Volume 120, Issue 4 pp. 821-824
Epidemiology

Surveillance for endometrial cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome

Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo

Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo

Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Ralf Bützow

Ralf Bützow

Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Arto Leminen

Arto Leminen

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Pentti Lehtovirta

Pentti Lehtovirta

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Jukka-Pekka Mecklin

Jukka-Pekka Mecklin

Department of Surgery, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Heikki J. Järvinen

Corresponding Author

Heikki J. Järvinen

Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Fax: +358-9-47174609.

Department of surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, PL 340, 00029 HUS, FinlandSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 27 December 2006
Citations: 158

Abstract

The estimated lifetime risk for endometrial carcinoma (EC) in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) is 32–60%, thus supporting surveillance. The survival rate of EC patients is, however, favourable questioning the need for surveillance. Yet, the effectiveness of gynecological surveillance remains to be shown. The 2 previously published studies were based on transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) alone. Intrauterine biopsy has not been tested in surveillance for EC in HNPCC families. The effect of gynecological surveillance was evaluated among 175 Finnish mutation carriers. During 759 person years at risk, there were 503 surveillance visits including TVUS and intrauterine biopsy of endometrium at 94% and 74% of the visits, respectively. EC occurred in 14 cases, 11 of which were diagnosed by surveillance, 8 by intrauterine biopsies. TVUS indicated only 4 EC patients but missed 6 other cases. Intrauterine sampling detected 14 additional cases of potentially premalignant hyperplasia. The stage distribution and survival tended to be more favorable in the 14 EC cases of the surveilled group (no deaths) than in the group of 83 symptomatic mutation carriers of whom 6 died of EC, but with no statistical significance. Four cases of ovarian cancer occurred but none was detected by surveillance in TVUS examinations. In conclusion, EC surveillance in HNPCC seems more effective with endometrial biopsies than with TVUS alone. A definite improvement in survival remains to be shown. The detection of early cancer stages and premalignant lesions offers the opportunity to avoid extensive adjuvant treatment. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.