methods, assays, reagents and tools. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 4545–9.
- 24 Harden SV, Guo Z, Epstein JI, Sidransky D. Quantitative GSTP1 methylation clearly distinguishes benign prostatic tissue and limited prostate adenocarcinoma. J Urol 2003; 169: 1138–42.
- 25 Buffart TE, Overmeer RM, Steenbergen RD, Tijssen M, van Grieken NC, Snijders PJ, Grabsch HI, van de V, Carvalho B, Meijer GA. MAL promoter hypermethylation as a novel prognostic marker in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2008; 99: 1802–7.
- 26 Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, Saltz LB, Blake C, Shibata D, Danenberg PV, Laird PW. MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: E32 I–VIII.
- 27 Feng Q, Balasubramanian A, Hawes SE, Toure P, Sow PS, Dem A, Dembele B, Critchlow CW, Xi L, Lu H, McIntosh MW, Young AM, et al. Detection of hypermethylated genes in women with and without cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 273–82.
- 28 Kim JH, Choi YD, Lee JS, Lee JH, Nam JH, Choi C. Assessment of DNA methylation for the detection of cervical neoplasia in liquid-based cytology specimens. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 116: 99–104.
- 29 Shivapurkar N, Sherman ME, Stastny V, Echebiri C, Rader JS, Nayar R, Bonfiglio TA, Gazdar AF, Wang SS. Evaluation of candidate methylation markers to detect cervical neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107: 549–53.